Gladman

Really well done!!

So close!!

Wait a month or two and buy the new GTX. SLI isn't supported.

I disagree but that's fine. Carry on.

The RCAF flies a variant of the Hornet that is not the C modeled by DCS. That then begets the reality that Canadian skins are fictional even though to a small degree. Things such as the spotting lamp are not on the DCS model. Given ED stated they would work on non fictional skins first they obviously weren't a priority. None of that is negative. It is the truth. Time has gone by and there will now be RCAF skins but that doesn't make them anymore realistic. I'm not sure which part of this you misunderstand.

I was unaware of an argument. You have yet to display how I complained about the RCAF skins.

Are you done?

I better buy a used one right away. I forsee the cost of them rising quickly.

Loved that series. Great footage and a nice look into the reality of becoming a fighter pilot.

Yeah I got a good chuckle out of it.

I haven't complained about the RCAF skins. Where do you believe this has occurred? Moving beyond your rant I will simply state that I fully understand how skins work and the implementation of them. I am also fully aware of the reality that a good number of highly skilled individuals in this community will step forward to create exactly what I and others are looking for. If you would like to discuss the topic, do just that. Leave the drama out of it.

Reality is not nit picking.

All other aircraft are irrelevant to the Hornet. It is the mother, the bringer and the destroyer. All hail the Hornet.

It did actually allow for better visibility in close as well. It wasn't perfect but it was something.

Given the skins are "fictional" I would think it would be a low priority. To be honest, a very very small priority in my books. I'm just simply elated at the reality of the skins being made in the first place.

For reference I use a 10cm extension but I doubt the value would need adjustment.

Deadzone = 2 Saturation X = 98 Saturation Y = 98 Curvature = 30 I do this for both axis and it helps immensely. Now the reality is that the Harrier is a real bugger to tank vs a Hornet simply because of the probe location. You need to get the HUD indications aligned with the prop edge and the probe line coming in between the HUD and the box that says "Left, Ready, Right" on it. Tricky, but its a practice thing. Lots and lots of practice.

I have asked through the moderators for an update and NineLine replied that he would take it to ED given the amount of attention the topic is getting on the forum.

I would suggest the majority of posters are familiar enough with computer systems to understand that it is not a gameplay habit. We all get that for you life is good. Accept that for a good number of people something like scaling would be a significant boost to the overall experience.

You've been informed by several individuals using 4K that it is indeed a problem. Is it possible your specific setup allows you to see objects that others cannot with theirs? In reality every system is different and has its own advantages and disadvantages. It would seem by the length of this one thread (there are many more stating the same) that people are indeed having problems at higher res and in VR. To be productive, an acceptance of others technical issues is mandatory.

Absolutely awesome news!!!!! Sidenote: I beat Greekbull to the comments section. That's a first. :)

I'll be spending a month getting used to the systems I'm sure so although I'd prefer to have the Aim-7 at launch, the world certainly doesn't end.

In all fairness I highly doubt their customer service as any better than MFG. They are exceptional.

An SSD is what really improves load times for a decent computer. In your case I might suggest that upgrading is more a money pit than a solution. I'm sure its not what you want to hear but I would suggest starting a fund for a new system.

I had Saiteks, now have MFG Crosswinds. The difference isn't describable. You can't go wrong with MFG.