SDsc0rch

nah its fine - its actually a cool modification of that word - I think I'll use it! lol Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

"restructurate" nice :) Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

deathraptor... da real MVP!lol

it probably just asks each client their LAT and LONG - it takes that info, does its quick calculation and spits out a result your LAT/LONG position is no different if you're in single-player or multiplayer YOU are a sentient human being that uses reason and context to form an assessment of the world and environment you're in - a computer does just that, calculates and computes - it is deterministic and it doesn't do anything more or less than precisely what its told https://www.plough.com/en/topics/justice/reconciliation/science-and-the-soul

kindof big picture... i would like for two sides to be able to plan their own missions - instead of a single mission builder, there needs to be a minimum of TWO mission builders

UNDO !!!

typical fleet hornet pilots know all this?!? goddam that's a lot of detail.....

+1

hopefully the C *WILL* get the 9x and JHMCS !! what a strange thing to say why would you say that ??

that is the stated intention

the big bulbous canopy also has an effect on performance

THIS

^finished module

+1

i've wondered for a while now why ED emphasizes "STENNIS" why don't they just say "NIMITZ class carrier" and make the hull # like a "bort number" in the mission editor... able to be set in the mission editor

@ciribob pls check PMs thx

hear! hear! (( and... feel free to interpret that ANY WAY YOU LIKE, @checkgear - i don't care ))

as much as i love the american jets, taking a long view for DCS i think we oughta share the love and get diversity in the DCS stable

good observation woogey

just want to state this so "maybe" someone official at ED sees this..... i don't come to DCS for "FC3" i come to DCS for no-holds-barred, full throated, unadulterated, FULL FIDELITY, realistic flight simulation "FC4" is the WRONG. DIRECTION. my fear is.. you model an AWESOME jet in the FC4 world - and y'all clap your hands and say "great! check in the box! move on to the next one!" and we'll never see THAT aircraft as a FULL FIDELITY/Advanced Systems Modeling A10/F18-level sim i cannot tell you how pissed i'll be if i see an F-16 come out as an FC4 jet maybe i'm all alone out here and everyone is secretly pining away for the old days of simple flight sims and flying on rails and "this is the best we can do right now" but i think maybe not just want to put that out there.....

will FC3 aircraft be converted to fully clickable (ASM)?

can't argue with that

i certainly hope it is different! i hope ALL missiles get a re-work ----- they're all *very simple* right now

all grumman flight deck : )

<3