Koriel

I discovered a while ago that out of the whole list of future DCS modules my list actually only had all the multi-crew planes.. any version of the A-6 will be an instant buy again.

Working on my mobile here. I have tried a forum search you no avail. Chuck: I'm really looking forward to the upcoming release of the A-4E community mod. Is it an option for you to create another one of your guides for this particular mod? Apart from a SFM it's got its own systems, like rader and a clickable pit. In quite some respects it's a bit above the default FC3 planes. Just wondering. Tia

I ended up setting a user curve in DCS with a -14 curve. Now the AB kicks in when I push the throttle thru the (modded, ie no lift) detent on my Warthog throttle. It's not perfect, but will suffice for now.

As soo many other things that should have been fixed/added by ED, a simple AB "set" like in Falcon 4.0 would work wonders in DCS. But yeah, searched for an easy fix for the throttle, as the AG kicks in at 40% or thereabouts... sheesh...

Will the "Iceman" be able to land the F-14 on land or the carrier?

Follow up question. I have done the Flag 1 = on, created a new trigger with a 20 secs timer and then on action I have set activate static. It is my intention to activate large smoke and fire after an initial explosion effect. However the static object (Huge Smoke Fire) is active on mission start and I can't set it to 1 Once XXX, NO EVENT -> TIME SINCE FLAG (1, 20) --> STATIC ACTIVATE -> Huge Smoke and Fire Static object Any suggestions?

Top!

Not very impressive.. I get close to those fps on my 1080Ti on a 3440x1440 res. What's your CPU and Mem?

Video has already been removed. But yes, a Bronco in the background ..

I can relate to your reasoning. I do thank you for your other guides.

Any word on wether Heatblur has involved him yet?

And this will on the 7th?

And they're live! Very professional setup!

While I'm a fan of Razbam, I've decided not to get another delta. The Tucano and the F-15E are the ones I'm waiting for..

Wow.... They have told us a date. All I'm asking for is clarification on what can be expected of that date. How's that entitlement? It's a normal request for information. If I deal with customers, I give clear answers to clear questions. (At least that's my goal.) I don't like riding a hype train. It gets very tiresome. I think Cobra847 should stop playing around and grow up. At least ED does it better, they don't tease dates and such.

Why can't they just grow up and just make a plain statement. This is my hobby, the devs should be approaching this as a business. Heatblur is selling licenses to planes. I'd like to buy the next 2 (Yeah... A-6!!) But i'd also like to be dealt with on a professional level.

@Cobra847 Been waiting for the F-14 for years. Have been through enough teasers for now, it really starts to p*ss me off. I've outgrown the years where it would be considered funny for the first couple of times, not so much now anymore. Now there's a "Reveal date". Would it be to much to ask as a current and future customer of Heatblur to be a bit more specific? You are running a business after all. It could be one of those announcement of an announcement. Or an announcement of the the pre-purchase date. It could even be the date where you will actually publish the F-14. So what is it? Please?

I have seen this behaviour as well.

Confirmed.

That is a nice workaround, but doesn't fix the issue in the other control priorities. All I'm asking for is the option to bind a key to either accept or deny a request. I'll ask our serverhost to change the default prio's on the multicrew planes to set equal prio's on all. txs

And I might be mistaken (probably are) about the intake pressure. but I just can't seem to get the lower prop rpm settings.

The keybindings miss an easy command to allow or deny a request for control. When the pop-up appears you should be able to use a key, or hotas input to quickly allow your buddy to take control. In it's current state you can bind the [request aircraft control] to a key, but in order to grant it you have to fiddle with your mouse.

That was a typo, table 3 page 54 uses mmHg so for cruise 1 and 2 they use 735 and 670 respectively, but for takeoff they use 125 (?) I think it should have been 1250. I guess that's the max allowable, so a limitation. I am guessing now but at sea level standard atmosphere (15 degrees C) the max you can expect is just below 1000. So 10 on the guage. My main issue is that with the power set at the numbers I can't get my prop rpm low enough.

First of all, very suprisingly, I just LOVE the -52. It's a whole lotta fun to fly. getting a kick out of it with the multicrew. So I wanted to know the specific powersettings, looked them up on page 54 of the manual. I am unable to get to the propspeed with the associated manifold pressure. ie When I want to fly according to the long range cruise speed, 59% prop, 670mmHg (manual). I can set my pressure to 670, but even with the prop lever all the way aft. my prop rpm won't go below 67% So with prop lever all the way back at cruise-1 powersetting, prop rpm is 71% iso 64 (manual) Max continuous -2 gives me a 71% (within range of the manual, but still with full aft prop lever.) I am also unable to duplicate the max manifold pressure of 125- mmHg, but as I expleined in post #3, I figure it's a limitation and in normal situations you propbaly won't see any pressuers above 1000mmHg, or 10 on the guage.

I commend you for your work. May you keep on doing it for others.. ;-) Like we have Chuck for the guides, and you for the 2/3 way switches..