Corrigan

Well someone on Hoggit is eating a sock.

If there are developers that think in that way, it's a shame. I don't think that's what most of us want from DCS. When I want symmetric and balanced competition instead of realism I play Counter-strike.

I've noticed that it's very hard to fly uncoordinated, even without any rudder input at all. Is that related to this? And does the aircraft require that little rudder in real life too?

I was just commenting on the battle of semantics in which you were engaged and, from my perspective, losing. I think it'll be released soon too! Hopefully I'll be procrastinating next week away and learning French one switch label at a time. Unofficially, of course.

Grunf, you fiend. Get a hold of your life! GET A GRIP, GRUNF.

I'd call that pretty unofficial.

Wow. Either that metal is far too brittle or your ipad is made of something entirely different than my samsung. Good luck with finding that part.

I can only assume you drew that. Must be nice to know that you can always draw balls for a living if this whole flight sim thing doesn't work out.

Since you bring it up, it should say säkringspinne. You seem to speak German so I'm sure you understand the difference between Ä and A.

Alright, so it should clearly be LÅSNING which is the Swedish for locking. The other stuff baffles me slightly. I'm pretty sure it should be FÄLLNING since "fallning" isn't a word, but that's what it says. ARMERING is correct, but I have no idea what RECOKING should be, since that's not a word (in English) either.

Not sure how to handle this. Pls send help.

I can't find the hotkey for showing it, anybody know?

Well, I just released a Mirage flight sim module. Does that, uh, make you want to release a Mirage flight sim module? This is a good plan

Should probably be fällning and not fallning, though?

LNS have, by the quality of their work and of their interaction with us normally, in my opinion, earned this break. If it was some other company, I might be a bit less happy about the radio silence, but for these guys, I have no problem giving them this.

I don't know that much about helicopters, so maybe someone else can let me know whether this is plausible or not: maybe your collective was set so high that the rpm fell below what's needed to power the alternator, and that caused the pitch stabilisation to disconnect?

Yeah, fully agree. I would probably have bought it anyway, once it was out and had some reviews, but I pre-purchased just because you're so good with communicating and showing us progress. Very much appreciated.

What if ground effect is modelled, and flying under the ground (=bridge surface) is messing something up?

Hey Zeus, why is the artificial runway in the air above the actual runway, and not closer to the ground? Just a temporary bug in your current build, or maybe a feature from the actual aircraft?

Fantastic! That's some seriously nice 3D work. Day 1 purchase, obviously. This together with the AJS 37 will suddenly let us do some pretty convincing Swede stuff!

Is there anti-skid for the brakes? Is losing control when braking at higher speed (90+ KIAS) realistic? I ask since some of the other modules (A-10C, F-15C) have some brake realism issues. It looks amazing! I really can't wait.

Low-and-fast strike aircraft are probably the coolest thing there is.

I'd say it's almost certainly not intended. The guys in that A-10 thread (http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=154018) seem to have linked it to a weird problem with landing too.

Gentlemen, this is a bug report. Move it to another thread, thanks.

Ah right, I thought you were responding to the question about performance. I also don't like the look of the (rather jagged) dynamical shadows, that's why it would be nice to be able to choose which objects we want them enabled for.