Amarok_73

First lasing detent will become handy, when the hover stabilisation mode will be implemented.

Try to decrease saturation by 2-3 on X and Y.

Eventualy

It was already discussed in "old" forum, and it was confirmed that he has. At first couple beginning years there was vocal warnings like "rakieta peredi nizhe", but someone decided, that the version implemented is not the one that was equiped with MWS in reality, so it was removed.

For fun Apache, but only if there's my live CP/G with me. For comfort and efficiency definitely Ka-50. The only thing I miss in Kamov is the MWS that was there some time ago, but is removed since a while.

I am flying with Logitech G940 (FFB), but I know from others using no-ffb ones, that as long as You're not using FFB, there's no difference really if You keep the trim or just tap it on no-ffb joystick. Even more, with currently implemented Flight Model I find more comfortable to not to keep trim while maneveuryng but tap it when I'll achieve stable flight. And that is totally oposite to what I am used to do in Ka-50, MI-8 or Mi-24. Apache is just too sensitive with default axis settings so it provides better "machine feeling" to me when I have resistance on stick while establishing the stable flight.

You just made me realize that I had waited over 25 years to be able to fly this machine again.

I don't know, I am flying on pilot's position. I'll ask my CP/G to test it though, as I am curious too.

@ArjenHVAThanks mate, still I was about to put it on my own serwer, and share from there as these materials shows and dissapears in the different services available in the Internet. Not mentioned to put any of PDFs here, in the forum. But I have doubts still...

I am sorry, but I can't find clear statement regarding publication of official Technical Manuals, so I can only point You to the publication and specific chapter within it.

Bind it to the Caps Lock, You'll have even indicator showing that the laser is burning...

For everybody interested in knowledge how does the stabilization works in real AH-64D i suggest to read the chapter 2.71 and following from the TM 1-1520-251-10 document (Technical Manual for AH-64D). It's pretty nice reading.

For me it helped to add some null zone on both, X and Y axles...

In regards to direction, FFAR is always shoot along the center line that is marked with dashed rhombus, but elevation is determined with your IHADSS elevation. Take a look at side 282 of the Quick Start Manual.

Actually, I can do with Kamov the things that for sure will not be possible in Winnetou...

Just jump into any multiplayer server, and immediately You'll get your feedback with very precise scoring More seriously, I am quite sure developers have more useful functionalities to work about, than bothering with something that can be substituted with mission generator, mission editor or mentioned before jump directly into action.

I've made couple attempts recording the video the same time, but the last one was showing clearest what is disturbing me, in this attempt however I did not recorded video, so here's the track only. What bothers me is that Sidearm, when activated, emits one tone (let's name it low), then when close to the radar source the reticle moves slightly higher, sound pitch goes higher but it still is not the rapid beeping that is related to the full lock on the radar, when the circle is relocated to the radar signal source. And even when the lock on radar is lost, and there' s no radar detected, the reticle stays in the higher location and higher pitch "mode". And that makes me wonder if this is meant to behave like that or it's the bug. server-20220303-204135.trk

The reticle was stuck to the HUD in it's vertical center line, slightly above the default center point where it appears when Sidearm is activated. @AlphaJuliet Let's postpone this discussion to the evening. I'll try it again, and if it will happen to me, I'll try to record video as well as get the track that perhaps will be of some use for You.

It's uncaged by default (solid circle), but trying to reset the reticle to it's default position/sound/behaviour i tried all I could, change mode (nav, gnd, landing), select other pylons/ordnance, cage-uncage reticle, toggle master arm, all without success. The reticle still was in upper position, slightly higher than default position, system emiting higher pitch sound after swithching back to the ground mode with Sidearm selected.

I was flying yesterday, and the aiming circle was behaving totally random. I'll test it today, record and share the video, as it may be, that I just don't understand the logic of this system...

Pardon me the necroposting, but I'd like to ask for approximation of the fix delivery for this issue...

Chuck's instructions are the best source of information I know about when you need to learn task-oriented. They detail all the activities to be performed, broken down into each of the possible tasks you might want to perform. You want to bombard with a specific type of bomb - you have this and such chapter for that. You want to learn the rules of air combat, you have a different chapter for that. And so on and so forth. With time, you will try to understand the principles of operation of avionics or other technical materials, then the manuals distributed with the module will be helpful, but they are not as convenient for task learning as the Chuck's documents are.

From my observation, Bx6 behaviour is also totally messed up. Does it goes into the same bug as the described above?

I preffer to have it bi-stable, but i have nothing against the choice available in mod's special parameters

Thank You @renhanxue. I know that in reality this switch is used in emergency scenarios, but having the throttle without any afterburner detents, use of it is the only way to keep the thrust stable on MIL settings. Thank You for cross-posting this issue into the feedback thread.