Lieuie

Thank you. Your work is greatly appreciated.

https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/downloads/screenshots/ For now you can see them here.

I am assuming you mean mudspike.com

It must mean that a B-2 module is coming.:)

It doesn't.

Just to clarify, the DFCS was not a fly by wire system but a more advanced stability augmentation system.

I'm pretty sure that navy aircraft can land on runways as well.:)

I think it's also important to mention that the ROE didn't really favour the employment of the Phoenix. If you have to wait for your adversary to fire to fire at you first you will probably be close enough so that you could use a sparrow. Firing an AIM-54, whose real benefits are the launch and leave capability and long range, seems a like a waste when a sparrow would suffice.

I just lean my head or try to guess.

Just what we wanted to hear. Thanks Cobra.

These screenshots are from 2016 if I'm not mistaken so they are probably not representative of what we will actually get. Also bear in mind that the Kuznetsov will only have static crew, at least for now.

I didn't see any info on when we should expect it but maybe it's better that way.

I assume it's going to be in there.

I don't have much of an issue with the afterburners. The AIM-9 launch sound however I think is a bit exaggerated.

That would be one of the reasons. Also I would assume that the turbocharger would have a rather large moment of inertia due to its size and weight (compared to an automotive application). However that's not as much of a problem in airplanes as it is in cars since you don't move the throttle as much as you do in a car (same thing with locomotives). A great illustration of that is that jet powered cars never gained much traction.

It is wake turbulence. I turned it off and didn't have any issues.

Aircraft gets destroyed on the ground as I am doing the startup around the time the second F-16 takes off. There's also there's weird buffeting as well. I turned wake turbulence off and it went away. It seems it has already been reported. Unfortunately I didn't see it in time.

Go to the binding. At the bottom you will find an axis tune button. Press that and you will see among other things the option to invert it.

Yes

It would be nice to see some of the features of the ED carriers be implemented to the Forestall class carriers at least for those who are going to buy the ED carriers.

Well... The A and B were sold as a single module but I certainly get your point. There's still plenty of work left to do with the F-14.

Also ILS landing.

Leatherneck will probably create one. What I am really interested is if development from the Nimitz is going to provide any help to WWII carriers. Things like comms (although I assume they were different compared to modern ones), carrier personnel, animations etc. Also if it does will they allow Leatherneck to use them.

While it would be great to see I don't expect ED to create one any time soon since they are still working on European Theater units. They are also working on the Nimitz class carrier module and the Arleigh Burke and an update to the Kuznetsov so I guess they are quite busy for a while. Plus at the moment there are no aircraft that we can fly that operate from a carrier. We will probably have to wait for the Corsair to be released first to see any development on the Pacific Theater let alone a carrier.

Did I hear Japan?