llOPPOTATOll

The amraam is also missing an entire guidance mode

In the other sim, the Lantirn, Lightning, and Sniper are all the same

Ive messed with it quite a bit and i dont think its working currently.

Please make your own thread, this has little to do with the original post.

It goes off of SPI, did you initiate a point track or area track with the tgp?

All of that stuff shouldnt even be displayed if the JDAM doesnt have JPF. So if were getting JPF in the future thats cool, but we dont have it right now so the SMS page shouldnt show it.

The wording on the SMS Base page is also too spaced out.

It appears that ED modeled the JDAM SMS pages as if it had a JPF fuze, but we do not have JPF in DCS. In addition to this, the SMS Base and Control page isnt blanking things that it should and the Arming Delay is incorrect. On the SMS base page the Function delay should be blanked because we dont have JPF equipped JDAMs, the impact azimuth should be blanked if 0 is entered. On the SMS Control page, the Function delay and the AIR/GND/GND DLY should be blanked aswel. The arming delay should not be a rotary without JPF equipped JDAMS, instead it should be a data entry MFD page that you can enter a value between 0-99.99 seconds. This is because without JPF installed the arming delay isnt actually sent to the bomb but is only used for HUD LOW cues. I would have attached photos of diagrams but it is against the forum rules.

Can you elaborate on the 10digit MGRS? All i can find is 8 digits, 4 on each axis up to 10m of accuracy.

Any value between 0 and 360 degrees may be entered; however, an entry of 0 will be considered invalid to the weapon and will cause the weapon to fly from the release point direct to the target.

Yeah, its all off of SPI, you can create four steer point on the target and cycle through them and drop on each, but you cannot just assign coordinates to the bomb like the PP mode in the hornet. Only some export blocks like IAF vipers have the capability to assign coordinates to each bomb.

Yes thats correct, you can not do that.

You dont have documentation to backup your claim. Im not asking for you to share the document, im asking for the name of the document. I could say look on page 327 and it says that the F-16 doesnt have mids voice and you wouldnt be able to even look at my source without knowing the name. So unless you say the name of the document, said proof is irrelevant. And you saying it doesnt have KY-58 is just straight up wrong.

Saying "on page 212" litterly doesn't mean anything without knowing what manual your even referencing. The F-16 does not have MIDS Voice. The F-16 does have KY-58.

Which manual?

In the tape were getting we have 127 steer points, not 99.

If you can find me a source saying that the USAF F-16Cs have MIDS voice that would be spectacular, but until then its irrelevant if its open architecture or not.

If you take a look at this website it also says that its Block 1 "MIDS-LVT(1) — fielded on F-16, F/18-E/F, U-2, MH-60, UCAV, C-130, F/A-50, P-3, B-2, shipboard." MIDS-LVT(6) does NOT have voice capability according to this.

Exactly what I thought.

The question isnt does it have MIDS, which it obviously does. My question was asking for your source saying it had MIDS VOICE.

Do you have a source, i’m 95% sure it doesn’t do that.

Bullseye can be any stpt 1-25

We barely have a working C-5 and its been in development for like 10 years.

IRL its in the DTC, they arent spending like 20 minutes playing UFC simulator.

It isnt implemented. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk