Silver_Dragon

We have problems here: Land units ammo is very simplified, you cant add multiple ammo types or configure ammo by year released. Ammo on Naval vessels has very complex, the example O.H. Perry... Mk13 w/40 munitions, 36 SM1MR Blk VI (reach 40) , 4 Harpoon IB (Max). SAMs and SSM will type change by the years... Missing torpedo launchers (Mk32 324mm TT w/3 Mk46 Mod 5) and changed type by the years. More stuff missing.

are you serious?....

Someone need remember ED has working on to update that AI units, from years ago, and make quality 3D models take time... more if that 3D models coming from the LOMAC/FC Times... That list has growing... as C-17, S300PS, S300V, Su-30 and others, talked on the Russian forum section. The buddy refuelling store funtionality has on plans, and actualy require a complete rework.

Этот вопрос адресован @Yo-Yo. В настоящее время у нас есть Mosquito FB.MVI в DCS World времен Второй мировой войны. В планах команды времен Второй мировой войны симулировать версию для бомбардировки, такую как B.MXI, с ее бомбовым отсеком и позицией бомбардировщика? Или в планах сделать еще один легкий бомбардировщик, типа А-20 Бостом, со своей бомбовой станцией с прицелами, радистом-наводчиком, многомоторной развитой системой управления и топливной системой, хорошим бомбоотсеком и тяжелыми бомбами? Я думаю, что это может открыть новую область, с помощью которой третьи стороны смогут запускать настоящие бомбардировщики и, в процессе, дать возможность игровой системе, в которой игроки играют в качестве пилотов/экипажей бомбардировщиков во Второй мировой войне.

Actualy any module on DCS has suitable.... and a FF bomber has easy to make, the only "handicap" will be a suitable bomber cockpit with propper bomber sight and a propper bomber multicrew (on fact on the A-20, a third cockpit). Good to see the "manual" very complex fuel system and multiprop engine management.

No yet: ED dont talk a suitable bomber module yet, talks a Bf-109G and BoB modules, and the missing KS Me262 after F6F. Miltech 5 has talked a Ju-87 module continue on plans to a future module after Bo-105. Magnitude 3 next WW2 has unkonow after the F4U (rumors of a Zero module) Octopus-G has claimed a Po-2 as WW2 next module. Others 3rd Parties has unkonow is move to WW2. A He111 module by Aerges on a future?, we can dream.

The A-20 has a suitable light bomber, similar to a Mosquito FB M.VI on your version G, Or a A/J version 2-3 members Suitable bomb bay Opens Lead Lease soviet versions with torpedoes. Or implement a Mosquito Bomber version as B Mk.XVI, with bomber cockpit and large bomb bay.

That stament has false: ED The channel map has a WW2 map centred into 1940-44. Remember ED has plans to build Bob modules after PTO (Confirmed by Nick Grey). Ugra Media Normandy 2.0 has centred on 44. About F4U and F6F has a waste, has a complete Nonsense, remember ED has working Marianas WW2 to release with that modules free, centred on Battle of the Philippine Sea / Mariana and Palau Islands campaign, and with secundary Battle of Guam (1941) with propper PTO assets. The only "mising link" actualy, has not present a propper East Front Maps and Assets (to mach with Octopus-G I-16 / La-7 / Po-2), the rest of the actual modules match with actual The Channel / Normady 2.0 Maps. And no, FC WW2 aircrafts dont go to "boost" WW2 (None plans by ED / 3rd Parties), all planed modules has FF, and that has the main distintive makr of ED WW2, has your propper realistic FF modules. And about a Ju-87 Stuka module, continue on plans by Miltech 5 3rd Party, surely after Bo-105 release.

Mig-21bis has builded by Magnitude-3 3rd Party, and Aerges has centred on Spanish Air Force aircrafts. Enviado desde mi CPH2197 mediante Tapatalk

Downloading.

finaly, DCS World 2.9.5 mayor path has release...

