naizarak

how is strict realism an argument when, by ED's own admission, certain features are intentionally omitted or distorted anyways? if aircraft #5235-z block 47X tape 5.2 predates an armament's introduction but would otherwise be compatible with a minor avionics update, i don't think it would be crazy to make that stretch for the benefit of your players

i've noticed this as well, the missile will fly past you and then you'll explode a full second later my guess is that, given heatblur's record of overmodeling features with their own custom code, the phoenix's proximity fuze simulation runs in an auxiliary processing stack which is not tightly synchronized with the main simulation. afaik no other missile in the game has a modeled proximity fuze it's worth mentioning that if you notch the missile, it will go ballistic and fly to the last calculated intercept point. if you do not change speed or heading there's a chance it'll clip you without radar lock

every time there's a sale i'm tempted to get the f-5 but then i remember it only has 2 rear-aspect sidewinders and would be useless in most servers. shame.

including female models is a start but we can go further. i propose we add pilot models featuring the following sexual orientations into the game, possibly as an "Inclusiveness" DLC module: gay lesbian bisexual queer lgbtq asexual aromantic homosexual out closeted androsexual bicurious demiromantic demisexual gynesexual polyamorous skoliosexual anything less would be discriminatory in my opinion. it is the current year after all

how many were built? what is their service record?

not a fan of the proposed systems enhancement. this reminds of a little french developer named eugen who ruined their promising wargame franchise by falling down the slippery slope of including fantasy prototype vehicles. hope the devs remember this game is meant to be a simulator after all

his supposed experience is meaningless to us if he doesn't share anything and just keeps parroting "READ NATOPS". move on and stop indulging him

i haven't experienced this but i've noticed that the offset function doesn't apply to new RWR contacts and they all end up bunched together

i have it on good authority razbam will release the f-15e in the next update

only the mk83 is accurate in ccrp

they're most likely using it to train tactics and teamwork, not the aircraft itself.

a markpoint delete button would be nice

agreed, current system doesn't translate well to our toy joysticks would be nice to have a misc option such as "TDC depress to slew maverick"

the current slewing controls, even if realistic, are extremely cumbersome. hopefully ED will have the good sense to give us a "legacy" option that works like all the other modules and doesn't require TDC to be held down

you can try installing DCS world on your remote computer and manually downloading the modules: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=114030 then copy the module's folder from the Mods directory and inject them into your home installation. i've never tried it so can't guarantee it would work

zlib is a data compression utility, and most likely crashes because of a RAM fault. you should run a RAM stress utility like memtest86 to verify

people still buy intel?

radar won't lock targets in JHMCS boresight mode when looking forward through the HUD. is this accurate?

it's possible this is a DCS level bug and not exclusive to the viggen. afaik popped tires do not contribute to aircraft damage and do not qualify the aircraft for repair in all modules. in the su25t a damaged or stuck landing gear also doesn't count as aircraft damage. in general damage detection with landing gear/tires is buggy

HUD slew is too sensitive and twitchy. Radar slew is too slow and laggy. Maverick slew is janky. they need to review the slew sensitivities across the board and standardize them like the a10c

repair is still broken. landed with a bent wheel strut, ground crew could rearm & refuel but would not repair. acknowledged my request with "Copy" but repair timer never showed

is the bomb profile set to ccrp

the hornet hotas is trash compared to the a10c. personally i always keep radar on the right display and have mapped most of the buttons to imitate FC3 functionality. i also switch the bottom display to stores when doing a2g, and have mapped the entire top row as well

the last mission is artificially difficult, but there's a few things you can try: 1. rearm on the catapult, swap 2 of the mk84's for twin 82s or 83s. use the 2 remaining stations for more missiles 2. hang back and order your wingman to engage, then drag the migs through the 2 hornets doing SEAD or back to the tomcats 3. sprint at the airfield and bomb with ccrp. make sure to arm mk83's or cbu20's as they're the only bombs that work properly in ccrp right now

makes sense, facebook is probably interested in simple low-cost devices to outfit their social horde, with an emphasis on portability and smartphone compatibility. their vision of the VR experience is an immersive face-time videochat lounge, with any gaming applications as a bonus on the side really this was predictable when facebook acquired oculus to begin with