Leaderboard

Представляю вашему вниманию документ, который возможно будет интересен пилотам интересующимся ближним маневренным боем на истребителях в среде ЛО2. http://narod.ru/disk/25173553000/%D0%A2%D0%B5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%91%D0%92%D0%91_%D0%93%D0%A12_v1_0.rar.html

Знаешь почему Господь Бог создал Землю всего за 6 дней, а на 7-й еще и отдохнуть успел? Потому что ему не надо было обеспечивать совместимость с предыдущими версиями :)

GA reviews other videos. why cant someone review his. not like he's being a troll, its good info to have. GA can use it however, to more hone his skill..... or ignore it :P

Тема почищена. Извините, сделал как смог. По вопросам не связанным с А-10С, пожалуйста, создавайте отдельные темы в данном разделе.

No answer is not a no, it simply is not an answer :) Plz understand that testers, which is the majority of insiders in this thread, are not free to talk about unanounced features, so basically all they can do is beat a dead horse. You have to wait for someone higher up to have the time and answer these questions. btw. here you can see that LSS and LST are implemented. Now i wonder what these are good for ;)[/url]

You're not the only one being frustrated by seeing everything go online. I don't have the time to sit in a room and wait for people to join the game. I have zero tolerance for lag. I have zero tolerance for screwing around. And the parts I hate most about online gaming are talking to strangers, and most of those strangers being either a) smack-talking jerks or b) stupid little kids.

FC2, in all likelihood, has reached its last iteration, which is probably a good thing, considering the intellectual property and technical issues involved with its development. However, the enthusiasm for flying a wide diversity of aircraft in multiplayer has not diminished. If anything, it's stronger than ever. However, the development strategy of the DCS series is not geared toward meeting that demand. It revolves around military contracts. Whatever the military customer asks for, is what the civilian player gets. Moreover, the time between DCS modules is measured in years. Given that the stable of DCS aircraft is currently equal to exactly two, it's clear that the DCS series, by itself, cannot satisfy the demand for more flyables from both the red and blue sides, not within a reasonable time frame anyway. Perhaps the strategic thing to do would be to build on the LOMAC experience and create multiplayer flyables specifically for the DCS environment. These flyables could use the SFM (AFM in the case of the T-toad) and 3DOF cockpit that FC players are familiar with, without involving the IP and technical issues associated with the legacy code from LOMAC. They could be packaged as part of a multiplayer add-on for the DCS series. You could call it something like "DCS: Combined Air Operations". In this way, ED could continue to earn a return on its investment in FC, while enhancing the multiplayer experience and improving its revenue between DCS releases. And perhaps ED could finally cut ties with a certain company which shall not be named. Just thinking out loud. Thoughts? :pilotfly:

The DCS engine will probably require a new ray-based radar system, and probably a multithreading update, if not already in A-10C. I imagine these will take some time, so if combined with a complex fighter, then release day is far away. I'd like to see a simpler fighter, maybe an F-5/20, MiG-21/23/27, or an early MiG-29. Plenty of information, several air forces around the world still operate these aircraft (potential contracts), etc.

Awesome-I was actually going to suggest that efforts be concentrated on getting a dx9 product out sooner, with a dx11 patch later ala FSX, but I figured no one would give me the time-o-day. Selfish, as I don't have a DX11 card, but at least this way we stand a chance of getting A10 in our hands earlier.

Put 10 Ka-50's on the map flying in a circle with different skins and sit in the middle while watching :P

What he said x 2. No problem!

Thanks for the heads-up Wags. :)

Rather unfortunate, but thanks for the heads up Matt. I'd like to ask if that's all you can/will say on the matter, or would you be willing to say if it is something that will be continued to be worked on post-release for inclusion as a patch on the game N months after release (for example)? Just wondering if it's shelved for the next DCS module or still planned for the A10 post-release. Thanks. Edit: I see it got answered, thanks again :)

Normally a strange ticking sound from a harddrive means theres a HD crash not far away. Hope it´s not since its only when DCS is running. Maybe its coming from somewhere else. I would do a backup immediately. :)

Energy Fighting = 'Another F-15 pilot crashed right as I was about to kill him from G-Lock' :music_whistling:

Good luck, I tried it once, took me FOREVER just to line 1 up and I lost the will to live in the process, so I gave up. Tomcatz as working on that problem a while ago, I never saw any results from that. Try asking him.

Um, not 1 single shot in my movie was done online. It's just me and the AI ;)

Tossers

a nice F-16 video from Poland .. imagine to be done in DCS F-16

http://dcs-fan.ru/lockon/manuallockon/139-teorija-bvb - вот качать ничё не надо, так можно читать :) http://dcs-fan.ru/download/finish/11/81 - ещё одна альтернативная ссылка

Way before USB here. I had my old CH Fighterstick some 14 years in use, or so. Great stick and I loved the fact that it had the programming stored in the device. That made it really easy to program and use - no silly startup of software to run in the background, like it's the case with most sticks today.

Вот держи [ATTACH]42606[/ATTACH]

Asked earlier in this thread but not answered difinitively by anyone from ED. THis is mentioned on their website. Depending on the JTAC location to enemy forces and the time of day, JTAC target designation can be by sending UTM coordinates, laser designation, mortar smoke marker, or IR pointer. Unfortunately its not specific enough regarding who's doing the laser desig. I would imagine asking an AI wingman to attack my target will work as for a client MP wingman using laser coding ... no idea. Anyone of you ED testers know?

