Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/23/09 in all areas

  1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSRju-muVuM&feature=channel_page :smilewink:
    1 point
  2. created the effect of combat wear, dust grime grit maintenance finger marks on ka50 windows. add to temp textures folder =have fun screen
    1 point
  3. Hope you will do your end of the bargain: 1. "generation" rating is misleading and the 4.5, 4+, 4++, 4+++, 4.92837 is simply marketings talking. It's a multirole combat aircraft, that can perform many roles without switching equipment ? It's a 4th generation aircraft. It have also a passive low visibility ? Than it's 5th gen aircraft. No middle ground there. 2. F-16C/D Block 52+ in Polish variant (it is unique mind you) have very good avionics suite, the WRE is especialy capable, probably only the Israeli Sufa and purpose build WRE aircrafts can top that right now. Radar have better range and power (burn through jamming is esential in defender role). 3. F-16 have better combat radius that availble Gripen variants, with CFTs and drop tanks - there is no competition... plus we always can give it Israeli mod with 5 droptanks total, including 600 gal ones on inner underwing stations. And range IS crutial in defender role - time on station is very important if you don't have tankers, or enough airplanes to replace those in the air guarding airspace. 4. '39 IS small, that is correct... small also means low growth potential. The RCS is not really a problem after "Have Glass" program on Viper, and the difference betwen RCS of a Flanker, and a Viper. 5. Viper can operate from 800m runways too... actually hauling the same amount of junk and juice as the '39 on its MTOW. That big engine makes a lot diference. 6. IIRC Saab asked 78 mln USD per aircraft with training, spares, some armament inlcuding their license build AIM-120A, AIM-9M, and Maverics (IRIS-T were to bought later). Lockheed sold F-16 for 82mln USD also with training, spares and armament inlcuding AIM-120C-5, AIM-9X, JDAM, JSOW, Maverics, Panthera targeting and DB-110 recce pods. Hell of a deal if you ask me.
    1 point
  4. can't read russian, but the model is very nice:thumbup: greets
    1 point
  5. The HUD is for killing people and breaking things...not for flying. For aerobatics, you look out whichever window is providing the best view of the horizon and make quick glances at the ASI, accelerometer and altimeter as needed. 25 years of combat sims and the fixed HUD view have raised a generation of virtual pilots who think that's where they are supposed to look. Smokin' Hole
    1 point
  6. I have been on a short holiday trip to London with my GF, and we (well I actually... ) spontaneously decided to visit the Imperial War Museum at Duxford Airfield (that also hosts The Fighter Collection TFC). We departed on thursday evening from Stansted, which is not that far from Duxford, so this lent itself quite nicely for a last day's excursion. I have taken some pictures and thought I would post them here. Unfortunately some are not of the best quality, and we didn't have much time on the site, so we couldn't even visit all Hangars, plus the cam's battery died pretty quickly, so the pics cover only a small part of the aircraft on display in Duxford. However, they give you an impression of how great that museum is, so if you visit London or Cambridge one day make sure that it is on your schedule. How we got to the airfield is also quite a funny story. We asked at a visitors center if there was an easy way to get to Duxford from London, and were told that we could take the train to Cambridge and then a bus to the museum. Fine. Thursday morning we got up at 7, had a nice breakfast, checked out of the hotel at nine and took the underground to Liverpool station. Now because of the morning traffic this actually took 45 mins, the train was crowded and we didn't have seats, so by the time we arrived at the station my shirt was already drenched... Anyway, up to the ticket counter, where we talked to a very nice and humourous Brit. He told us that we could drive all the way to Cambridge, however we could also depart at Whittlesford, which according to him is "not the biggest place in the world", but which is "only about a mile from the museum, and a short walk will do you no harm". You guess it, pure British understatement, but we didn't think much about it, since we hoped that we could actually save some time (the bus from Cambridge to Duxford takes about 45 mins + the two train stations from Whittlesford to Cambridge + waiting for the Bus)... Great, so we went on the train, had a nice ride though the English countryside, until we got off in Whittlesford. I had expected some kind of sign leading the way to the museum, well, there wasn't any, so I asked the man at the station's ticket office for the way. He explained it more or less detailed and finished with the remark that "we would be better off to take a cab, since it was only a mile but we would have to walk along a very busy motorway". I thought "cab my arse", the whole trip already costs us a fortune, "and a short walk