Silver_Dragon

Someone have here from Flanker 1.0....

Best video ever (TM), and no "Drama"...

The deadline was posted by Heatblur, no ED... ED dont put deadlines from many years ago. And now other 3rd party has posted "Two weeks TM" to dont hold on the "Drama".

and someone 24...

Sure, but that the normal "Release Drama TM"...

The notes on DCS World simulator, coming with the patchs... all modules required a patch, not viceversa. And all modules release, require a patch.

First was "We dont like beta version 15-20 days patch but has unstable and need to wait to Stable to fly". Now "We dont like Stable version but need wait excesive time and has blocking bugs with need delay them"....

ED has confirmed the Mig-17F has a FF module, no a FC-3 module... The 3rd parties has making modules with the more available info, if you dont like them, ok but we dont go to crush a module, or brame to a ED and/or 3rd party with not have making a "expecific version / year". By now, that planned / released version has useful to use on the Vietnam scenery, include if not math with the scenery.

What part of "DCS World specific patch version ahead of actual version, with F-4E enable" has your dont understand?. That is not a MINOR core update.

The patchs has planned by ED, no the 3rd parties (the "deadlines" has none to do here), and as repeat, 3rd parties has none control on a DCS World release, major or minor, only ED.... More with a blocking bug with will affect to the core or / and sofware / hardware / other module can break the simulator (the actual situation). The module releases no only required the integration with the core, require some security archives hardcoded.... and that has no over control of a 3rd party. That is not a magic botton "on and off" to the purchasers, that has enabled by the ED DCS World autentification servers with points to specific path versions. The Youtube versions has no only a "install the F-4E module and fly them, to angry the costumers" .... That has DCS World specific versions, no related with the actual DCS World release version, with have integrated the F-4E (The same version with see on the Wags videos), some develop patch ahead, to develop only. Someone remember with Bignegy, Wags or other members of ED team talking about 4-5 DCS version instaled for Testing / Develop proposes?

AI units has not eye candy, that comming with the same weapons of the modules. That is not a cake slide.

Aernes F-104G has a 65-66 versión aircraft, no a post Vietnam aircraft. HB has planned a early A versión 74-75, capable to use them on late Vietnam war. A-6E we dont know the exact sensors and equipment yet. Meanwhile the actual F-4E has post Vietnam, HB can make a Vietnam version. Red Start Simulations has confirm Mig17F has a Full Fidelity module. And remember, we have some FF modules, outside FC-3 on DCS World. Enviado desde mi CPH2197 mediante Tapatalk

All 3rd party modules require a DCS World release patch version, under ED control. 3rd parties has none control over a module release and need send the module data content to ED to integrate them on the release version / updates on any new patch. Remember the last newsletter: Remember the module manager on Standalone version has under ED servers, and that require the same version to add and update the modules under a specific path (that is not MSFS). DCS Active branches... with integrated ED/3rd Party modules. That patch has none exclusive of the HB F-4E, surely has more content from ED (AH-64 new funtionality and other ED modules), bugfix, etc, and others 3rd Parties content as the Massun92´s Asset Pack - Official, and other 3rd party updates, bugfixes and campaigns.

Marianas WW2 / F4U + PTO assets / F6F + new units to Assets pack has none talk about release yet. I think on late Summer / Early Autum. By now, we dont have any video from cockpits by Wags...

What "poor comunitacion"?

Specific DCS Develop versions, no a real release version with a temporal key, only available to review / youtube video making / adversiting. Many of that "F-4E modules" will be wipe out the "module" with the release version path has enable and DCS update to the necesery version, requiring purchase a new module code to use them.

Has some points, Infantry has new animations on progress, but actualy ED dont talk about a "infantry" Damage Model. Other point has about the missing of fragmentation on weapons (on progress by ED). We dont know yet the features of capabilities of airbrust. Actualy the Mk-80 series has none implemented a fuze extensions to simulate airbrust, and the DSU-33 has none compatible with that bombs. Has many points about the use yet of that bombs vs troops.

WW2 Assets pack has now a Ju-88 torp... with capable from bombing on the bomb bay or wing bombs. By now, has the only axis bomber on the Assets pack yet.

ED helos and modern aircraft continue use old damage models from LOMAC / FC. ED continue working on implement the DM tested on WW2 on modern content. Now we have waiting about news over there.

And the problem IS? Enviado desde mi CPH2197 mediante Tapatalk

24 horas for now.

Meanwhile has no part actualy of ED/3rd Parties, remember I maintain the "Unoficial Roadmap" and follow the module develop. Normaly AI units by ED and 3rd parties has make by the propper model or module on develop, no more aditional, except if ED and 3rd party talk about aditionals AI units on progress. Example: ED has a line of AI units on progress: To update old Lomac/FC units to actual standars Released (2024): B-1B, B-52H, S-3B, S300, etc On progress: Aircrafts: C-17, CH-47F (By propper module), F6F (By propper module), il-38 May, Mig-29A (By propper module), SH-60B, Tu-95MS, Tu-142, Tu-160, etc Infantry Georgia 2010-20 AK infantry soldier, Russian 2010-20 AK infantry soldier, Russian 2010-20 AK parachute soldier, Usa 2010-20 M-4 infantry soldier (Show on CH-47F video). Ships Vehicles WW2 Assets Pack On Progress ETO/PTO Units Aircrafts Ships Vehicles About 3rd parties. FlyingIron only confirm the A-7E, nothing more, and no more AI Units, as other 3rd Parties. Heatblur has confirmed the A-6E module, the propper A-6E & KA-6D AI units and missing two aditional Forrestal class CVs, and has plans to make a J-35J Draken AI to the AJ-37 module Meanwile the only 3rd party working on a propper "assets packs" has: Dekka (Chinnese Assets Pack). Magnitude 3 (PTO Units assets pack). Massun92’s Assets Pack (Base Units asstes pack) RAZBAM (South Atlantic assets pack) About them, can we expected aditional units by time to time. The problem about making aditional AI units, has the 3rd parties require build a "AI units team", outside of Modules and maps teams, to make that aditional stuff. That require time, resorces and personal to make propper assets, and reach the quality standars by ED.

Has some aircrafts modules of "Vietnam Era", presents & incoming: A-1H (Crosstail Studios) A-6E (Heatblur) A-7E (FlyingIron Simulation) F-4E (Heatblur) (Naval version claimed to a future) F-8J (Magnitude 3) F-100D (Grinnelly Designs) F-104G (Aerges) Mig-17F (Red Star Simulation) UH-1H (ED) Others with will math released. F-5E (ED) No propper version E, but will math. F-14 (Heatblur) on progress build early version. Mig-17PF (RAZBAM) no propper versios (require a S) but will match Mig-21bis (Magnitude-3) not propper version but will match Vietnam Map has confirmed by ED, has only a matter of time (as Korea).