Finaly your "minor" patch is here... No wait.... HAS a MAYOR patch

"TM" has the point... the best movement.

F-4E technical report:

No, the only "identical" has the name. VSN F-4B/C has a mod, maked by the comunity, free, with simplified system, weapons and FM, without multicrew, carrier capable, ussing mod tools. Heatblur F-4E, has build by a 3rd party, under a signed contract with ED to make the module and sold them on DCS World, with access to the DCS World develop kit tools (SDK), and develop support by ED. Has Full Fidelity weapons, systems, radar, damage model, FM and full multicrew. If HB make a F-4B/N on the future, that will be carrier capable with the same features of a F-4E, with the propper FF UsNavy systems, and surely if HB implement SC on Forrestal CV, some interesting features. HB F-4 module will be improved with more features apply on DCS World core. About HB F-4E, only need check the "inherent complexity" of the actual FF module: Meanwhile VSN team has making a great work building the F-4B/C, and not bad in a future, has interesting to make a "jump" to some more advences, as convert on 3rd Party with propper modules.

ED never put a Deadline, on fact,was Heatblur, based on a date patch on your pre-release video... the problem, Heatblur dont count with the patch will be a last time problems.

My data about the F-86D/K/L: F-86D Sabre Interceptor Man Rtng: 3.0/2.0 Damage Value: 18 Size/Signature: Small/Small Bombsight: Manual Sensors: APG-37 radar Throttle Setting/Speed in knots Altitude Cruise Full Mil Reheat Low: 480 600 -- Med: 480 566 -- High: 480 530 -- Ceiling: 15125 m Engine Type: TJ Cruise Range: 530 nmi Int Fuel: 1865 kg Additional Fuel Fuel Wt. Range Add. 120 USG drop tank 370 kg 150 nmi Ordnance Loadouts: Payload: 905 kg Off Guns: 24 2.75 inch FFAR • 2 drop tanks • 2 drop tanks, 2 AIM-9B Sidewinder (some export only) Remarks: In Svc: Apr 53 - Jun 61 Flown by ADC Apr 53 - Apr 58, then ANG mid 59 - Jun 61. First 35 had APG-36 radar with E-3 FCS APG-37 radar with E-4 FCS. E-4 FC allowed rear or beam aspect attacks. • 1956 - 60: Converted to F-86L, see separate entry. F-86K Sabre Fighter Man Rtng: 3.5/2.0 Damage Value: 18 Size/Signature: Small/Small Bombsight: Ballistic Sensors: APG-37 radar Throttle Setting/Speed in knots Altitude Cruise Full Mil Reheat Low: 480 530 600 Med: 480 550 590 High: 480 500 540 Ceiling: 14070 m Engine Type: TJ Cruise Range: 510 nmi Int Fuel: 1865 kg Additional Fuel Fuel Wt. Range Add. 120 USG drop tank 370 kg 145 nmi Ordnance Loadouts: Payload: 1390 kg Offensive Guns: 4 M24 20 mm (2.6) • 2 120 USG drop tanks • 2 AIM-9B Sidewinder, 2 120 USG drop tanks Remarks: In Svc: Export “NATO Sabre.” Simplified version for NATO with all-weather interceptor requirement. Served with France, Germany, Honduras, Italy, Netherlands, Norway and Venezuela, starting in 1955. F-86L Sabre Fighter Man Rtng: 3.5/2.0 Damage Value: 17 Size/Signature: Small/Small Bombsight: Ballistic Sensors: APG-30 range-only radar, SAGE data link Throttle Setting/Speed in knots Altitude Cruise Full Mil Reheat Low: 480 530 600 Med: 480 545 585 High: 480 500 540 Ceiling: 15080 m Engine Type: TJ Cruise Range: 510 nmi Int Fuel: 1870 kg Additional Fuel Fuel Wt. Range Add. 120 USG drop tank 370 kg 145 nmi Ordnance Loadouts: Payload: 1200 kg Off Guns: 24 2.75 inch FFAR • 2 120 USG drop tanks Remarks: In Svc: Oct 56 - mid 65 Have 6-3 wing with wing tip extensions for improved agility. Flown by ADC until Jun 60. Flown by Air National Guard units during early 1959 - mid-65. Units on alert during Cuban Missile Crisis.

