Ala13_ManOWar

*Through the seat of your pants , I must add

Does your CPU/MOBO have an integrated GPU by any chance? That takes RAM memory out from general use and it's set in the BIOS so you can't see where it is. You can check that.

I think you're confusing certain space game which won't probably be ever seen with a flight simulation like DCS is. The hype train you mention happens usually only close to release when you really see people excited because there is something to be excited about, screenshots, videos, manuals, whatever. Yes, that happens. We haven't seen a thing here aside from a few screenshots and that's mostly to calm the waters from those claiming the module won't happen because they don't see a thing. We aren't now in either of those situations, so nobody knows what seven years hype you're talking about .

My understanding, given a hypothetical module wouldn't be available right away, is that we are thinking of incoming modules, F-4, F-8, A-7, MiG-17, etc. In that environment a new MiG-21 variant would be very welcome.

Not to mention, from what you people say about completeness of sceneries, planesets and everything. I believe lately devs in general are trying a different policy with regard to that and they try to give players a bit more than just the module hoping people would find what to do with it. Of course, even though British versions fought in Europe and everything, a Corsair without carrier (not a simple one as we have seen in the screenshots, hence a hell of a lot of work), without either ground and airborne assets, and without a map is less appealing, so it may well be they try to coordinate a bit that so we get a more or less "full" environment for the Corsair and not just the module, if not simultaneously in a short period of time, specially bearing in mind all the things we know being worked on. A Marianas WWII release close or simultaneous to Corsair release plus ground, naval and air assets to crowd it would definitely be awesome!! But M3 keeps being a small team, that's a lot to ask them and if they manage to do that they deserve the highest of the recognitions, which usually isn't seen around here instead of complains. Anyhow, just let them work, they have shown they are doing their best, just let them keep working mates. P.S.: a different thought, if you all remember usually modules aren't released very close one to another (or in sales periods), and we have already some recent releases and if everything goes well a lot more coming this very year. My guess is they (ED here) have to find the right spot to release Corsair without much interference to other modules/third parties and that may well mean we don't see it right away other things are released, who knows…

No, most places doesn't, otherwise why would people complain all the time about updates in this or that module from this or that third party? I recall people's memory is usually quite short and two months of work in this kind of software job isn't that much, at all. I'm awaiting this module as much as anyone, but I'm sure they want to finish and release it probably even more than I want to fly it, not only this one but the others they are bogged with. If they don't say a thing, just keep working, we'll see it sooner than later. On the other hand if they only post screenshots and write on social media maybe they have less time to finish the job, but maybe I'm being gullible and they don't work at all, they don't want to finish and release their modules, and they just sit over piles of money laughing at our wait which apparently is what some people think of third parties, who knows .

I'm sure they are all just awaiting you to speak so they come wherever you're just to give you a heads up because you're special. It's not like they should keep working on their pending modules, or perhaps they don't want to sell their work, eating daily is overrated, yeah .

Supongo que lo añadirán a los módulos de prueba en cuanto salga a la estable y haya terminado el descuento, ya no está el 30% de pre-compra, pero aún tiene un 20. En cuanto salga a la estable eso terminará y seguramente será el momento en que aparezca en los módulos de prueba.

Todos los módulos entran ahí, solo que recién aparecido a veces tardan un poco en ponerlo, pero no creo que tarden mucho ya. El Mosquito y el Mi-24 los pusieron en seguida después de salir, así que cualquier día activan este.

Eso no se sabe, pero no creo que tarde demasiado, no suelen dejar a la gente que solo vuela estable sin el módulo que han comprado durante demasiado tiempo. Los últimos lanzamientos han pasado a la estable bastante rápido.

It's a real pity La-9 was being worked on by Belsimtek years ago, or at least talked about they had some plans, I guess as a fleshing out of a Korean scenery since they made F-86 and MiG-15, but apparently they dropped the idea and was never heard of again.

Also in take off, setting 11:30 to take off and only setting it automatic once well airborne helps control the sometimes wild 109's take off rolls, though it's another thing to take care of from the checklist so probably not the best for people trying to learn if they are bogged down in procedures.

I'm not sure those details are really important or could affect a simulation, at least a simulation to the level we have here. And that's acknowledging the complexity DCS already has, set aside lesser ones. But maybe it does

I'm sure they will as they did with C101.

People like to talk and make a mess, but no rumours at all, from what Aerges said it's a whole package including F1CE, EE, BE and M, it's like the Tomcat (or Phantom eventually) with several versions in the same module. In this case will be released in that order hence that's why CE is first as you saw in the two tutorials already aired. We don't know price tag yet but they haven't ever mention anything about selling single models at different prices or the like, that was only people talking here, nor we know of further versions though devs said it could be possible should they find the correct information, but any other gossip out there we know nothing and it's only guesswork from people.

Not sure, but it looks like what are green numbers under light are luminescent and they glow even when not lit or after being lit. Interesting effect if that's realistic.

Pues que Belsimtek era el equipo de ED que está en Minsk y cuando se abrió el tema de las third parties los hicieron pasar por third party durante un tiempo para que hubiese más opciones y demostrar a otras third parties interesadas en entrar a DCS cómo se funciona y demás. Cuando ya estaba establecido el sistema y había third parties activas con sus proyectos y módulos lanzados ya no hacía falta tener un equipo de "demostración" a parte y esos desarrolladores les hacían falta para otros proyectos, así que simplemente se reincorporaron como parte del equipo de ED que siempre fueron pero en otros proyectos como el Hornet, el Viper, o supongo que el Apache ahora aunque eso ya no nos lo han contado, tiene poco sentido seguir hablando de Belsimtek como entidad separada o simplemente "colaboradores", son ED. No han desaparecido, siguen ahí, pero vuelven a funcionar como parte de ED. Los módulos de Belsimtek ahora son módulos de ED, sencillamente, aunque en realidad siempre lo fueron por mucho que tuvieran un nombre a parte durante un tiempo.

I don't know but maybe they do in the Russian forum.

I'm just saying they are a small non English speaker team, their apparent "lack of communication" has been addressed around here several times, but they aren't going to learn English all of a sudden just because some people complain about it. That's all. The subject you mention, yes, I guess buildings destruction should be possible more or less everywhere on this map, I just haven't tried destroying all of the buildings to know which ones i can and which can't. Anyhow, remember even no speaking English, they use to address issues with their maps so reports reach them sooner or later.

That takes time, think of Hornet or Viper, it would be something alike with regards to complexity, I believe. If you haven't flown any of those before you'll have to study a good bunch of new things.

Or do, it might well be some little thing that is fixed in the next patch, it wasn't broken last week. As I told you, if you fly offline or something where you need ATC, just go stable for now.

That's right, they were working a whole new cooling system for warbirds, but I don't recall it to be released, some things were fixed in the latest patch though like Dora and P-51 engine bugs.

I love how they still don't speak a single word of English but people want them to talk daily or something .

Ok, it was working and now radio in MiG-21 isn't. As Art-J also says, there're some reports for other modules as well, sometimes it happens in OB. It does something, a weird chat message appears, but no audio or actual comms. Also some RSBN appear to be broken. I know comms in general are WIP indeed after Supercarrier release with some new comms, but I don't know it that's the reason here. You can try stable if you need to fly it with ATC, it's on the exact previous patch of OB now, I believe. I mean, don't think it's been like that since 2015 as you said in OP, it wasn't and you just picked a bad time to get back .

I have used comms in MiG-21 with both ATC and AWACS in both offline and online missions as recently as this year and the whole last year or so while I was giving this module a new twist. I don't know exactly what you mean when you talk about an issue since 2015. Could you further explain?