gavagai

Eh, so what's this? The map is going to be sold separately from the AI units? Where is the official link for this? I read the weekly news but haven't seen any mention of it.

So far I haven't seen intel prices drop 1 penny.

You're not arguing against the OP by comparing ED to a used car salesman, are you?;)

The product page on ED's website says it is a Korean War jet that fought the Mig-15.

Here is what I did: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=184080 If it ain't broke...

When the 4 core Ryzens are released we'll probably be able to build a decent PC for a very good price, certainly a PC good enough for DCS 2.5 and beyond.

The joystick would vibrate when you pulled the trigger; makes sense. As for patents, I heard that Microsoft was successful in the lawsuit that supposedly ended the msffb2. Is this true or not?

Woe to you if the F-15 pilots are also using good tactics and teamwork. ;)

I appreciate that these servers exist, but I do not find them compelling enough to log on more than once a month. On Burning Skies, especially, the mission seems to intentionally spread out the players with three separate target areas.

I would prefer to see an F-16 from ED before a third party dev. No chances with the Viper, please.

The first reason for introducing new and improved fighters in WW2 was to help mediocre pilots shoot down good pilots. With enough performance edge you can neutralize the skill gap. It's the pilot not the plane is something virtual pilots say when they're in the better plane. We have no evidence that the players flying the 109 are more skilled other than the fact that they shoot down more of their enemies, and their victories beg the question as to whether it is their skill or the aircraft's abilities that makes the difference. Without additional evidence/argument, it is a good premise that pilot skill is randomly distributed across the 4 WW2 fighters.

If not after one year, they might catch it after a second?:shifty:

I agree with that. Are those users the same as the early adopters though? I probably phrased my question poorly. For the sake of market share I would have expected the 6 and 4 core versions to be available sooner.

I see the 8-core is up for preorder on newegg. $330 for the 1700, and $400 for the 1700x. I still do not understand why AMD is pushing these 8 core CPUs so hard when the benefit for most users ends at 4 cores.

It will not allow me to edit the bug severity.:(

Make sure you use the flat terrain shadows and the 1070 will run 4k very well. I can fly through the Las Vegas Strip with 60fps, but in the Caucasus fps dips sometimes over large cities. Another thing, turn off anti-aliasing. You do not need it with 4k! And for the price they are too small, imo. I use a 40" Samsung TV in 3840x2160 for DCS and I couldn't go back to a smaller display.

And here is my report on the bug tracker site: https://leatherneck-sim.mantishub.io/view.php?id=572

If any of you can give Leatherneck better information that I could it might be helpful. The best I can observe about this bug is that sometimes it happens and sometimes it doesn't. https://leatherneck-sim.mantishub.io/view.php?id=574

Here is the post at the leatherneck bug tracking site. Current status is "assigned." https://leatherneck-sim.mantishub.io/view.php?id=400

I suspect it has the same problem as the Fw 190: absence of refraction through the armored canopy.

The stats are relevant. If it were a tighter race between the competitors we could talk about sample size, but it's not even close. One caveat is that the stats only reflect the overall quality of these fighters on the Burning Skies map. It is possible we'd get a different result with a different mission design.

Staying below your enemy has a couple downsides anyone should be aware of: It reduces the range of the s530. It exposes you to IR sams (rarely seen in multiplayer) It reduces the chance of successful egress if something goes unexpectedly wrong. There are times to be below your target with the s530, and there are times to stay higher.

The ffb is not strong enough to prevent you from moving your joystick, but of course in-game movement is limited at high speed. I enjoy the Spit with the msffb2. It is a good buy.

Still have it. The bug is more than a year old. I reported it again on the bug tracking site about a month ago when I didn't see any mention of it there.

You can do what you want, but keep in mind that none of us can give you accurate feedback until we test the sounds in-game. 5tuka made a lot of adjustments to his Bf 109K-4 after community testing, and his sounds integrate into DCS better than the other sound mods I have tried. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=153398&highlight=Bf+109K-4 Some past DCS sound packs have been great on youtube but a disappointment after download.