Normal release times has 1500-1600 UTC.

Reliable and available info to build that specialized version will be a handicap (on fact, ED dont make yet a Nightfighter fighter/escort/intercept yet). Other problem will be simulate the use, tactics and perfomance required to simulate night operations. My info about F6F (with Nightfighter variant). F6F-5 Hellcat Fighter Man Rtng: 3.5/2.5 Damage Value: 16 Size: Small Bombsight: Manual Sensors: 1944 - 150 F6F-3N night fighters with APS-6 Throttle Setting/Speed in knots Altitude Rng Cruise Full Power Low: 160 325 Med: 180 355 High: -- 330 Ceiling: 11369 m Engine Type: RP Cruise Range: 720 nm Int Fuel: 685 kg Additional Fuel Fuel Wt. Range Add. 150 USG drop tank 410 kg 425 nm 100 USG drop tank 275 kg 285 nm Universal 150 USG Drop Tank 370 kg* 385 nm* Ordnance Loadouts: Payload: 1220/2270 kg Off Guns: 6 M2 .50 cal. (1.8) Escort Carrier Loadouts (max payload 1220 kg) • 1 150 USG drop tank, 2 100 USG drop tank • 2 500 lb or 1000 lb bombs, 1 150 USG drop tank • 6 5” HVAR, 2 100 USG drop tank, 1 150 USG drop tank • 6 5” HVAR, 2 500lb bombs, 1 150 USG drop tank • 6 5” HVAR, 2 11.75” Tiny Tim rockets • 6 5” HVAR, 3 250 lb or 500 lb bombs • 3 250 lb or 500 lb bombs Fleet Carrier Loadouts (max payload 2270 kg) • Any escort carrier loadout • 2 2000 lb bomb, 1 150 USG drop tank • 1 Mk13 torpedo, 2 100 USG drop tank • 6 5” HVAR, 2 2000 lb bomb, 1 150 USG drop tank • 6 5” HVAR, 2 11.75” Tiny Tim rockets • 6 5” HVAR, 1 Mk13 torpedo, 2 100 USG drop tank Remarks: In Svc: Apr 44 • The universal 150 USG drop tank was useable on any US Navy aircraft from July 1945 onward. On the Hellcat, however. it caused more drag than the Hellcat 150 USG tank. The universal tank’s actual fuel capacity is 410 kg, but for game purposes this is reduced to denote the extra drag from its poor installation on Hellcat. Other aircraft had no drag issues with this drop tank. This is the only 150 USG droptank available starting in Jan 1947. • Mk13 torpedo wa not used operationally due to testing taking longer than anticipated. All large Japanese ships were sunk by July 1945, when this weapon would have entered service. The F6F-5 could not carry bombs while carrying the torpedo. • Due to their short deck length, the F6F-5 could not take off from escort carriers with a full 2270 kg payload. • Note: Performance is based on aircraft with calibrated instruments. Most F6F Hellcat’s instruments understate the maximum speed. These erroneous speeds are still reported in most books. • Very rarely carried bombs of sizes other than 1000 lb. • Many, but not all, F6F-5N aircraft were fitted with 4 0.50 Cal M2 mgs and 2 20mm M2 cannon with an Offensive Gun rating of 2.4. • Post-WWII variants include the F6F-5P photo recon with standard gun armament.

Someone have here from Flanker 1.0....

Best video ever (TM), and no "Drama"...

The deadline was posted by Heatblur, no ED... ED dont put deadlines from many years ago. And now other 3rd party has posted "Two weeks TM" to dont hold on the "Drama".

and someone 24...

Sure, but that the normal "Release Drama TM"...

The notes on DCS World simulator, coming with the patchs... all modules required a patch, not viceversa. And all modules release, require a patch.