kotor633

Or you set the settings as you made them in 'Standard Operating Procedures', in the screenshot on page 36 ...

Except the JF-17, right? You don't notice a big difference in the game whether you drop MK-8x, GBUs, JDAMS or Durandal onto the runway. The effect is the same. At least that's how it was when I had experimented with the JF a long time ago.

Ich nutzte seit ich in DCS und Falcon BMS unterwegs bin NUR TrackIR. Und bin mehr als zufrieden damit. Es tut was es soll, mit kleinen Kopfbewegungen habe ich alles im Blick. Und ist auch günstiger wie VR. Natürlich wird es auch einige geben die sagen VR ist das einzig wahre, Grafik ist geiler,... muss dann jeder für sich selbst klären.

Kann es mir nicht verkneifen: Wer lesen kann...

Oh, what helped me personally was the following youtube video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40_ayCrK--A Listening to the creator of the video is sometimes a question of patience, I sometimes got fed up with his comments. But as I said, it helped me personally. For example, I'm currently playing The Enemy Within 3 Campaign with an average frame rate of 90.

Hm, so I have less compared to your hardware equipment (Ryzen 1600, 32GB RAM, GTX 2070), but by far not as massive FPS losses as you have. I have added my DCS settings here. What else can be is that you have to fine-tune your NVIDIA settings (https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=dcs+world+nvidia+settings). It felt like I spent an eternity until I found the settings that were right for me.

Correctly. This module is no longer displayed in DCS, you can no longer play with it. The module, map and campaign are only deleted by clicking on the trash can symbol. And then you have to pull it out of the network again.

Maybe that helps a little. I tested the MOD this morning, but only briefly. And only by day not by night. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3314843/

I just tried it on me. It does not work. Thorsfury is right. Since the campaign is encrypted, it cannot be changed this way.

With a little work you can change it yourself on the A-10CII: Make a backup of the original * .miz file that is to be changed. Then open the * .miz file with a ZIP program (7zip, winrar or similar). Then you got the file 'mission' on your hard drive. You open it (preferably) with Notepad ++. Then look for example in the opened file for ["skill"] = "Player". Then change the entry ["type"] = "A-10C" to ["type"] = "A-10C_2". Then you save the change. Now insert the modified mission file back into the * .miz file (just overwrite the old mission file). But whether the RED FLAG campaign will work the same with the new A-10C II as with the old A-10C, of course I cannot judge that.

Wow ... that's all you can think of about the video.

I'm happy to help if I can Oh, if you are new to DCS and may not be familiar with: ALWAYS a good first point of contact https://forums.eagle.ru/topic/113608-chucks-dcs-tutorial-library/ The F-16 is so far the first module where you have to carry out these steps for AGM-65.

I'm not so sure about that either. At least with the BIT tests, I think I know, you may or may not be able to do it. The damage model is not so far advanced that random errors can be triggered during cold start, which are then detected by the BIT test ... but without guarantee. Anyway, for the sake of reality we do that and this weekend I will enjoy the F-16C and its RED FLAG campaign.

Okay, and did you perform the boresight before (see page 328)?

Okay as far as everything is understood. Just what exactly do you mean by that: Pitot heat is way in the back on the left side. That you should always turn on the pitot? All of this is in Chuck's Guide or in the handout for the F-16C ...

Okay, and have you consulted Chuck's Guide pages 329 - 331 too?

Jo, with this campaign I have at least / finally a good reason to deal with the F-16C module. I have already deactivated all my other modules in DCS, I only want to deal with the F-16C and RED FLAG over the coming weekend and beyond. And what I also want to get rid of: The RED FLAG documentaries are awesome, very good work! This is how I imagine a proper documentary.

See it from the perspective: When you play a campaign you are more or less forced to deal with the respective module (in this case FA-18 & Suppercarrier). Means reading the manual, consulting Chucks's guide, watching tutorials on youtube. Of course, you have to invest time and want to do so, the advantage is that you then know your way around the module and can also use what the module offers. So far I have had 3 campaigns for the FA-18: Serpents Head 2, Raven ONE and Aggressors BFM. This is where I personally find Serpents Head to be the 'easiest'. The fact that you can change anything in the campaigns has been largely forbidden by the campaign creator. And there are very good reasons!

https://www.chip.de/artikel/RAMDisk-fuer-Windows-10-Mal-schneller-als-jede-SSD_140109221.html https://www.pcgamer.com/what-is-a-ram-disk-and-should-i-use-one-for-gaming/ https://www.netzwelt.de/tutorial/169130-windows-10-so-erstellt-ram-disk.html https://www.wintotal.de/tipp/ramdisk/ War bei mir nie im Fokus, aber jetzt wo du es sagst...Selbst wenn der Nutzen für uns Normalouser evtl. kaum merkbar ist. Ich hab 32GB DDR4 auf meinem Rechenknecht verbaut, kann ich über's WE mal etwas damit experimentieren.

That is your opinion. Although I didn't print myself out completely correctly. I think the MFDs are easier to read over the day (like in de FA-18C the Map is off). I also think that with the TPOD you can recognize goals better now. However, you are absolutely right, at night this thing is pure horror.

This whole discussion is not expedient. Take a look at the newsletter from January 08, 2021. It's written in black and white: Enhanced AI Behaviour Currently, much of our AI engineering effort is focused on the AI aircraft behaviour, in harmony with the new damage modelling and in line with logical and understandable rules and practices. Additionally, the new ATC and radio communications will demand a significant amount of AI engineering. This work is ongoing and will probably never really be finished but we do hope to deliver substantial enhancements during the latter half of 2021. Even if it's annoying, we just have to be patient. Actually, we DCS players should have learned that by now ...

In my opinion, when an AIM-9 is triggered, the F-14 still has the best sound. I find the new sound more pleasant, nice that ED has changed something here. But it all sounds the same. But as I already wrote in another threat, there are larger, more important construction sites in DCS. Or?