imacken

Even if there was native support in DCS, you would still need Experience running. It’s only GameHub that wouldn’t be needed. There isn’t an issue with W11 and Tobii. You should contact support. They are very helpful.

If only Tobii and ED would put their heads together and make Tobii integrated support in DCS, we’d all be happy!

Agreed. Razbam have excellent products, but the whole presented package needs to be improved. It's the same with the F-15 and South Atlantic map. Excellent high quality products, that after a year have - more or less - no pre-packaged missions in DCS. Now, I know some people will jump in and say 'produce your own', but my point still stands.

Yes, it’s been 2 years since @baltic_dragonposted above. The same thing happened with his Harrier TMs. Just left to stagnate with no updates for years. I love his work, but I feel he takes on too many projects.

Honestly guys, we've lost the plot here. It doesn't matter who makes the missions, there should be a significant number after a year supplied with the base DCS install like every other terrain and module. Simple as that. I'm off this thread now as we are way OT. I'll look again at this map in a few months to see if things have improved.

Sorry, what is your point here? The fact is that all terrains had missions for several modules from day one except this one. I suspect that the terrain devs supply the initial missions to the aircraft devs for inclusion. Regardless, whoever produces the missions for the various modules/terrains has largely bypassed this map which is a shame.

We're being pedantic here. Of course the missions are listed with the modules. Be difficult to have a mssion with nothing to fly it in! The point still stands.

Completely agree. As I menioned before, this is the only terrain that has this issue. All others had loads of mission from day one. Similar situation with F-15. I am also suprised that ED allow this to happen. I'm also surprised that given Baltic Dragon's relationship with RAZBAM, that he has not produced a few mssions for the terrain and module to include in the base DCS.

Honestly, I don't know why you are so defensive of this map. Just leave it. The fact is that every map and module has loads of content from the get-go except for this map (and the F-15E). Users shouldn't have to learn how to use ME to enjoy their purchase. RAZBAM had promised mission content a long time ago. It's just not appearing and after 1 year, that's disaapointing. Until stuff arrives, I'll use all the other maps. I'll keeep looking out though. I'm glad you're happy with the situation, but others aren't so much. It also makes me laugh the over use of the work 'ranting'. Definition is 'lengthy, angry and impassioned speech'. Are you really seeing that? Just making a sensible comment really and expressing disappointment. Ranting? No. I've got more important things to waste energy on!

Well, it's been a year now, and still no change. Pity, it looks like a beautiful map.

Working ok now. Maybe it was uploading earlier. Thanks a lot for this.

Hmm, the Download link on the page doesn't work!

This is very sad and upsetting news. I had many really nice exchanges of messages with Don both here and over on the Virpil forums over the years. He will be badly missed. RIP Don.

Yep, still the same for the P-51. Here is how to replicate: 1) check that there are 'P-51' and 'P-51-30-NA' folders in SG Input. 2) run DCS 3) load Instant Action P-51 'P-51D D-25 Ferry Scramble' and make a bind change. (Make sure it's the D-25 mission.) 4) QUIT TO DESKTOP. (Don't just quit back to main DCS menu.) 5) run DCS 6) load Instant Action P-51 'P-51D D-30 Ferry Scramble'. Bind change made above has disappeared! (Make sure it's the D-30 mission)

Thanks a lot for the update!

Yep, I was thinking the same thing but didn’t want to ask!

Personally, I’ve always used Minsky’s excellent airfield data pack which has all airfields in DCS including Syria. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3312200/ I’ll have a look at the one you recommended though.

Yes, @Qsenox is correct, but I'd love to know why changing this will affect your axes setup. It shouldn't affect 'real' axes at all. It could affect axis to button configs because of the extra new logical buttons which might put your additional axis to buttons out of sequence, but not the real ones.

Are you talking about ‘real’ axes, or virtual axes? I don’t see any reason why it should make any difference to real axes.

Great work, as always! Out of interest, why don't you combine the 3 downloads into one?

Great to see you back! Thanks a lot.

I wish it did help me, but it doesn’t. Glad you’ve got it working though!

But, it won’t be long before the ST version is removed.

Just a small point, the 'Latest Version Available' is not showing the latest Utility Build.

Is there any chance that, in the future, the app window will be scalable? Or, give users a choice of font size?