Silver_Dragon

Surely many folks will like purchase a "free" simulator, ever a ever, only under a wall of Payware to get a "update" core... That dont go to get the core updates more faster.

None vehicle on DCS World has realistic but all vehicles on DCS come from LOMAC times has over simplified... specialy with has none has a track / wheel phisics or suspension, transmission, engines or realistic crunk as WW2 airplanes, same situation with your damage model and armour. None of them has build on the core of DCS and CA never was planned to make them. We need remember with the player always put all vehicles on situations with drive by terrains never prepared by a tank.... as drive down by a stepped downhill or intent cross a building. The terrain has on the same situation as the "indestructible adamantium trees, fences and walls", never coded to break with a vehicle hit them. The talked Wags plans to a "tank module" will change them on a future, but I dont expected with the ED team improve CA to a realistic tank simulator, that will maintain simplified and make some improvements, but not more.

The exiting DCS engine has noting to do with flanker. The Flanker engine was a old engine, no based on Direct X (SuperVGA) Lomac was engine based on 8.1 engine. DCS World (2012) was based on Dx9 engine. Update to Dx11 on version 1.5 on 2015. Multithreat / DLSS / FSR on 2.9 on 2023, Incoming Vulkan engine.

By now, I only expected M3 make a WW2 version, no a initial Cold War version. More Essex-Class info:

Grinnelli F-100D

Polychop Discord

The necesary working from build a FPS system (No the Pseudo CA System), has outside from any Free content. You need integrate on the core some new technology and making that realistic will take years. That is not export the Unreal engine / BIS engine on DCS. Has building the constructiion blocks, and as the SC, has no free build them.

ORBX Discord Kola map: Article on Stormbirds https://stormbirds.blog/2024/04/28/thirty-seconds-of-dcs-kola/

ORBX has only moving on your Discord (and some posts on your forum) and actualy, has none comunications on ED forums, surely await the map release. ORBX discod: https://orbx.to/discord

ED CA never was planned as a FPS (or a SB killer)... was only a "UK Army JTAC trainer" converted to DCS... put comparations with AAA, COD, ARMA (Reforger has a pain) etc has a none sense. The actual "FPS" need rebuild from scratch, put aside from CA and reworking the core features, the TDK and making FPS features by a exclusive team over 5-10 years as the "Vulkan / Whole World" technology. The "first-rate military flight sim" will maintain without problems meanwhile ED continue expand the core, and the "market" has none interest on a ED FPS without has none official.

Actualy a Tactical Commander on CA can control: Air Units (Helos / Aircrafts) Land Units (Vehicles, Artillery, Tanks, Infantry, etc). Sea Units With that units we can: Place Waiponints (Air / Land / Sea) Assign Targets (Air / Land / Sea) Change Speed (Air / Land / Sea) Change Altitude (Air) Change ROEs (Air / Land / Sea) Change State (Land / Sea) Change Formation (Air / Land) Change Depth (Sea) Stop Attack (Air / Land / Sea). Restriction (Land) Unussed? Take Control (Air / Land). Units on First Persons: Some Vehicles (IFV, Tanks, Artillery) Command Sams and AAA (Only individual from sights / radar 2D console, no clomplex systems). Some Manpads infantry units, no infantry. JTAC view with limited control and no radio complex features.

Remember the source files of the Hawk was never provided by VEAO to ED. Without that files, the product cant be updated and turn unusable on the simulator.

Essex (SCB-27A) was on 53-59, Yorktown, Hornet, Randolph, 58, Bennington, Kearsarge, Oriskany, Lake Champlain. Straight flight deck. Essex (SCB-27C) was on 55-57, Intrepid, Ticonderoga, Lexington, Hancock, Bonhomme Richard, Shangri-La. Dual Flight deck (Straight + angle deck). Essex (SCB-125) was on 55-58, angle deck. Essex (SCB-144) was on 61-66, angel deck and sonar. That modifications was after Korean War. Actual M3 Essex fit with a Korean scenery.

P-51 Mustang, F-86 Sabre, Mig-15Bis by ED. F4U coming by Magnitude 3, as a Essex Carrier capable. A-1D comming by Crosstail Studios (AD-6/A-1H) PRC/NK La-7 / Soviet Po-2 by Octopus-G Korea Map has planned by ED (on a future) with surely some soviet assets (T-34/85 + others talked on the russian forum).

The actual plans has Pacific (F6F and other Pacific modules) and West Europe (Bob module) by Nick Grey, and on the future make some Soviet forces assets by the Russian Forum. Mig-15Bis has present. Octopus-G La-7 and Po-2 (and surely An-2) was present on Korean War. The others was il-10 (1944), La-9 (1946), La-11 (1947), Tu-2 (1942), Yak-9 (1942) & Yak-18 (1946).

ED was very clear, ED dont go to make Assets content meanwhile dont move to the East Front, and actualy has none plans to East Front WW2.

Kola and FC-2024

OH-58D window release is end of May, early June 2024 (Polychop Discord).

Aerges has centred on Spanish Air Force aircrafts, and that aircrafts nevera fly on them. i think has very unlike without available sources and documentation. Enviado desde mi CPH2197 mediante Tapatalk