Jump to content

upyr1

Members
  • Posts

    4315
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by upyr1

  1. Ideally that's the path to go with the AI. I'd also agree with having at leas 1 RAF and one USAF variant. I'm thinking the B2 and 57B were basically the same. If you had to pick at least one RAF and one USAF what would you select? If you had to pick at least one RAF variant what would you pick?
  2. that would be the ideal situation. If we can't have that then which one(s).
  3. Yes that should be the default
  4. upyr1

    C-12

  5. An FF Canabera would be cool. The next question would be what version(s)?
  6. I'm not saying its combined Arms II is coming out. All I am saying is the following Wags said something about it in a video There is a lot going on at ED we don't know about for the sake of the thread, we should at least be willing to pretend that Wags may have brought up Combined Arms II as a hint of ED's plans. (don't forget he's dropped hints before) I'd like to have combined arms II with as much detail as possible I'd rather have modules over an asset pack I'm not going to place any bets on this happening or not. It's the same situation with the F-111B, which I lead with the assumption that there was enough data for the F-111B, and you went on about realistic reasons an F-111B module or mod might not happen (HB licensing and other issues). It is important to remember this is the wishlist, and at least in theory it is supposed to be the place where we communicate with ED about what we would like to see in DCS. There might be 10 million valid reasons that X might never happen and its up to ED to decide if X will happen. So let's get back to the topic which is what you would like to see added to DCS in the way of cold war assets
  7. I'm treading it as "not publicly planned yet" as there appears to be quite a bit going on behind the scenes with ED we don't know about. For example, the F-35 module. Which brings back to the topic of the thread Combined Arms DLC. As I have stated multiple times in the past when/if we get Combined Arms II I'd love for them to do away with the asset pack(s) and replace them with combined arms module(s)/DLC as ED has no problems putting an asset in DCS core when a new module comes out.
  8. I accidentaly wrote III but I believe Wags mentioned Combined Arms II in this video he says yes but the question is when
  9. If any version of the MIg-25 or 31 can be done it would be awesome. I don't expect to see the MiG-31 as anything else besides a mod
  10. I plan to buy the asset pack. I'm not entirely opposed to them, just prefer modules. IMHO I think if someone buys a Warbird but has no plans for the WWII asset pack(s) then they are a fool and they are an even bigger one if they want a map. I want to see it in the change log after an update. Which is the reason that my requests for naval ops includes adding the necessary changes to DCS core.
  11. It might not be the right time period for 1st generation jets but we do have Europe coming up.
  12. The issue, is that a lot of people don't like DLC asset packs, because if you don't have it you can't join a server. So my suggestion was to abandon DLC asset packs like the current WWII in favor of modules. I know there is a lot that has to be done I want ED to work on it
  13. Before I try any testing I was wondering if anyone with ED could answer this. I know the HTS matters for human pilots but does it matter for AI pilots?
  14. This is why I say the answer is a semi-historic mode, which will try to limit us to the most period correct version possible, which could be the existing model without things like the JMHC
  15. However if they go through and replace the legacy Eagle with the FF Eagle they can sell them to people who have the FF Eagle too
  16. With the F-4 I'd love to have the EC-121 so we can fly like it's 1972
      • 1
      • Like
  17. I'd like to start with a mod, my question is what is know about the flight data
  18. In the past I have suggested using Combined Arms modules as a way around the asset pack problem. Step one would be Combined Arms III- ideally I'd love to see something full fedeity. However if all we get is more like flaming cliffs with tanks I'd be happy as well. Just fix the VR issue (have us seated in the tanks), improve the AI, and models. Then do add ons which focus on different era and theaters. Then do the same thing with ships DCS: Fleet ops
  19. My list based on how I divide the cold war and the era I associate aircraft with Early Korean war / Stalinist era (1945-1953) Anything my preference for the Red for would be for aircraft and other assets with service lives that overlap with the I-16 and MiG-15 first Blue for A-26 is needed, since we have the WWII asset packs anything in the way of early jets Eisenhower / pre-vietnam era (1953 - 1963) Anything the F-84f and B-47 are my main must haves for the USAF, Hunter Hawker, is the must have for the UK Mystre is the must have for France IL-28 is the must have for the Redfor Vietnam Era (1964 - 1975) USAF B-52D, B-66, F-105, EC-121, KC-135, AC-47, B-57, F-111 USN A-3, A-5 British V bombers, Canberra (I know already listed) , bucaneer, France - anything Red For- anything
  20. I thought my thread name was funny
  21. I'd like both- I don't care which we get first. The F-84F would be great for the F-100, MiG-17,
  22. The Korean war is just lacking
  23. The thunder jet would be great for Korea
×
×
  • Create New...