SkateZilla

What seems to be the problem?

Early WIP in their testing build, doesn't translate to "Its already in Sim", if ED said "Coming Soon" it would not likely be in the release build.

My mod is not affiliated w/ the F-5E Remaster, for the record.

It's an Expansion Mod I am working on, originally the Wing Tanks Mod, has been expanded to Wintip tanks, Drop tanks, ILS/VOR, VHF, ADF Antennas and Export, Skoshi AAR Probes. But it was back burnered by some other priority projects in progress, w/ F-5E 2024 being public, I will likely hold the mod until after the remaster is released, and modify the Expansion mod to use either Legacy or Remastered files. I've already started working on re-building weapons table, and giving AI Export versions AGMs etc etc. And like I've been doing for other projects I'm working on/partnering with, This mod will install 100% in the SG folder and not have to be merged, managed, removed, re-installed after a DCS Update or break IC. Discussion / Updates on that mod were posted here: As for the ADF Antenna on the Stab / Spine? Brazil has those.

Ahem:

A-10C and KA-50 Both got revamps already, they were the 2 oldest DCS modules.

Setup the DDI's like you would w/ a Flat Screen, then Add: VR_allow_MFD_out_of_HMD = true to your monitor configuration lua.

Autoexec.cfg in \Saved Games\DCS Add: disable_write_track = true

2.9.10, 2.9.11, 2.9.13. .9 is not the last number in Minor or Sub Versioning. MAJOR . MINOR . SUBVERSION . REVISION

Ok because I have the tech docs for the SUU-63s *( And EVEN SUU-79s)* that pretty much conclude the BRU32/A adapter is not capable of mounting the LAU-127x/A Rails directly. The SUU-80s on the super hornet's can mount the LAU-127x/A, via the ADU-773 Adapter. The Swiss Hornets have a low drag A2A Pylon, that looks similar to the SUU-80 w/ designed for AAM, but it's got a different designation, and they are the only one's that have it, as their hornets were configured for 9Gs and A2A Only Primarily.

Correction, the Community needs to thank Galinette, who recoded the M2K, for Free, regardless of being a contractor under RB. Not to mention they were the ONLY group charging for Individual Strike Fighters Aircraft Mods ~15-20 bucks, and they didn't even have to model cockpit systems at all.,

Please provide proof, because I've never seen a Legacy hornet, w/ a single AIM-9/120 Rail on SUU-63x/A, with the only exception being for the Switzerland, who paid for a low profile pylon similar to the SUU-80 on the super hornet, that has the ADU Interface required to attach an LAU-127E/A or A/A directly to the Pylon, which is mounted on the outboard stations. Allowing them to deploy units w/ 4x AIM-9s or 2 AIM-9s and 2 AIM-120s etc etc.

AIM-120/9 on LAU-115C by itself is not realistic. LAU-115C doesn't have required ADU interface to hook an AIM-120 or AIM-9 to that Launcher directly. It would be on a LAU-115C+LAU-127x2, if you only want one, it's usually loaded on the outboard rail of the LAU-115C+127x2. In addition, The SUU-63 Pylon also does not have the ADU interface required to load the LAU-127A/A directly to it like it does on the SUU-80/Super Hornets.

As I said though, the features being added, replacing those in early newsletters, are taking the Hornet to more Mid/Late 2000's.

Mid-2000s (2003–2006), So a few months due to fleet deployment delays and SCS Updates. Early 2000s is literally 2000/2001

Umm, the ATFLIR is Newer than the Nitehawk... so we actually went from early 2000's to later 2000's

There's a specific reddit page that likes to do "expose" articles.

LRIP used Legacy hornet procedures w/ some notes from Boeing for modifications, LRIP and Early Block I's were essentially transitional jets. That being said, the Tacman for the Legacy is available if you fill out and submit the formal request and it's approved, so likely ED has done this as at one point or another there was an agreement of some type w/ Boeing. The UFCD as a 3rd MPD was not enabled until later software updates, so LRIP jets only had the UFCD, the MDI Toggle wasn't enabled until later updates. The entire Super Hornet cockpit was (sans a few instrument panels and EFIE) transplanted into late block Legacy hornets for Finland and Switzerland.

I've spoken w/ both Pete and Ells after VEAO Left, that is the Long story short version, which is why it was labelled "allegedly", I can't really go into specifics beyond that publicly.

Messages and Emails posted elsewhere confirm that.

There's a delta being worked on by IDF Modding team, It will use the charlie binaries and operate the same way their sufa does. w/ me helping/working w/ CJS, I may offer to help IDF w/ the Delta as well.

Unless you're Ron Zambrano or ED's legal team, you don't know, I don't even think the RB Devs know the full story, because Ron and the Devs have posted conflicting statements multiple times on their own discord. Assumptions/Thoughts based on Expose' articles and such are all based off rumors and mis-interpreted leaked messages that were used and manipulated to create a narrative. No different than news networks slicing and dicing camera phone footage to make one party appear to be the clear aggressor for public outcry. Stirring drama and kool aid gets those sites hits and ad revenue etc, and attention, the more attention they get the more of a complex the owners get. The fact that someone spends most of their free time doing investigative articles on every move ED/One Company makes raises eyebrows, though I'll give them kudos for commitment. But ED's operations aren't exactly Area51 in the 70s level of material... you'd get more hits on exposing EK Waterblocks at this point. Like does the public really need to know or care what type of toilet paper is in Nick's office bathroom?, Nope. Is one party clearly dissolved of any mis-steps? definitely not, there were things on both sides that led to the situation being as it is. But post public disclosure, one party's operational tact is nil, and the constant leaks, disclosures, allegedly incriminating statements etc by that party, likely dont make any type of professional negotiating easier. In-so-facto, I was labelled an ED sales person by RB's own devs, despite not taking sides, but defending myself in their discord, so it is what it is. from an outsider perspective, just by what's publicly visible, and removing any knowledge or assumptions I have via testing/developing, just as an individual looking at both parties. ED's house is closed off and silent, and Razbam's house is a non-stop Frat Party.