Jump to content

Lord Vader

ED Team
  • Posts

    1588
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Lord Vader

  1. Hey @gordenjay, thanks for the files. And yes, @itnis right. On its own, the CJTF or any other blue coalition will only share GPS data is the US side is also on that coalition. I am almost sure this is intentional, but I will ask internally as it sounds like a limitation. Thank you for bringing this up.
  2. Hey @Silver_ Although I can understand your personal preference to be that the FCR resumes the SP logic after TMS up (sounds reasonable to me too), if the Maverick WPN page is selected, the current logic does set the WPN page as SOI to track SPI after an initial TMS up. If you feel this is not working according to the actual F-16C Block 50 CCIP logics, please provide publicly available non-classified documentation to @BIGNEWYand we will certainly review it if it needs correction.
  3. Hello @Snakedoc We've analysed your track and concluded two things: The amount of induced compensation for steering is not really that big. It may be a matter of your personal taste but it's actually in line with such an asymmetry you selected to use. Of course you need compensation with such a weight on the right side. You must account for the extra wheel friction on the right side, especially above 20kts as you demonstrated in your track (about 35kts). All in all, the team feels this is working correctly and no change is needed. It's also generally speaking, common sense, that the F-16 should not be too asymmetrically loaded, at least not with such a difference of more than 1000lbs.
  4. Hello @Snakedoc Unfortunately, we cannot commit to changes solely based on other simulations of the type. If you gather information from non-classified public information about this behaviour, please send to @BIGNEWYand we will have a look.
  5. Thanks for the track. We'll add this to our analysis for future improvements. Thanks.
  6. Roger, @Xhonas We'll look into the other items, then. When we fix those we'll look into this one again and check if it is fixed.
  7. Hello @Stroke 3 We've talked in the past about target ROE and how they are currently depicted in our DCS: F-16C Viper. All I can say for now is that the system will be refined in the future, as soon as we clear other priorities. However, I'm almost sure the user is talking about not having any hostile red triangles at all, correlated or not. If that's the case, then my advice for a repair may help him and a track would help too.
  8. Hey there, @buceador We're working on a fix, hopefully it will come in the near future. Some items take a bit longer than expected. But, rest assured, it's not at all forgotten.
  9. Hello @gordenjay That's interesting. So you're saying that the Combined Joint Task Forces BLUE faction isn't getting GPS data? I am sorry but I've just tested this faction and cannot reproduce this. Even if you choose CJTF RED it will still pick up GPS, only not using the same precision keys, unless the mission has "Unrestricted SatNav" option turned on. Without a track, it's hard to say what was set up in the mission you were on. I also cannot see if you're inside an hangar, therefore unable to get a proper GPS satellite signal reception like I explained above.
  10. Hello all It's really important to reproduce a reported issue, that's why we ask for tracks. If anyone can capture this on a track we would appreciate it.
  11. Glad you sorted it out. Keep following the Viper Mini-Updates for further refinements. Our Manual is already undergoing revision and, hopefully, these and other procedures will be addressed for consultation.
  12. Hi @Xhonas It does indeed sound like a bug. We'll look into it internally. Thanks.
  13. Hey @Xhonas I've reported this for internal review. Thanks for bringing this to us.
  14. Hey @BigMotor Just from your description, it's hard to realise what may be happening. Are the bases you're carrying cargo to or from set for Dynamic Cargo? Can you share a track of this situation for our analysis?
  15. Hey @samu Like @Rongor said, it takes some practice to make it work. Just follow the correct procedures and take it slow. Don't, rush it. This is a big bird with small wheels.
  16. Hello @GrEaSeLiTeNiN It's hard to figure out what could be wrong without a track. Can you make a short one with the issue you describe? We've stated several times that George does need to refine its flying skills. So there could be some issues here and there.
  17. Hello @Xhonas Could this be a situation where bump acquisition is preventing another consecutive lock?
  18. Hi @Xhonas We are aware of some issues with the gun mode ranging and are working on a future fix. Thanks for bringing this our attention, nevertheless.
  19. Hey @Ulvar40 It's hard to say what's going on. For example, maybe that server you're on doesn't have AWACS and you can only see donor aircraft and what they donate to the network and they're just not seeing red contacts. Maybe you're not in the same network. We would need to see it happen. For now, have you tried to make a repair on your DCS World? This could be a situation where the symbology is just missing and a repair can fix it. If after that the situation persists, perhaps create a short track and share it here.
  20. Hi @nighteyes2017 I took control of your track and was able to cycle between TGT>AO1>AO2 using TMS right. Please refer to the Viper Mini-Updates here for further information:
  21. Hello again @royphsle I know, this is, however just a cosmetic item and we've been handling other priorities. It sounds like a simple fix, but we have to prioritize other aspects of this module. But stay tuned, a future update will certainly improve it.
  22. Hey @demon702 Yes, I can see what you mean. To be honest, I think this is more or less an acceptable brightness as is. I would a agree it's a bit faint yes, but remember this a projected graphic in the pilots visor, it's not supposed to be too bright or it could interfere with the pilots sight. That being said, have you tried adjusting Gamma levels? I see you're using 1.8, try to increase it to 2.2 (default) and check again. Might not help but 1.8 seems a bit low (for me, at least). Of course this depends a lot on the monitor itself. But try it.
  23. Hey @SKYWARRIOR We would need a screenshot of what you are seeing as we cannot reproduce the issue you describe. Furthermore, make sure your throttle axis is really in max AB position. I would also try to make a repair on your DCS (using the Launcher) just to make sure no older texture/effect is acting up.
  24. Hi @Red Ripper It seems you already have some tips of what you may be doing wrong. After testing again with those suggestions, if you still experience an issue, plase include a short track file of your startup run so we can analyse it.
  25. I see what you mean, I thought your handle was white (non texture) that's why I asked for a picture on your side. Yes, we'll be looking into adding the black stripes and lettering in the future. Thanks. As for the HUD Altimeter switch, we're just reproducing the F-16C Block 50 CCIP standards on our simulation.
×
×
  • Create New...