Hiob

Meinst Du den vielleicht den Kopf im Spiegel? Für head tracking mit trackIR brauchst Du im game selber gar nichts einstellen soweit ich mich erinnere. Das funktioniert per default wenn TrackIR läuft (muss VOR DCS gestartet werden).

That‘s not confusing, CPU is working much harder in VR than in 2D. The VR tax is even bigger for CPU than GPU.

Are you using v-sync?

Only problem is, I don‘t own any WW devices and have nothing left to disconnect. This website is simply a typical MS product - crap…..

Indeed the BE has some advantages to it, that the vacuum cleaners don’t. Including but not limited to an afterburner…. The L-39 is a fine aircraft, I have nothing against it. But when training is your goal you have to make a decision. There have been lethal real world accidents caused (or supported) by the fact that the accident pilot has transitioned from eastern instrumentation to western standards (mainly the attitude indicator). Usually in the DCS environment I have no problem transitioning across aircraft (west and east), however I very rarely fly in real IMC. I did a night flight in heavy clouds across the whole map once in A C-101 (so the whole flight from T/O to landing was IFR). Without AP and the poor inherent stability the DCS FM offers, that was a VERY exhausting and frankly quite scary task. I can easily imagine how a Russian Attitude Indicator would have killed me…..

Then I would definitely go for the C-101. It has one caviat though - it has no AP, only FD. IFR can therefore be very exhausting. (that would be a point for the MB-339 when I think about it. But the systems failure simulation is the real crown jewel of the C-101 if that is your cup of tea.)

The free T-45 could also be an option. It literally IS a navy trainer.... (and therefore carrier capable, which the others are not)

I feel the same. At least we have a thread now. Maybe someone comes up with a solution some day....

Again, that‘s nothing to be dogmatic about, but just as food for thought: Trainers are not only trainers, because they have a second cockpit, but also, because they have manageable performance, are usually not FBW (so that they offer very „basic“ stick and rudder experience to build fundamental skills etc….

Congratulations!

Correct. However, when talked about a "Trainer" aircraft, usually a two seater like the C101 is meant. Of course in a simulator environment you don't need go through classical training. It can be advantageous though. @OP, if I had to pick one. The C-101 would be my pick. Because it is very lovely, well put together simulation.

Totally agreed. And for windows itself I use an offline account. However for MSFS you ned an Xbox account (one and the same)....

I detached every input device (including trackIR) except mouse and keyboard from the system. The issue persisted. Only thing left to try for me is to try a generic wired keyboard instead of my wireless. Maybe MS is punishing me for ditching Edge....

You're not alone with that issue. I have the same exact problem. Exclusively with Microsoft login. I have no solution though. I circumvented the problem by using a password manager and using different devices. Curious about the root cause though.

Who would have ever thought, that DCS would add new official modules faster than Chuck could keep up making guides...... They really should hire him and give him a team by now! In all seriousness: Thank you, Chuck, for your awesome contributions!

That‘s the correct way to do it. Make sure you set up the axis correctly in the device software when you mount it reverse or sideways. So that the input direction matches the effects direction. Otherwise the device wouldn’t know that you swapped axis and the force feedback maybe in the wrong direction. HOWEVER, despite the above being the proper way to do it, you can also swap the direction of force feedback separately from the input axis‘ direction in DCS. Either way, make sure those match.

Absolutely agree. I‘m a sucker for eye candy myself. I would absolutely love a beautiful milkyway. However, there are many strengths and weaknesses in DCS. Getting so worked up because a particular one is currently not on the todo list seems a bit off to me…..

Dude, relax. Do you expect them to do everything everywhere all at once? That‘s not realistic. Many people are already concerned ED is spreading thin with their tasks. Also, you can‘t expect them to have the same priorities as any random user in the forum. Put just ten of us together and we couldn’t agree on the right order of priorities if our life depended on it…. The answer was neither stupid or ignorant, just factual. At least we can relax now and see what is actual coming. (I can think of a lot of things that are magnitudes more important than some eye candy at night btw.. .)

All right and correct. I just want to add there is a way easier way to try out linux Distros. Virtual machines. Of course, when you eventually want to play games and need as much hardware performance as possible you should install native. But to try the look and feel of different distributions and find your way around linux for the first time, I‘d simply put them in a VM.

You need to create or modify a mission in the Mission Editor. There you can place and click an Aircraft for setting it up.

Good, I‘m not the only one confused… Have you tried un-reversing them? (I‘m not joking. I find it kind of random when an axis needs reversing or not. Maybe they switched it around)

Your issue isn‘t quite clear (to me at least). What specifically do you need help with?

If you want to use curves with FFB and it causes issues, I recommend to use the hardware trim option of your FFB stick (if it has one like the Rhino). Works like a charm.

I have to test it. Been a while I flew the Kiowa. But for now, have you tried if the differnt trim options in the settings make a difference in this behavior?

You‘re aware the module hasn’t been released yet?