ApoNOOB

Does this mod currently work for anyone or is it broken only for me? :D

Not going to happen, see the million of whishlist threads about ingame VOIP from the pre SR era. :)

That would be really awesome, I have it for a really long time and never got to use it since no public servers have it.

Does mission file need edit for the Sidearms or are they not in for a reason? Sorry if this was asked already. :) edit: Farps do have Sidearms, yay!

Harrier should be able to carry troops!111 Don't ban me. :D

Haha started rewatching, like "yeah new interview!!11"... Only to realize I knew this already. =)

Your engine has a Wehwehchen haha! Sorry couldn't help myself. Glorious name!

Eleganteste lösung wäre ja wirklich entweder ramp nr im Briefing oder bei start up clearance. (Request start up @ XY). Dann hätte man mal wieder einen Grund DCS-ATC freqs überhaupt einzugeben. =)

Heya, when I flew in the last months, it was mostly freeflight stuff. With the release of the Harrier I spent a lot time again on the server and had great fun. Awesome to see the 104th always active and to have a very familiar server even after years to just hop in and basically feel at home. One thing that is a recurring theme in objective based A2G servers is the endless search for 'the last tank hiding in a tree/river/destroyed unit or just plain sight'. This has been a great show stopper time and time again even with a lot of experienced players working as a team. I consider this just one of the issues with DCS in general. But flying on some other servers, which pamper you with laser spotting CTLD JTAC units, I find myself question my time used everytime we circle for 30m over the same spot without seeing one tracer round. I have do admit when not flying the A-10C it is hard to go back without those sweet Harrier assisting humvees and drones! :) But I realize for the 104th mission style, a JTAC unit that marks from mission start to end would be bad for game&teamplay. But maybe if there is only a certain amount of units left or if enough time has passed for a TA, a JTAC unit may activate. From previous discussions I know for stabillity sake the 104th servers try to not use many scripts/triggers etc. that have the potential to cause trouble. With this in mind maybe there could be the alternative to incorporate some transport choppers closer to the TA's giving incentives to go build a JTAC units by players. The problem I see with that idea is that once that is done, there is nothing for the pilot to do and it's a long way anywhere. :) Just some thoughts, I demand and expect nothing, server works for years without my ideas. =)

I want road bases! :)

YES!!! All in! GA <3

Ah sorry forgot that question. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3304547&postcount=61 In that thread the newest patch notes are published, sometimes new patches will get released first on the open beta branch because a lot of bugs and issues are expected. Also the chances that a users installation breaks is much smaller. As you can see from the notes the new patch has the harrier for example. :) On the top of the post I linked you can see "today for the Open Beta only".Depending on the quality of the beta patch it will take 1 or more weeks to be released on the release (normal 1.5) branch. Personally I have DCS 2.0 & 1.5 installed, when there is a beta patch I simply change my 1.5 version as described in my last post. (There should also be a few tutorials around this forum that explain it way better than me) But if you have the disk space there is no problem to have 3 installations next to each other.

You can do it two ways: Install a new version, (beta) next to your normal DCS install. (Will cost a lot of space, time etc. but secure against messing somethign up) Or you convert your current installation into a beta version. You can do this via Skatezillas GUI tool (see mod section) or an edit in the autoupdate.dat file in the DCS main folder. Make a backup of the file and simply change the second line from 'release' to 'openbeta' ( "branch": "openbeta",)

The issue is probably a a faulty default binding on the HOTAS function spacebar should be on. That should be either firegun or weapon release. I ran into the same problem when I bound silence Master caution button to spacebar. :)

Please share your JSGME/OvGME version in the mod section, very interested in this.

I hate and love those things. The sound is super annoying after a time but I find myself often just smashing lights. :D It's christmas where are the lights?! +1 ^^

You assume that people have any kind of mobile cellphone that supports this. Many people don't have them, I personally don't own any wireless capable devices nor would I be able to 'tether' myself a internet via mobile connection to activate. ------- Now I am actually little appalled that people from a point of authority follow a line of argument a long the lines "If you post this, you have internet and this doesn't really concern you" ... Doesn't really help! Even as a bystander that triggered me a bit, maybe you should consider that when trying to 'defuse' a discussion. :D The problem I think is that mostly everyone can identify with a situation where he had through whatever circumstances for a long time no internet connection, that may heat up the debate a bit. Generally new DRM: YAY! Thank god! Finally. This is great news. All the way in the right direction I believe, Starforce has had it's good run with DCS, if you look at the relevant piracy places you will notice DCS gloriously absent from them. But if the new DCS-DRM can deliver the same protection from piracy, I am pretty sure is not on a technical level depending on a time frame for reactivation but other factors. Giving people a generous offline period (2-4 weeks) should placate everyone concerned the same way 30d license refreshment for Starforce did. Please ED don't get discouraged by this (lively) discussion. The devil is in the detail. :)

Early Access. Suprised you expected them on day 1.

No they won't as indicated by all the FAQs. :)

Any public MP servers that have LotAtc running?

But what are you basing this on? First google hit: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3753357 3rd hit: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a177986.pdf So what do you mean by not enough strength for a dog fight? It's a weird argument. :) I am confused what physical requirements you see beyond the normal fittness a pilot needs to perform at high G's. I think there are quite enough RL cases, that we don't need to seriously argue this point?

I think the request is really simple and straight forward and backed up by facts. Some of the things brought up (even on this page) to argue against it, sound like you are trying to discuss something entirely else. And I think we can all agree that the stuff you guys are trying to make this about, will go into Rule 1.7 territory. :D

+1 This is a big MP cheat that can be used in all the more advanced (and bigger) campaigns that use vast areas of the map. Where hiding your presence until the time is right and using diversions are important to mission success.

Damn I have been looking at this Monitor and the same in 24" version. This sounds very bad for that kind of money. Anyone know if the 24" version has the same problems? I was very close to buying the otherday, so thank you for saving me from that Simicro.

Have you tried completely deleting the DCS folder in the saved games folder? It sounds like you carried over some kind of problem from the old install when you used your old control bindings, or atleast that is my best guess. On new installs I tend to simply dump the controls from the old install into the new in the user/saved games folder (even when going from 1.5 to 2.1, I know I shouldn't...) and it has caused problems for me before.