-
Posts
2021 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Schmidtfire
-
+1
-
So how will this MiG-29 fare against the more modern NATO jets? I think a lot of players are going about this the wrong way. Fighter vs Fighter, there is no contest and it is silly to think that a bolted on ECM pod or R-77 will change that. So what are the solution for having fun in a modern scenario? You keep the jet as realistic as you can and balance the mission instead. Give the older Redfor fighters tactical advantage. Better SAM coverage! Better GCI! more bases etc. There are ways to get interesting missions without trying to min-maxing every jet.
-
Is this a borderline troll-topic? I mean... if you cannot switch to Win10 without buying new hardware, how can you run DCS? It is one of the most demanding titles out there. If Win10 is so demanding that your current hardware cannot handle it, keeping at 2.5.6 sounds like the only real option.
-
It won’t happen for a number of reasons. The old R60 is made by third party Magnitude 3 and is not ED’s own missile. They have to take ownership of the missile and bring it into the rest of their inhouse made weapons. Another issue is that the FC3 jets are coded a bit differently, they have to code a different rear aspect only lock-on envelope into the jet just for the old R60. So it is a lot more work than you think for a missile that was phased out in the early 1980s.
-
Windows 7? They had to cut support sooner or later. If you MUST cling to this old OS you can still run DCS 2.5.6 or install Win10 on a secondary drive / dual boot and make it dedicated to DCS. I would not step away from DCS + 500$ worth of modules in favour for using an old and unsupported operating system. It makes no sense. Win10 is not perfect, but hardware and software is constantly moving forward with or without you.
-
Mi-24P project manager live stream
Schmidtfire replied to Kate Perederko's topic in DCS: Mi-24P Hind
For sling loading and transport operations? Yes. But for attack missions and CAS? I'd say it is quite hard against any type of vehicle that shoots back... and against infantry we are facing a different issue without any real spash damage, AI fear (running for cover etc.) The Hind will face the same type of issues and two BTR-80's will turn the helicopter into swiss cheese when making a strafing pass. The Mi-24P will still be a fine module, I have no doubt about that. But it won't shine in the attack role unless the missions are carefully tailored around it. -
Mi-24P project manager live stream
Schmidtfire replied to Kate Perederko's topic in DCS: Mi-24P Hind
That is why I expect that the S-24 rockets will be a popular option. Warhead is large enough to do some real damage. But the problem is still to engage without getting hit. DCS vehicle AI has very good reaction times and will fire everything from 7.62mm to guided missiles on the approaching helicopter. Sneaking around like the Ka-50 will not be so viable as the Mi-24P is larger, doesent hover as good and the short missile range will make those very dangerous to employ at a stand still. -
Video: F-5E (2x AIM-9P) vs. JF-17 (2x SD-10 and 2x PL-5EII)
Schmidtfire replied to Doc3908's topic in DCS: F-5E
One tip I can share. I make sure to flip up the FLARE JETTISON cover and have the jettison switch binded to my hotas. When the IR missile is coming your way, you close the throttle - manouver and dump every flare in one go. It is not the perfect solution, but against modern IR missiles you will only get one chance (if that). No need to conserve them, worry about flare count later. Flying with max flares and 0 chaff should get you a pretty good defence when you jettison in close. A cloud of heat. Tried and tested many times on the Just Dogfight multiplayer server, it really helps surviving the merge. -
Mi-24P project manager live stream
Schmidtfire replied to Kate Perederko's topic in DCS: Mi-24P Hind
It's going to be interesting finding out how well Mi-24P fits within the DCS environment. I have flown Ka-50 with only rockets and 30mm cannon boresighted... A very low threat environment might be survivable, but it will take a lot of skill and luck to employ correctly without getting shot down. -
Thank you Hiromachi Im sure a lot of work has been put into creating these options so It would be nice to finally be able to fully utilize them in both SP and Multiplayer.
-
I play a lot of multiplayer and the local Special Options settings does not have any effect when playing online. So, Magnitude 3, could you please integrate the following items fully into the MiG-21bis module? Realistic ASP IR A-A Missile Reticle Drives me nuts every time it does not work realistic but the box is checked. Why is this optional? Default is also set to off. SPECIAL FEATURES (the more realistic and useful RWR functionality) Whitout this we are stuck with the old RWR logic. Knowing what direction you are locked from is extremely important when trying to avoid a threat. The initial test were successful, so this should have been integrated by now. Also drives me completely nuts when it is not working but the box is checked in the Special Options tab. I know you have a lot on your plate and are not the fastest dev team (listened to your interview ) But please, look into integrating this stuff into the module. Or at the very least find a way so our Special Options settings work no matter if we play SP or MP.
-
I agree with Deka on this one. There is a very real reason why there is no BRM rockets on the inner pylons in real life. IF it is eventually modelled then it should be a a very risky loadout that can cause engine surge.
-
It’s very nice and fun to fly! Some minor issues with the accuracy of guns/radar sight, but nothing major. They have not included any nukes to use with the LABS system, so if you expect to go full ”Dr. Strangelove”, you have to make do with iron bombs.
-
The Radar display you mention is the VTB viewport. It is a function that exports the radar display to a physical monitor and not really a part of Mirage systems. So if you play DCS with a 2nd monitor you can put the exported radar info on that.
-
Unless there has been complaints, I don't think ED will waste money and resources on re-developing the 530D. I expect this to be a reality for upcoming "high-profile" weapons such as MICA, Meteor, IRIS-T, PL-15 etc.
-
+1 Same for the Viper. I would be very interested in an early F-16A.
-
Managed to find a demo of the APR-39 RWR. I heard that Polychop will create their own sounds for the Kiowa module, but this channel might be worth contacting for reference or recordings of the original sounds. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtI9G1ZOMWk&ab_channel=RCAFLibrary
-
Im quite sure the OLS over performs. It has been discussed before. Symbology should also be different. IRL the designator box for OLS is taller than the radar designator box. For me the biggest flaw is the HMS. It is presented far from reality (totally wrong in DCS) and it was such an important system of the MiG-29.
-
Combat Air Patrol 2 But it doesn’t matter. The Harrier module cost more than a full AAA game and should be compared to other DCS products, not on what is avalible outside the platform.
-
+1 ARBS/DMT updates would be very welcome.
-
It still has a fair amount of issues and missing functionality as far as the systems go. Seems to be a struggle just to get the HUD symbology right, it's been out for 3 years so that is quite telling I would think. The Harrier can be enjoyable for the casual DCS player. Razbam has added cool features such as Laser JDAM's and an improved targeting pod. But If you are more into learning how the actual systems work and get a full sim experience you might be dissapointed as it is not on the accuracy level as some of the other modules avalible. That is my take on the Harrier.
-
Fantastic news! Looking forward to this module. Here is a great read (46 pages) on the Mirage F-1 variants, foreign users, Systems and Armament. Loads of pictures too :) http://f6dsh.free.fr/de%20la%20part%...irage%20F1.pdf
-
[SOLVED] No CCIP Target Designation with Rockets
Schmidtfire replied to Schmidtfire's topic in Resolved Bugs
It produces a TD when bombing in CCIP. No CCIP TD with rockets. Sorry I don't have a track, but the functionality has never been added (AV-8B N/A owner since release) -
Issue is till present in latest update. I love to sling heaters, but that does not solve issues with finding enemy at longer ranges, in night/bad weather or IFF. Not saying it is an easy fix, but it has been 7 months with ED aware of the situation. If this would happen for months and months to the Viper, Hornet, Tomcat or Viggen there would be pitchforks flying all over.