Boberro

What a piece of outstanding job :)

It is well known method but as you know it lacks of being turnable on and off :(

Remember Su-22 lovers will go to heaven, and haters to hell :>

Didn't he mean R family, not ER?

I am not for Tomcat love, personally think it is boring plane (well maybe I'll try Phoenixes :D once) but good to see some movement around double crew crafts. Regarding release date it is rather obvious it will take much more than predicted time, 1.5-2 years perhaps :)

Yeah yeah we will see how it is gonna be. So far there are thousands of new being said *amazing* devices. Most of them so far stay on paper or neverending prototype stage.

Do eyes really focus so close? There is LCD few cm in front of you, or there is some kind of trick that eyes think focus is far away, ie. normal way 0.5 meter and further?

Also as far I've read EDGE "building" (infreastructure) implementation does not make game so ultra uber heavy like it is now. It should be much better, even no need to decrease settings.

Video is not bad, finally city looks better, closer to real city. Airport also :) I hope in the final not everything will be shining, example concrete.

It is weird this thread still exist :O

So welcome F-14, MiG-24 or Su-17M4 :D

Use OCR app and translate it :)

I constantly see some called hyper uber VR revolutions and so far there is no any product widely distributed, instead good marketing movies only. Wake me up when it is as popular as laptops :]

DO you really believe you will gain even 50% FPS more?

Scary thing it will be Alpha in half year (or earlier). Not even beta. But Christmas 2015 will be fun though :)

Seems OK, it is still pre-alpha so it is reasonable to say far from beta and further from final release :D

You can do 5-6 firings easily - Fire from 10-11 km, hit, laser off, on, fire and repeat up to 2-3 km from last target :)

F-16 in DCS would bring BMS users too so it is not mouse trap. F-16 in DCS would be felt differently - cmon, BMS graphics SUCK BALLS as many other things in BMS which are important. Some 3rd party or ED should have enough big cojones to do the job.

For typical CAS mission without heavy bunkers, buildings, fortifications real weaponry would be 2x Vikhrs and some rocket pod - example S-8KOM. This way you gain high speed, lighter plane and good performance. Kh-29T is used for very heavy fortifications, buildings, ships. Using it against example Igla is nonsense in terms of realism. But in FC I use whatever I want, so I pack 2xKh-29T, 2xVikhrs, 2xKh-25ML, 2xS-8KOM(or S-25L), ECM pods. However mostly in real life you would pack few Vikhrs, rocket pod and MAYBE Kh-25ML in some situations. Even not always 16 Vikhrs, as in real life you can pack 3 Vikhr missiles istead of 8. Here you have 4x4 instead 8x8. Wish ED allowed this:

Well it would be wise from ED side to add (finally!) reason for an error. Now you don't know it is because of version mismatch, bad integrity check or just bad day.

It is well known issue, for me applies also. But never more than 15 seconds since I clicked slot.

Which TGP, gimme model number :P

No TV camera, no pod. It is just flying brick lol :)

MiG-25 is unusable, its only advantage is straight speed - nothing else. For me it is waste of time. But MiG-31, yes why not.

I hope that one of these 3 crafts is beloved Su-22M4 or even M5 :)