probad

you should post some replay tracks i am frankly quite stumped at your descriptions of the 109's lack of performance not that i don't recommend plunging straight into mp, but i think you're overemphasizing the deficiencies of the ai flight model. they're not so significant such that the fundamentals of bfm no longer apply.

though that last image posted is a rendering of strike eagles -- canopy shape is very distinctive.

all i can say from practical experience is when you're redlining the 109 in a dive you will be glad for all that "unused" positive trim capacity

aye, ai cheat a bit but are very much outflyable, so you must not be exploiting your aircraft's potential properly or you spent too many years reinforcing bad habits that lesser flight models let you get away with time is not a qualitative guarantor of anything

zuni is only in 5 inch, no other "versions" iirc the only 2.75 rocket other than hydra was the old mightymouse

unlike canards on the rafale or typhoon the canards on the su-33 are not actuated but are designed to maintain constant orientation into the airflow. they're not for directly effecting attitude changes but rather to aid stability at high aoas

player viggen radar shows up on rwr just the same please stop insisting otherwise

yes i only replied after having verified in game with both viggen and f-15 rwrs

rwrs will pick up viggen radar, as it is an x band set just like all other aircraft radars.

what? you'll get emission indications but you only get warnings if the radar emitter switches to guidance waveform aka you have a missile inbound if you haven't played any multiplayer yet you should just go online and do some flying, it will answer these basic questions

you want to attract an audience that cares more about trading cards than learning about aircraft nope

you mean for roleplaying purposes

this needs to be standard for all modules complete with shakey hand

Lockheed Martin = LANTIRN -> SNIPER Raytheon = ATFLIR Rafael/NorthropGrumman = LITENING what does "worse" here mean?

to think this thread will only be a small taste of the turdtornado that will be once the module actually comes out

im not so sure it looks that dramatic in person, due to the way cameras work these types of stuff tend to look different than through meatvision pilot probably just sees more mundane spark "flecks"

can't upvote so qft

if you can find me a comparable hornet experience for less im all ears

if that is true, it is news to me i hope this is not the post you are referring to?

not really interested, because reality is stranger than fiction

thanks for the correction i still had the image in my mind of 2-3-2 tomcats where the palettes blocked the foreward tandem slot.

where do you put the 6th aim-7? because theres only room in the back of the pancake for 1

5 aim-7 + 2 aim-9

yes, that's fine. substituting it to mock a 19s in a vietnam-esque scenario is fine. but putting forth an argument trying to leverage vietnam as justification is not valid because its not factually true.

1. no 2. please do more learning about what the super bug is beyond looking at pictures of it. its a whole different airplane from the legacy bug.