No there is not. And here's why. Having flown on the FC2 servers for a few months as Bramage, I see the Ka50 hardcore guys serious as a heart attack and the "gamers" cruising in with their survey jets and blasting everything in sight. Takes, what, 10-15 minutes to get your Shark in the air and a while to fly the hardcore beast to the combat area, now comes some clown in a survey F15 or Su27 who took 1 minute to start his jet and go air quaking, gettiing shot himself inside 15 minutes, rinse and repeat. Makes me sick. The dude in the hardcore mount has a vested interest in flying real world survival tactics when it takes so long to get into the action. The survey joker couldnt care less if he gets spanked cause heknows his turnaround is measured in minutes.

You can't please everyone... for me the movie is definitely not boring

I had the same problem... in 2.0. Have you patched it to 1.2.1? I think the bug was fixed in the patch.

I'm not to keen on F1. Touring, Rally yes but im the same as bumfire, F1 is a ripeout.

Yep 12,000 views on youtube in 2 days says something :thumbup:

I would like to say yes, but however much I love F1, every single F1 game I have, I am total shit at it. Seriously, the first semi bad corner I come to I seem to get wasted. I am lucky if I can do 1 good lap with a good time and without crashing or damaging the car, if I can do one, rest assured there wont be a 2nd lap like that. I just cannot seem to get into the groove when it comes to F1 car games. That being said, I am great at other car games, like Gran Turismo's, Dirt, TOCA etc, I seriously am pretty good at them if I say so myself, which makes it even stranger to figure out why, for the life of me I ALWAYS get raped when it comes to F1 games...

let's analize the problem . what choices ED has to face : - touch the largest public possible > a popular or renown aircraft - keep alive the excellency image the company has to simmers eyes , not turn into commercial compromises i mean arcade stuff . so the plane has to be realistic and to do so has to be provided with consequent documentation - jump over the opportunity of grabbing the maximum players from FS , to do so you need to release a plane known by lot of persons , everybody knows the F-16 i'm not sure everybody knows the SU-25 , nobody is perfect meanwhile :D - to keep in mind the storyline the plane has to have a long life duration before being obsolete i think the F-15 (with A2G capability shown in A-stan) has serious chances and would be a good air to air alternative to the two precedent muvers . but the question is is there enough documentation about that plane which is a major plane in US defence strategy . there's another thing to be taken into consideration it's the russian market which represents a large part of the consumers so

Lol, it is a challenge to land on. Most people like a challenge. It also adds variation, as you can land on a boat or land. Give me a fighter or give me death :) Your scenario brings us a fighter in maybe 10 years. I dislike you right now:mad: j/k to each their own.

I just wanted to share some progress pictures of the Right Switch Panel, and it's coming along.. As you might have noticed, I'm putting quite a lot of effort into making this panel as detailed and realistic as possible. Trying to find 3D details in the pictures that I can incorperate into my panel. Alloff this just to make it less 2D and maybe bring some more life to the panel..? .... But why bother you might wonder? (you most likely don't, but I choose to disregard this fact simply because it would ruin my train of thought..!?) Mainly because it is the one panel that's ALWAYS staring you in the face whatever angle you may view the cockpit from. But most importantly because It's on this panel you start in the simulator, and if your lucky you end with it to..! AND you have got time to study the panel in detail while you wait for the APU, ABRIS and such..

Try here: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=04IH4Y7K

Got something for you Mustang :)

I've got'n your point all the way through this discussion, but i already told you that, such a movie you are asking for will most likely be made, in one way or another! :) *My* point with "Project 10" is to promote excitement over a new sim coming, trying to also appeal to the fans that likes to blow stuff up, as well to all who loves aviation in general and so on. Now let's not continue this discussion, we obviously both want the same thing in the end here. ;)

Так точно, Сэр! :)

I am not president :))) I dont know this information. But if i know. i dont say it to you :)

Saki 2010

Одни за реалистичность бьются в кровь, а другие за аркаду ратуют. Странные (в рамках этого симулятора) у некоторых желания, честное слово. Если бесит непроходимость, то бери миссию полегче и учись побольше, делай свои миссии - тренировки. Ну на крайний случай открой редактор и убери сильно опасную технику противника.

not trying to sound negative but .............. this is bloody fantastic !!! very well done GA and ED i think i mentioned it before: CANT WAIT !!! cheers, NotiA10

Dragon, stop replying to this guy! DONT FEED THE TROLLS!

Hi, thanks for your comments. It is much harder as red to complete the storyline but certainly not impossible - You must destroy all units in ops Boxes FOX & CAT and their reinforcements, and all units at FARP ROME. That will win the mission for REDFOR. If you think you have done that, then my advice is you must have left some units for one of the areas, this trigger has been tested many times. This mission is not even sided, unfair? absolutely not. No war or campaign in RL is 'fair'. There is always going to be a side that far 'outguns' it's opponents. - SunTzu - "Only enter battle to engage in a Fight when you know you can win!" So you killed most blue units in the Triangle huh? Well, my question to you is why? and what were they?:thumbup: Version 1.3 will have the units protected in the Mission Editor.