Jump to content

Skjold

Members
  • Posts

    503
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Skjold

  1. What about the Wgr 21? or Gunpods? Im not sure they ever were used on the K-4 just curious.
  2. Oh ok! Should have checked the .lua myself. Thats good to hear. I remember reading an old discussion about AP only and i assumed they would add an option to switch between ammo types in the editor if and when they added other types.
  3. Skjold

    DCS: F-5E!

    May it have something to do with Belsimtek being a Russian company? :thumbup:
  4. Since the release of the K-4 is approaching fast according to this, i can't help but wonder if the actual ammunition most commonly used on the K-4 will be in, i certainly hope so. From what i understand, the MK 108 in DCS currently fires 30 mm AP rounds and there is no option to change ammo loadout in the editor which kinda to some degree defeats the purpose of the gun.
  5. What is the maximun range of the HOT 3 missile? Which sub variant of the gazelle will be added first post launch? SNEB? 20 mm? etc. For Wags: Since you mention that the texture overhaul is a "DLC", does that mean that it is paid content?
  6. Yeah i know, was just messing with Cobra :)
  7. So May release date it is then. :thumbup:
  8. I love how this thread has become the kpist M/45 thread :)
  9. I think you are misunderstanding the situation. Just becouse the F-14 was announced first doesnt mean that it was ever slated to release first.
  10. Thanks for the update.
  11. An JA 37A and B should be sufficently declassified for them to do it accuratly but other then external looks you would be suprised just how different planes they really are, they share very little in common.
  12. Waiting for merge of 1.5 and 2.0 makes sense, any patching would have to be done on both builds adding alot of extra work. Thats also why i suspect other near finished modules in the DCS world hasn't popped up yet. C'mon DCS 2.5 (Who makes up these version numbers?) Go Viggen! :) (Not an AJS, but cool)
  13. New liveries are always nice but who knows, it is a decent amount of work. Thats a fairly good community made one, just a weird mix of low visibility and non low visibility markings.
  14. Looking forward to the update, hopefully at least something about the Viggen.
  15. Great work!
  16. Since i upgraded to Win 10 i got much, much lower FPS. Around 5-20. On the exact same hardware in Win 7 i got 30-60 FPS. I have made sure there is no hardware bottlenecks, this is what i've done. CPU is not getting maxed out, its a even 20 % or so spread out on all 4 cores. RAM is not getting maxed out, DCS is using circa 4-5 GB of my 16 GB of DDR 3 ram. SSD is not under heavy load, shouldnt affect FPS but worth mentioning. Uninstalled and reinstalled the video card drivers with no improvement. Deleted everything in the saved games / DCS folder to remove any old config problems. My GPU is not rendering any other screen or game, my frame rates are perfectly fine in numerous other games that are high performance. Anybody got any clue? I wanna fly :(
  17. This. The cost of a maimed soldier to the state is enormous.
  18. I would love all legacy stuff, but by far the most important one is the SA-2.
  19. Pretty much anything thats a russian combat aircraft 1960 to now.
  20. Today update is Beta client only? not stable?
  21. Yeah your processor is unfortanly too old.
  22. Thanks for the clarifications RagnarDa.
  23. Nothing wrong with Leatherneck communication, stop overreacting.
  24. AFAIK, no. That was the job of SF 37 (Spaning, Foto - Recon, Photo) Edit: And yeah, SH 37 which mattebubben pointed out (Spaning, Hav - Recon, Sea)
×
×
  • Create New...