Baco

100% agree... Although I would not mind a Cougar or Fury.... ;)

And lets face it Anyone can do fbw computer driven sims... The hard part is getting the FM and the feel of an aircraft right, and that´s what ED does best ans its squandered in uber modern planes instead of iconic planes with character like 70s and 80s ones.... Just develop MAC and give the kids the 22´s 35s 47´s (PAK), etc with aesa and super cruise... For us hardcore guys leave us a DCS with the legends and century planes...

ok see this sounds reasonable... But, all those parameters have nothing to do with RWR signature or tracking for teh missile. unless EDs phoenix misile api is interlinked with the AIM 120 one... then it would make sense....

I truly hope so LOL

This will be very helpful indeed.

True, but then again ED is not making a coherent complete Sim, only a Sandbox where to place ultra realistic Modules. And general public prefer new and fancy over coherency, or even logic LOL mos people wanna be maverick shooting everything on the sky and ground BUT have an "assurance" that is "realistic" so its totally True... In that box we are stuck, and it doesn't matter if there's a credible opfor, or even a credible map for a coherent conflict with a peer opponent. ;) So going back on topic, the "new" module could be anything from the Spirit of Saint Louis to the Space Shuttle...

https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.c...files/3303088/ Install in X:"your user name"\Saved Games\DCS.openbeta\Liveries\A-4E-C :):pilotfly:

It would be very, very nice... Yes, but then again priorities and resource allocation are the enemy of Grate Treats like this...

A work of ART!!!! (does this mean you have released it)? Just kidding!, juts kidding, DAM 5 more days AAARGGG Not kidding about the "ART" part..... Truly marvellous ;)

Grate News Bignewy. I for one, really like the new visibility of "flying objects". Hope they can come to a compromise that keeps the hi visibility effect.

Yeah Fri, If you take it out of context It sounds like that, but I am Talking specifically about the Phoenix API you know the missiles that ONLY the Tomcat carries? and no ED module uses at ALL? So go figure: That´s what I mean by "out of the way"... And I apreciarte your condescending tone, since that is usually the answer I give when things "get broken": Use the Stable version... Yeah... BUT the THING is: I am not asking to explain why they brake things "in general", but WHAT did the Phoenix API had to do with ANYTHING they were working ON... Leaving a PRIME module BANNED from servers for over 2 weeks... OH and delaying a Prime Releas of the A version... Have a a peachy day :)

And then again the MB 339 was used in a LOT of air forces around the world. So My case and I am sure of lots of potential buyers is: I will buy whatever my air force did use realistically over Any other trainer Any day of the week and twice on Sundays, even if it less capable, or i happen to have the other two trainers... and trust me the Aermacchi was sold to a LOT of air forces around the world and it is still used...

Yes Please!!!!

The T16000 has one amazing feature: it is a Hall base stick, so its precision is unmatched except by Virpil/Warthog/Vkb... on the budget line. there is nothing that can compeate with the 16000 series. its only drawback is lack of HATs...And the whole package - Pedals, Throttle and stick is really excellent for the price... No doubt about it. Me personaly Now I use a mix and match jajaja. I started with T160000 series. Then replaced the throttle with an older X56 one (I wanted separate engine controle) , and I recently got a used Virpil T-50... But to answer the OP: not much really, on a budget line you have pretty much the X56 or the T-16000 series... the first has more buttons and hats, the second unparalleled precision.

lost the log - I only save the last one and Now after the Hotfix, cant reproduce! THANKS anyway!!!

Wow Yes I have been having problems with the but now I just use the native resolution... Thanks I´ll keep an eye on that a but I believe that the resolutions match now. Otherwise I can not have full screen or, like you mentioned, the mouse thinks it is "somewhere else"...

Would it be too rude or to much, to aks ED to please explain what they were doing modifying the Phoenix API. There is no ED module that deals with it... I mean what were they trying to "fix" or implement? Lately it seems that they go out of their way to just brake stuff ;) I know its NOT the case, an I know this things happen, But it really seems ODD... and not even mention it to their Partners.. its at lest Dumb... A nice line just saying how that happened would be really nice ;)

why would ED change anything on the Phoenix? they have no Module that uses it! its.. really bad form... and not telling in advance? I wish they would at least explain why and what they were trying to do...

sicne the Update the ME stops recognizing mouse inputs, cant save cant create a new group but map works ok showing grid coordinates zooms in and out.. I just cant interact with anything and I am forced to close the task from Windows task manager...

We have been asking this for AGES now.. How hard can it be to create an object that can spawn Aircraft on it... Make a HUGE disclaimer if you will: NO IA ARCRAFT if you must... are ALL Airplane SPAWN´s MAP dependant?

Still nothing more manageable?

Hi, anything remotely more manageable yet? The template is grate and I already did some skin, but my computer crawls when I open it, it take several long seconds like 10 or 15 for even changing a tool on PS...

Its beautifull!! AND we need more 70s and 80s ships!

It was in the Vietnam Server And also me hosting... Maybe the problem is only present on WAN connections? its clearly something to do with position data transmission to clients... since you can see everything the plane does, AK: gear up or down, flaps, hook, etc but its stays in the spawned placed...

Beautifull!!! TANKS!!! Any chance of making Client Aircraft Spawn form FARPs too? (witout having to tweek the LUAS)...