will do us no harm", so I thanked him and said that we will take a look... Off we go, just to go astray pretty soon, so we had to ask another guy, who was sleeping in his little office at the entrance of some kind of automobile company. He told us to go back, then left, pass the first roundabout, then the second, and then on the left side we would see the airfield. Sounds easy, so we continued our walk. Keep in mind that we had all of our baggae with us (cases + bagpacks), the sun was shining and it was quite a warm spring day (I estimate ~20°C). We first wanted to drive to Stansted and leave our baggage there before going to Duxford, but this would have cost us even more time, so we took it with us in the hope that the museum would have a cloakroom (which it hadn't, but we could leave our baggage in the first aid room). I don't know if it was really "only a mile" or not, but you can believe me that it was a very, very loooong mile... And indeed we had to walk on the grass strip along the motorway for some time, the people passing us in their cars looked at us as if we were some kind of crazy aliens. I felt like being lead actor in a cheap Hollywood B-movie, you know, "Stranded on Route 66" or something, while my GF kept on cursing me. In any case, after about 3/4 hrs we finally arrived at our destination, exhausted and covered with dust (the sidewalk wasn't actually "trolley-friendly"). "A little walking will do you no harm", heh, I thought I had just passed my first day in bootcamp. However, Duxford itself compensated for everything, even though we had little time, it is truly an amazing site for anybody who is interested in aviation. (Btw, on our way back to Cambridge the bus went right through Whittlesford... D'oh) So here are the pics: The flightline The conservation hangar F-15 Mi-24. Note the German army marks, the Hind had been employed by the NVA, and after the reunification it was adopted by the Germany army. Fieseler Storch Ju-52 The American Air museum B-52 pit SR-71 B-29 B-17 (and my GF trying to look interested ;) )
    1 point
  7. экспорт чата для удалённого управления сервером командами имён тригерных зон сработавших в миссии для перезагрузки после выполнения всех заданий
    1 point
  8. Комикадзе - Камикадзе ухахатываюсь - ухохатываюсь доблесно - доблестно яропорту - аэропорту моневры - маневры личу - лечу В последствии - Впоследствии поподания - попадания акроботически - акробатически выполнеными - выполненными (тут вообще нужно "выполненным") ("мелочь" вроде знаков препинания учитывать не будем). Не многовато ли для одного постинга?
    1 point
  9. Cold Response 09 http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?t=153269
    1 point
  10. WTF is easy flight mode? Is that the mode people use when they fail at life?
    1 point
  11. 025 (налить) и Су-27, куда воткнёте там и встану :D :P (интересно, а реальная авиация тк же часто летает? :D :D)
    1 point
  12. Hiermit soll es auch automatisch funktionieren. http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=39261 Immer vorausgesetzt Du verwendest Vista. Mit XP wird das nüscht. Aber Airway hat auch recht. SF benutzen, deine Frage wurde schon etliche Male im englischen Forum erörtert. Und die Jungs von ED wissen ziemlich gut was Ihr Programm kann, und was nicht. Hilfreich wäre es, wenn Du bei technischen Fragen, Deine Specs mit posten würdest. Grüsse
    1 point
  13. Hehe. :thumbup: I almost finished all of the main part construction. Remain the side flaps, flaps, ailerons, elevators, mainger parts, static dischargers, and so on...
    1 point
  14. Installed, looks nice I can't say it doesn't. But the past of IE is not good... Still don't know Am I browsing Internet or Internet is browsing me? :D
    1 point
  15. Дааа..)) В той папке действительно содержится опасный вирус, по вечерам он отнимает мужей у жен, отцов у детей, не дает спать ночами неженатым и учится им днем, после этого инфицированные особи начинают называть себя вирпилами, в их речи появляются непонятные "тимспик, гиперлобби, лосерф, илс, мануал, профиль для сайтека" и пр :D А если серьезно то ради эксперимента сейчас натравил на паку с игрой Нортон и Каспер, все с последними обновлениями, ничего подозрительного нет :)
    1 point
  16. No, it's the Su-30KI Demonstrator skin came with new model However, there's an old Su-27 skin on Lockonfiles look like the above skin at "Skin" box => Su-27 Skins => Page 7 called Su-27SK Flanker Another screenshots with Tomcatz Crowd Mod :D Looking at 3 last pictures i thought about the Su-27 accident in airshow at Lviv - Ukraine :doh:
    1 point
  17. Эх Андрей если я бы раньше с тобой связался и не было этой всей мыльной оперы! Да я подтверждаю что джой Х-52 и TrackIR 4 у Sadko2000! Еще раз спасибо! Друид. я тоже сомневаюсь... Но все же хочется верить что он больше такого не повторит. А на счет "мыльной оперы" -нет это не опера. Это Дружба и взаимовыручка таких людей как "верпилы". Еще РАЗ СПАСИБО ВСЕМ КТО НЕ БРОСИЛ В БЕДЕ!
    1 point
  18. http://www.banda-dv.narod.ru/files_etc.htm русификатор.
    1 point
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...