Mateo

I would like to add that build in DCS Sniper image defocus and quality (also while slew) are far worse than original Sniper image quality - @YoYo post here. It need inestigation for sure. No track needed, dev should re-estimate that image quality. Even simple test, range 10 nm, TV NARO mode 3.0x, just like in the video.

I think it was just an example picture. When you slew even in XR the blurry pic again make it difficult to find the new targets.

No worries. Two weeks...

Any official yes/no/future ?

Thank you, actually it is a great information. Will the control stick move automatically when working together with the SAU (damper)? Will the upper air intakes move automatically? – This question has already been asked on the forum, but I don’t recall the answer

So +2, I've heard exactly the same from former Polish Air Force MiG-29 pilot. He told about responsiveness and added that real MIG has higher damping during landing/flare, which might be very similar feeling to @Fighter29who uploaded above parameters during landing. Cheers !

This made me angry few months ago and also now. It is very bad customer treatment. I have pointed to ED that there are in-game customized cockpit options that doesn't work and they did nothing for few months. Very sad.

So you'd like to tell us now that: The MiG-29A FC3 and MiG-29A FF will share the same aerodynamics, meaning they will use the same flight model (basic aerodynamics) when the SAU (damper) is turned off. However, they will have different flight models when the SAU (damper) is enabled, resulting in a significantly different piloting experience between the two versions. Do I understand it correctly ?

I am happy with new map, but I would really appreciate higher standard of runway shapes/mesh. Currently all runways are 100% flat. Real ones aren't. Regards

I fly regularly with my buddies, several times a week. When we flew together after the last update, we all noticed that our MiG-29s were flying differently, and we had pretty similar impressions. Some time ago there was an update that changed gear and flap drag, and it wasn’t mentioned in the official changelog. Now the changes feel more noticeable, and I suspect that some adjustments were quietly made as part of unifying the flight model FF-FC3

From the biggest to smallest changes: 1. Roll rate as function of angle of attack. Monouverability has increased in roll channel. 2. Pitch rates or pitch moments or pitch damping or drag has changed, I can't clearly say what prrcisely because I can't compare one by one to the previous version, before update. 3. Some yaw damping or yaw-roll coupling has changed. Maybe even more.

It is a bit funny that when they admit FM not 100% accurate, they always add that core FM is most accurate. So what's the conclusions about other modules ? Real pilots have pointed the discrepancies in russian speaking part of forum, ED didn't take it into account for years. I do wait for FF with hope. Regards

Latest update of DCS has changed the flight model of FC3 MiG-29. Very sad ED didn't mention it in changelog and did not confirm that previous flight model needed improvement... Anyway it means they are working with flight model of FF.

@UmamusumeMirage If you were able to travel in time then, and move forward for 1 year you'd be surpriced what the hell... Aim for getting sniper pod and lost all module

This is exactly what I wanted to write down here. Statement is telling nothing.

Hi, As reported by ED, flight model of FF F15C will be initially based on F15C Flaming Cliffs version, could we have an F15C update of flight model in area of ground effect. As reported HERE data is available. Currently ground effect almost doesn't exist. During flare the ground closure have no impact on lift, drag and pith moment. Other Flaming Cliffs aircraft have it done some way (MiG29, Su27, Su25, Su-25T). IRL every aircraft has got some CL,CD,CM changes below the wingspan height. It would be nice before we receive FF that such an issue would receive sort of update. Cheers

I just can't understand what is the point of Heatblur to not inform us in simple and transparent way: GUYS, NOT THIS YEAR, SORRY or GUYS, MAYBE AT THE END OF 2025, BUT EXPECT SOME DELAYS AS ALWAYS or GUYS, STAY TUNED, WE'VE ALMOST DONE MOST OF THE JOB TO RELEASE IT It is simply few words, it is not a secret code of nuclear weapon launch, it is just the simulator full of bugs that few thousands of people pay $ to HAVE FUN, it's not even a GTA VI launch or some other game with really numerous society. I don't get the mysterious secret cloud over the DCS modules.

We are absolutely overwhelmed by Eurofighter exterior in the 2025 and beyond video. No cockpit. No single word. It is time to get some news from Heatblur.

I am really surprised that the video haven't been prepared earlier than publishing date.

Somehow EF on top of 2025 and beyond theme. At least maybe some news will be announced.

To be honest, if a step forward will lead us to such cockpits, I will make one step back or even two to WW2 series of airplanes...

Good news, I think it is not the first time they change things for MiG-29, which aren't announced officialy. BTW I assume they do changes because of works that goes on for FF MiG-29, which is a great news!

Mateo93

If somebody want to use it, you need to replace default livery, and then it will work fine as default. Anyway, if we have build-in-DCS setting that doesn't work anymore after last update it is a dishonor and shame for developer to broke this setting with update and just leave it. Regards, Mat

ED answered to my ticket: