CrimsonGhost

Thanks for this. I was actually looking for the correct file structure for liveries but I imagine this is the same way.

I was trying to think of something snarky to say about this necro thread but it’s far too early for that.

Here you go. This should let you download it for yourself. Its certainly nice to have around when you own every module. :) https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B44Egs5qiC_bRVhvajk5R3FLZlU/view?usp=sharing

Thank you very much for making this available so quickly. Really helpful for those of us with little to no skills in the ME. :)

FWIW this issue is a very old issue that ED has yet to address. I have been dealing with it for a couple of years now. ED used to have an "imposters" option that would help with scaling but that was removed with 1.5 IIRC. Now that 4K displays are becoming more common I hope we can get some resolution to the problem. It is a really tough to decide between a beautiful sim and one that you can actually spot targets.

I have not looked recently but the latest method I know of is to contact ED support and have them assign the module to your friends account. Hope it helps.

Agreed. Every once in a while I fire up this bird, taxi out, and take off. Then remember that it flies on rails and put it back in hangar. Ready for a good update.

Hello all. As many of you know playing DCS in 4K is absolutely stunning, but the model spotting issues are becoming tiring. So I have been looking at picking up a 1080P monitor to see just how different it is. So here is my question. Do any of the gaming monitor specific technologies such as GSync, High Refresh Rate, etc have any benefit or bearing on DCS gameplay? I don’t mind investing in tech if the rewards are worth it. So is there a consensus on what is best for DCS? I thought about going to my local Best Buy and picking up a cheap monitor but wanted to defer to the expertise and experience found here. Thanks folks!

Hello all. What I am about to purpose could already be there but I have been unable to find the information I am looking for. My purposal is to add a version number, or the latest edition updated date, to the first page of the file. Personally I save files like this to multiple locations and it would be nice to be able to quickly identify which is the most current version. I hope this request make sense. Thanks Razbam for your great product and the continued efforts. :pilotfly:

I would love for ED to address the cockpit visibility issues in 2.X. Currently things like the buttons on the CDU are impossible to read in direct sunlight. And it’s been like this for a very long time now.

I quite miss the texture mods. As I fly in 4K, and scaling has never been properly addressed, it was nice to at least have a much better visual experience. It really should be up to the server owner to decide what they want to allow on their server.

Quick reminder, the OC Teamspeak Server will be coming down later today. I hope everyone has found a new home. Thanks guys.

You know you have my support for anything you want to create. And I’m always available to help create/test new missions. You know how to reach me. :)

I would be interested in a full fidelity AT-6 Texan II. This is the primary trainer for most western pilots before they move up to jets. Not to mention it is a very capable light attack aircraft for its size.

Not quite sure what part I fouled up but I am still having issues. Tacview now records, but it s only the start and end of a flight with no unit data gathered. Any suggestions?

I was also noticing how precise his control over the aircraft was. Nothing like what I experience with the Harrier we have. I write it off for now considering his real aircraft and flight time as well as the fact that ours is still very early on and changes can be made.

If I had to take a guess, I would say it is some form of periscope style optic. Perhaps for the TOW missile aiming system on the BO-105? Purely a guess so don't read too much into it.

This is spot on. Turbine lag is a very real thing on these older engines. Harriet in particular. If you look on the ENG page there is a section of approximate time to ramp up to a certain engine RPM percentage. Personally I have been watching the RPM gauge like a hawk when in any other nozzle position than 0 degrees.

Awesome! Thanks you sir. I will have to give it a go in the morning. I am very excited to get this aircraft up and going in the NTTR. Will be a blast.

I will echo the sentiments of everyone here and also say thank you. Your efforts brought countless hours of enjoyment to many of us out here. Lastly, again as others have said, go have fun. Get back in the Flanker and do what you like. After all, that's what everyone is here for. Side Note- With the closing of OC, I will be taking the TS server offline. I will leave it up and running until 12/15/17 so that those that currently use it can find new homes. I hope my little contribution to OC has helped.

Hello all. I’m gonna go ahead and be that guy. :cry: Would anyone have a recently updated SP shooting range/training zone mission that they may be willing to share? The last one I have is Vipers 1.5 Range that I have butchered into an unrecognizable mess with my poor mission editor skills. :doh: I know it’s awrully early but inclusion of the Tarawa and KC-130 would just be amazing. This would give me a couple more ways to wreck even more Harriers. :D I also know this is a big request. I can’t be the only one that could really use the assistance of some of you more talented mission designers. Thanks

English is the international language of aviation. Not trying to hurt anyone’s feelings here but this has been the case for a very long time.

Very happy to see that I’m not totally alone in my thinking. I can’t imagine trying to learn the Harrier and defending all the time. But that’s just me. As has said before, this server is his baby and I will completely respect any decision he makes.

Hey Mirknir. Sorry to hear you are becoming burnt out, but I completely understand. As you know I used to really enjoy your server. However with the recent change in direction you mentioned I just can’t bring myself to log in. I miss the good old days where you could actually do something other than air quake, or get shot down by the air quakers. I had a thought/idea a while back that while it would be wholly unpopular, could be interesting. That idea was to completely remove, or disable, all of the slots for the aircraft that are usually used in air quake scenarios. I can hear the screams and rage generated by those reading this and while I am sympathetic, there are other servers more suited to this. OC used to be a great place to come in and learn a new module and have a great time. Anyhow, I know I will not make any friends with my suggestion, but it’s just an idea. Maybe one day I will get around to figure out how to run my own server. I have the hardware and bandwidth, but not the knowledge to make it happen. Again, not looking to step on anyone’s toes or hurt anyone’s feelings. Just spitballing an idea. Thank you Mirknir for all the work you have done for the community. I know I will support whatever direction you choose to go with OC.