hotrod525

Well, the ordnance itself is in the game since.. a while... i cant remember how many months, but it's in the "atleast 5 month" ball-park as i pass throught encyclopedia pretty much every patch. So "that" plus the fact that ED is weapon master now in DCS, after all AGM130 is basicly a Walleye with more range and a different pod. I'm optimistic let's say that. Also, those are LJDAM GBU-54... i looked at the trailer in 4K for long minutes, and we can see the black laser-seaker at the tip of the bomb. *breath heavily* hYpE iS rEaL!

Hopefully AGM130 make it at release, we saw the bomb and the pod several time in trailers... hopefully in two weeks'

This is probably why we got 3 or 4 different circa for the F15E, because its "super duper dream". Same would apply to the F1 variants... Let's not even talk about Black Shark 3 Frenkeinchopper. I agree with Foggle, asking for antique only for the sake of it, is honestly not cool and will turn away alot of potential sell. Wich Razbam does need. Most downloaded mods have all something in common : modern era, modern things. Most selled module are also those of modern circa. Of course, "old is nice" but it dosent generate as much revenue.

If MAV was Lock, the cross would be full, it is definitly tracking my radar brick, just go try it yourself.

That is not true. Maverick seeker will slave and follow GMT radar lock. Just like the seeker will indeed follow TGP, i just tried it and i've record an instant replay, i'll post the link once YT is done.

you're amazing!

It actually expended infact... they integrated LJDAM and APKWS. IMHO i think Razbam should expend the scope of the loadout, infact, it should be done across all DCS Modules. Purist would have their thing by simply using whatever load out they see fit, more "Role Playing" for different nation / model can be done, and it dosent broke anything for anyone. Key word : expend the scope.

If i may suggest : "Currenthill DCS asset pack directory" with a single thread with all the download link, you would then be able to "arrange them" by type with either text block or post right underneet like "Naval Assets: DDG, Type55, etc", "Ground Assets; HIMARS, Swedish, etc" Anyway, your call, but i think "simple would do it". Good luck mate

@currenthillcould you please make a thread with all your different mod please ? Your doing amazing job but its hard to keep track of all the forum topics

It's more a "mission making related" factor. I get you're point, and yes it is somewhat annoying, but you can delete the point in youre cockpit. So, yes, quality-of-life-wise for you, it's an issue, but "game developpement wise" it's not. All the options / tools are there, that's what i meant. Educating the mission-maker / them getting experience making AH64D missions will somewhat resorb this over time.

If you check "Hide on MFD" the system wont auto-pop the SA page with icon. You can hide most and leave one or two as ref / whatever you'll see fit infact. But its 'not an issue'. EDIT : after-thought, an easy check in the ME in the AH64D option tab would also doe the trick' for not having to hide all units by hand.

It's only a matter of time like most thing in DCS, why people jump to conclusion so quickly...

According to the latest news, "As with the Hornet and Viper, we also plan to add DTC and Link 16 functions to the A-10C II, but this effort will not start until after 2023 given the amount of DTC work that must first happen with the Hornet and Viper. Also, after the Hornet and Viper efforts, we’d like to add a cockpit view pilot." We will someday have it, someday.

From ED newsletter : We believe that 2023 will be a truly exciting year for all, with the introduction of eagerly awaited modules like the DCS: F-4E by Heatblur, DCS: F-15E by RAZBAM, DCS: OH-58D Kiowa Warrior by Polychop, DCS: F4U-1D Corsair by Magnitude 3, DCS: C-130J by the Airplane Simulation Company, new Mirage F1 versions by Aerges, DCS: Normandy 2.0 map by Ugra Media, the DCS: Sinai Map by OnReTech, and more! Please don’t miss to watch our 2023 AND BEYOND VIDEO! So somewhere between now and Decembre 31st 2023.

Are you planning to add 2D radar screen (ala Combined Arms) ? Is it even possible ? Would be great addition if not over complicated

Super epic mod ! Question : How does the Datalink work ? Does it work only between Hawkeye and ship ? Nor can it TX to F18 ? Also, on DDG, the VLS in the back* missile are too low in the silo

I'd pay 80$ for a Super Stallion anyday even if it carry nothing. Can't explain why tough'. PAVE LOW would be somewhat of an epic add, can't explain it either.

Hello everyone, I was woundering if ED plan to delete the "old" (and sometime, very old model) that are duplica ? Let's take the FA18 as example, you got a very low, old model for the A model and a super-high-poly (of course) model for the "C Lot 20", i must admit im not aware of all the disperency between the two, but are they huge enought not to simply use the "high poly" model ? Same apply for the F16, F14, Mirage 2000-5 (yes, i know the M2KC aint a "-5" but still, the work needed to simply add a pylon versus an old model), etc, some missiles are also duplicated, AIM54 leading in this domain. I know that ED is in the making of high-poly variant for some asset, and i also understand that bringing the whole DCS core to a 2020+ standart will take time. But since some models are duplicated, is there any plan to do some "clean up" ? It might not free dozens of gig, but since DCS is easily a 300+ Go game, have some sort of sliming wont hurt. IMHO.

I think that confusion come from the Wags video about either image-auto-tracker nor Perf page we can see he run 1200 rounds and i doubt Wags need "mod" to acheive that

*I think* the Hellfire are bug, well, may be not the missile but the logic behind. I had the same issue as you folks, no countdown and hit and on top of that, i had weird acting missiles lately. EG : I shoot within limits, in HI mode with proper ACQ and LOBL, instead of going 600' (IIRC) the missile was ground skiming doing some weird popup oscillation till they hit something... Or simply get lost. The "i think" part come from the weather, caucase winter, heavysnow with a small wind of few knots, it might have being enought to throw my hellfire off course i dont know. I'm not providing a track yet since i figured that on a few hours long flight.

It seems like our issue wont be address, as it's not even acknoledged. I understand, they have limited ressource, plenty of stuff to do, and so on... But it feel wrong. Anyway. We tried. Sorry folks'.

I've got a question, the UFC BU seems to only work with the radio so far, i tried to enter a LAT/LONG with the BU Page and the system was not taking anything keypress into account, so is it only limited to radio, am i doing something wrong or is it just unfinished/bugged ?

Oh man, we are beyond that point.

I'm sorry to importunate but, @BIGNEWY, anything to say ? Just a small "yeah will bring this up to dev team somwehre between now and two weeks" please

I'm sorry to bring this up and tap the nail again but, does ED even acknoledge this ? If you take a F18 right now, and bring up the NVG, the NVG are center on the HUD, you light up JHMCS and then you're offset