upyr1

I grabbed it from wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beechcraft_C-12_Huron

This should at least be AI looks cool

thanks

There are a lot of differnt classifications out there so I figured WWII and Korea

both sides of the Korean war used a lot of World War II leftovers which is why I stated that they should be the primary focus. I'd live a IL-2/10 module cool I can't wait to see it in DCS

I am all for a Korea map(s), I'd also love more Soviet WWII early cold war assets. As I keep pointing out we havethe I-16 and Mig-15 and the upcoming LA-7 but we lack the supporting assets for a decent mission. I'd love to see ED start adding Soviet WWII assets to cover as much of the period between June 1944 (introduction of the LA-7) to June 1953 (the end of the Korean war). I figure the cut off dates for a priority are the asset must be in service by June 1944 and retire no earlier than june 1950

I expect most people are like that. As for the issue of variants I'd like to see 3 or 4 flyable. The original RAF variant Possibly a B model (depends on how much the USAF and RAF model differ) 57G - night hawk BI6

That will be awesome.

Please let me bring to your attention a comprimise based on the immortal words of Farokh Bulsara I want it all More modules are a good thing. Also Nevada to simulate late 1970s and early 1980s red flag excersices. They aren't big enough but the Marianas have jungle

Here are the theaters we could use them in Suez- wrong time period but they RAF used the Canberra during the Suez crisis South Atlantic- I'm not sure when the RAF canberras were retired but ironically the Argintine Air Force used them during the war Kola Peninsula- wrong period but the Swedes used them in the 1970s The up coming Germany map- Just like the Kola map the Canberra would have been involved in a cold war gone hot scenario.

yes.

Ideally that's the path to go with the AI. I'd also agree with having at leas 1 RAF and one USAF variant. I'm thinking the B2 and 57B were basically the same. If you had to pick at least one RAF and one USAF what would you select? If you had to pick at least one RAF variant what would you pick?

that would be the ideal situation. If we can't have that then which one(s).

Yes that should be the default

An FF Canabera would be cool. The next question would be what version(s)?

I'm not saying its combined Arms II is coming out. All I am saying is the following Wags said something about it in a video There is a lot going on at ED we don't know about for the sake of the thread, we should at least be willing to pretend that Wags may have brought up Combined Arms II as a hint of ED's plans. (don't forget he's dropped hints before) I'd like to have combined arms II with as much detail as possible I'd rather have modules over an asset pack I'm not going to place any bets on this happening or not. It's the same situation with the F-111B, which I lead with the assumption that there was enough data for the F-111B, and you went on about realistic reasons an F-111B module or mod might not happen (HB licensing and other issues). It is important to remember this is the wishlist, and at least in theory it is supposed to be the place where we communicate with ED about what we would like to see in DCS. There might be 10 million valid reasons that X might never happen and its up to ED to decide if X will happen. So let's get back to the topic which is what you would like to see added to DCS in the way of cold war assets

I'm treading it as "not publicly planned yet" as there appears to be quite a bit going on behind the scenes with ED we don't know about. For example, the F-35 module. Which brings back to the topic of the thread Combined Arms DLC. As I have stated multiple times in the past when/if we get Combined Arms II I'd love for them to do away with the asset pack(s) and replace them with combined arms module(s)/DLC as ED has no problems putting an asset in DCS core when a new module comes out.

I accidentaly wrote III but I believe Wags mentioned Combined Arms II in this video he says yes but the question is when

If any version of the MIg-25 or 31 can be done it would be awesome. I don't expect to see the MiG-31 as anything else besides a mod

I plan to buy the asset pack. I'm not entirely opposed to them, just prefer modules. IMHO I think if someone buys a Warbird but has no plans for the WWII asset pack(s) then they are a fool and they are an even bigger one if they want a map. I want to see it in the change log after an update. Which is the reason that my requests for naval ops includes adding the necessary changes to DCS core.

It might not be the right time period for 1st generation jets but we do have Europe coming up.

The issue, is that a lot of people don't like DLC asset packs, because if you don't have it you can't join a server. So my suggestion was to abandon DLC asset packs like the current WWII in favor of modules. I know there is a lot that has to be done I want ED to work on it

Before I try any testing I was wondering if anyone with ED could answer this. I know the HTS matters for human pilots but does it matter for AI pilots?

This is why I say the answer is a semi-historic mode, which will try to limit us to the most period correct version possible, which could be the existing model without things like the JMHC