Buckeye

I find the exact opposite to be true. I would honestly never fly another second of DCS again if I had to fly on a monitor...I really do mean that. 2D flying is permanently ruined for me. To each their own [emoji1303] Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Did they provide any insight on why they intentionally did this? I ask because I can't think of a single logical reason for it...so curious what the dev team's thought process was/what I am missing. Thanks in advance :thumbup:

Incredible work, as always, Porco! Well done and thank you.

Makes the most sense for sure (I had requested this previously somewhere on these forums as well), +1 :thumbup:

Definitely wasn't intended to be rude, it was just an open question based on the way I had read your comment (I read it as it as "things aren't working out as planned"). Wasn't sure if there was then a change after the fact to remedy that. I obviously misinterpreted that, my mistake...my apologies for that, it was not intended to be rude in any way. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Pilot body This 100% Agreed, would be great to see this tacked on with the viewpoint update that is said fixed in the current internal build. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

improved air to air missiles Understood, hence why I didn't make any claims about it just being a tuning fix or about looking to achieve balance. Just asked for more color on "slow going with not much to update on". Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Bad hire or what? Or just a slow going process by design/as expected? This is a HUGE miss currently for DCS, so it's good to have it reiterated that this is a top priority. All the pretty graphics in the world can't mask the fact that A/A combat is grossly broken in DCS' current state. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Mig-29 would be the perfect module to give the Red side a full fidelity fighter for the Persian Gulf theatre versus the Hornet and Tomcat. I think having one is pretty crucial, and as much as I want to see the F-16 in DCS, I'd unselfishly chose a Mig-29 be developed first over it bc I think it's that critical of a piece for DCS and the MP community. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Maybe they will surprise us with an out of left field update on it at E3? That's when they first teased us with the Hornet grip a year ago, correct?

It's in the NATOPS manual, I'm sure they have it. If not a 10 second Google search on their end would lead them to it.

What was updated when the OB moved to release? I was under the impression the Release version = Open Beta? I might need to change branches for the update.

Bought the F-5E yesterday, didn't have a chance to fly it until this morning...just gave this mod a try. Worked perfectly for me in VR. Thanks, as always, Chris!

Do you have the IPD in game (i.e. World Scale) set properly? But yes, the A-10 is a pretty roomy cockpit.

NineLine responded to a comment of mine on Hoggit to let me know it was fixed internally already :thumbup: Hoping to see it pushed in the next DCS update.

Right on, thanks BB! Now it looks like I will need to figure out some ways to learn to do 3D design :thumbup: Appreciate the quick response.

PeterP's Neck Mod fixes the "checking my 6 and the seat is waaaay behind me" thing and has for many years. Works great, search out the thread (I'm on my phone so too lazy to find it for you, sorry). Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This is helpful. For the actual knob itself, did you 3D print this yourself or are there parts out there available for purchase?

+1 :thumbup:

It's based on how the real jet is, there is a yellow tint to the right and left sections...but some users report they see green instead of yellow. Might just be a bit of tweaking needed from ED to true the coloring up a bit, but the general concept is accurate to the real A-10.

See Heatblur's March update, it's explained in there. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

100% buying this day 1, and once the mission devs have time to design new missions, I fully expect the big servers to run missions here (on rotation). Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Given the US Navy direction things are heading in DCS (Hornet, Tomcat, Carrier Ops) it would make sense to expand for Fallon and other NAS'. Would also help to increase/improve the relevance of the map, especially to set up some USN DACT versus the F-16 that's coming in time. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

With you 100% there bro. Link to the article: https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2018/01/26/the-flare-path-jets-jungle-and-jack-yards/#more-511227 It's a good ways down in the article, search for Dynamic Campaign. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Did you miss Wags' comments re: dynamic campaign on the RPS article? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk