Baco

Yeap And it would help the Korean theater cause plenty also But like they said before.. Anything 50´s I am in!

THNAK YOU!!! Awesom!!!

What I meant to say is that from the "flow chart, algorithm" point of view is not hard, and then I added a couple of Hundred lines of code, so Yeah its not easy, but its not Rocket Science..... IA evidently checks variables.. if a variable tells it that Gs are x,then stop... But yeah I have been reading on FM Modding and I can see why the AI cant do certain things, its because the SFM does not measure drag, AOA etc... so Yeah they need a new FM that tells the AI that it is supposed to stall....o to have a G limit. right now, specially for subsonic planes, the FM is very limited.

I would love a British Phantom, interesting, new, last of the fixed wings carrier born British planes... top of the line 70´s plane.. and does not step on any toes... AND with the right weapons, it could pass as a vietnam era Phantom...

Yeah its more content than the whole DCS franchise has put out in 10 years LOL.... Is this a Millennials thing? wishful thinking mantra, I wanna give me now kind of thinking?.. Or an actual roadmap of anything tangible?

its not that hard, limit energy state, limit Gs to AI, let her do what she can with in those parameters.. if out of energy either panic (rookie) and stall crash, or look for alternative maneuver... yes couple of hundred more lines of code but its doable...

Oh I would give my left kidney for a Panther and its appropriate Carrier...

dude who cares about your MP killfest scenarios... Like said above, we need mor scenario based variants, not uber killing machines to face your foes on line... I want Realistic historical aircraft and parity of assets, not the latest most advanced.... Giveme a Blok 15/20 I would be in heaven AND I can simulate A) more real historical conflicts B) more varied Air forces and realistic scenarios.... Right now, its air quake heaven.. And I want DCS for being a realistic fight sim sand box... If Razbam does the 2000 F 15 I am not buying it at all, no use, no need no added content, capabilities nor diversity in scenarios... Actually I cant think of ANY us post 80´s aircraft that I would buy...

The no Vietnam map argument is ridiculous, DCS had NO map for its airframes for over 10 years... no US airframe EVER flew in the Caucasus.. No carrier ever entered the black sea. A Late Phantom is redundant, the 14, 16 or 18 can do it better whatever it is.. Now in the 60s and 70s there were no 14s 16s or 18s.. and the Phantom Shines.. We are getting Corsair IIs and Crusaders.. I say complete the Series give us the Naval version. No I don´t want look down shoot down on a phantom thats why I got the tomcat!!! I want early air combat with its problems and solutions: tactics. Don't give us another Server Prima Donna.. give us a real aircraft to learn to fly and fight in. Its the problem with DCS general public the want planes to go kill things undisputed in MP servers.. General Dynamics F-16 A or B would have been a first day buy for me... But nooo we have the uber Block 52, so you cant even simulate any other nato country around the world that has the A as the backbone of its air force... Its even out of date for Desert Storm scenarios...

Hi Patrick! Yes I will send you the model have. But its based on the Sao Paulo that was based in the Clemenceau (in DCS as MODS), it uses the exact same model of the Clemenceau. The actual ARA 25 de Mayo yes is a Colossus class but it was the HNLMS Karel Doorman, so when we bought it, it already had an angled deck and a steam catapult on the bow. The Aromanches has a strait deck and no catapult.

Is there anyway I can change the "liveries" on the Clemenceau? Could I send you the textures of my 25 de mayo based on an older Sao Paulo AKA Clemenceau model? he one we are using now has some artifacts near the superstructure ande the bow... Merci.

Merci bien Eric! Thanks a lot! and thank you for this beautiful full working mod!!!

HI, First of all, Thank you for a grate working Mod of both the Etandart IV and the SUE/SEM. But I have a little problem: weapons on the wings of the SUE and SEM are not correctly aligned. They mix into the wing. See attached picture...

This is the Cockpit of the A-4AR. It sports an APG 66 v.2 From Lockhead Martin, an a nice Pratt & Whitney J52-P-408A turbojet, 50.0 kN (11,200 lbf) thrust... I believe its the most potent A-4 to date, with the latest F-1 form Brasil. Complete specs if you are curiouse...https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_A-4AR_Fightinghawk

I still cant understand how nobody is doing the Phantom II....The B and C ones Can´t be that hard.. Well except for the Multicrew thing... But So many other sims have taken a shot at probably one of the top 5 most iconic planes ever... Dropping the Phantom is the reason I will not buy the Hind or whatever Belsimtech or Ed will put out... My next helo will be the Kiowa... And maybe very remotely of they come back to the cobra (witch was also delayed)... Other than that they can keep their toys... Not my cup of tea....

There are no spawn points for medium panes in any of Israels bases on the theater. So basically you cant make a C 130 ( a plane that can land or take off even from carriers if needs be), cant take off form any base in the theater..... The closes spawn point seem s to be Beirut... Are spawn points for small cargo airplanes like the C 130 going to be added in future patches? Thanks.

I truly Hope so!!!

Thanks again for this beauty!!! and thank you for the template!!! Korean TO is slowly growing!!! Thank You so much again!

Well the SDB Dauntles can double as a texan easily. Actually thats what my Squad used in Il-2 as a trainer...

I believe a dash 4 or dash 5 would be very welcome, It equiped the navies of Argentina and France for a long,, long time. it fits perfectly in korea, Geez I trully hope that it will come later on...

I was also Hoping for a dash 4 or 5. But since we only get one of each in DCS, this corsair will have to do....

well he did say see you en February so.. I guess around then. Likewise, I would also buy anything Deka dishes out. Its interesting, new, well done...

I really think the L 39 can fill in nicely and it would be redundant.

Any chance to get an AI navigator? maybe get directions via a wheel like "Jester" or ask him via F-10 menu and he gives you bearing, time to waypoint and fuel?

I just don´t see why the mention of any transport, seems to be a "peril" or threat, to DCS, when it compliments it perfectly. And Just like you say, each module takes a few years to make, but ultimately its a decision to be made by the 3rd Party involved. Some operate on pure profit incentive, others, well, other reasons, I am sure the Eagle has not been a financial success of any kind... But Cool! we can only state our opinion, since in the end its up to the guys who can bring modules into DCS. Lets how the future brings lots of diverse cool new toys Cheers