amalahama

They can expend an eternity doing bugfixing... hopefully they will find the proper balance between developing new features and fixing what is already implemented By the way, with new features I also mean completing the half-cooked functionalities we have today (JDAM, PB HARM, etc)

As title says. What will be the next big feature to come in next OBs?

There might be a slight possibility of having a SU-30MKK as next module, it seems Deka granted access to some ac documentation as they stated somewhere in the Russian forum. Chinese version of course, idk the differences against the Russian version

Haha I love it!

Ok, it's time to burn that f5 key!!

https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4406262&postcount=29

Yeah radar modelling is arcadish at the moment but they have acknowledged it and stated they are working to bring it closer to reality

Being the Mig developed by RB, I highly doubt it

Apparently Zeus stated in Discord that this bug has been squashed and will be part of mid july update

Hey LastRifleRound, Laser ranging doesn't work at the moment, maybe that's why your aiming point is off even using PTRK

I hope we start knowing about A-10C v2 sooner than that!:lol:

They don't visit this forum any more, they prefer other forums where they get full control and ban to whoever complains about their add-ons.

This project has been very silent for too long. When can we expect more details coming? There is more clarity on BS3 potential upgrades.

It's the worst manual currently in DCS, it badly needs a rework

It's a static graphic object based on cartridge data, it shouldn't update. Moreover we should have full control during mission planning to decide what's drawn in the SA page, unfortunately carteidge management is something yet to come

INS modeling is not complete, INS fix modes beyond overfly don't work and FP-B doesn't work either. I think there are some elements in navigation subsystem that needs some additional work

I can live w/o number 3 (and probably doable to some extent with advance lua scripting in ME)

We are not talking about rocket science here, it's just to remove the black box when there is no advisories.

But is the adv- realistic? And if not, what is ED waiting for to fix this annoying bug?

IMO it's not that important the absolute number itself, but the relation between them. I think ED should be the one deciding the RCS for each aircraft, so all them are consistent with each other

Is it possible to copy PP1-PP5 among stations?

Up. I don't understand either the difference (operationally speaking) between ground stabilized (tdc press) and atrk (sss left/right), both seem to have similar effects for tgt designation, with atrk being unable to slew afterwards

Well not the datalink itself, but the information flow is. Again, the datalink assumes that all nodes have some sort of "god eye" and can see all AG targets around, SAMs, ships whatever, regardless they are emitting or not. Just put an JF-17 close to shut down SAM sites and boom, their locations are instantaneously given away through the DL. Realistic behavior would be that each node transmit the target they are attacking, that is, the 'SPI', because it's the only AG contact that is accurately geo-referenced by the attack system at a given time Oh you are really, really wrong. I recommend you to read the STANAG 5516 to begin with if you want to get closer to the knowledge that my daily work requires :)

Man, I launched Janes JF-18 to revive some old memories, and to my surprise, you can take out ship defenses with Harms, so Harpoon can get through their defence rings. Not even that is modeled today in DCS

Yeah, add also electric system simulation as well, BS and A-10C lack it, it's just on/off stuff. From mi8 onwards they started to develop it in greater detail