Tiger-II

:lol::lol::lol:

Confirmed. Even when DL is lost due to azimuth, the missile still reacts to WP changes in flight.

Is J-11 too much? H-6 could be interesting, too (we currently don't have any heavy bombers).

Your thread title should read: "AIM-54 has same range as SD-10". You posted in the wrong forum. * SMH * AIM-120C is nearly there from videos I've seen. Looking good. As already stated, AIM-54 has a major glitch at pitbull, which has existed pretty much since release. SD-10 would even do that in some situations. Nice graph! Looks like the SD-10 has about nailed it.

Jeff has low max positive g limit at 700 kts which doesn't help. Idle, pull the brakes, and pull for everything she's got.

You're right. Edited. I saw a video the other day of an AIM-120C launch in DCS, fired at 60 NM from high altitude. It hit the other (non-maneuvering) aircraft 60 NM later at Mach 3.0. They said it was "cool". Imagine if that had been the SD-10 on release day...

Never noticed. Can the launch RADAR see through hills?

Bug. Shouldn't happen. Missile is programmed at launch and flies autonomously. There is no data link for route guidance. I think I don't see this because I either fire one at a time, or two at the same target area. I'll try this later!

I like it! Makes imminent doom seem less threatening. :lol:

Day 1 of learning AAR...

:thumbup:

When are we likely to see the next patch? Waiting for WMD7 video update.

* Checks notes * You either need to update WP30 with new coordinates prior to firing the second missile, or use DIR mode. If you want both missiles to fly different pre-planned routes, you must re-program the coordinates between firing missiles, so have your coordinates ready.

SEAD? Depends what the air threat is, too, and how far I need to go, but a couple of options: * 2x PL-5EII * 2x SD-10 * 2x LD-10 * 2x wing tanks * 1x SPJ If air threats are not great: * 2x PL-5EII * 2x LD-10 or 4x LD-10 (being mindful the dual-pylons hit aircraft performance quite hard/increase fuel burn). * 2x wing tanks * 1x SPJ If I'm out to really cause trouble: * 2x PL-5EII * 2x LD-10 * 1x WMD7 on outer pylon * 2x BRM * 1x center-line fuel If I'm hitting EWR then I'll bring along MITM AKG's.

I knew I saw that somewhere!!! My girlfriend had to search it for me (she speaks Mandarin) and I'm unable to search it again. :lol: It was possible to carry 4xBRM in DCS, but they removed it. I don't know why.

Buy it! Best module out there! Not only is it the best DCS module, it is also one of the most versatile aircraft that we'll see for a while.

Yes. Why not? All you've done is convince me they did a great job with the engine. RD-93 is not an RD-33, and they made great improvements. Fuel efficiency was one of the aims of the improvements as increased fuel efficiency = more thrust (and this is what they achieved). Don't forget also that the RD-93 has different design stators which I think are controllable in the -93 and fixed in the -33. This alone makes a huge difference.

I haven't heard it, either.

This is DCS - blow up everything! I often shoot up my own base, then land and re-arm. Saves the transit time to a target. :megalol: Would be good to have some practice smoke bombs though. I don't think there are any munitions like that for the JF-17.

JF-17 can piggy-back on the back of E-3A or A-50 if they're in the mission for DL, but they can't share directly with the other non-JF-17 aircraft without.

Eurofighter is largely a project about keeping the European aerospace industry in business. The different Tranches are a joke - to "upgrade" they must scrap the airframes and buy new ones as the upgraded/new avionics do not fit the old models. This is why Tranche 1 is AA only, with basic AG capability. Tranche 2 added ability to carry a TGP and for it to lase its own targets. Tranche 3 adds AESA RADAR, and the stuff it should have had as Tranche 1. From first operational flight to when it becomes as capable as Tornado/Harrier it will be nearly 30 years old. It's a joke.

In what sense? Are you maintaining RADAR lock?

* Makes chicken noises on Guard * I switch off DL if I need the second radio. It's an easy change on the UFCP.

That's not just me then! :D Even the way she says "Danger! Danger!" is not conducive to pulling the handle.

I had better luck coming in at a steep angle. The missiles seem not to be flying fast enough, which is why they seem to be struggling. Anyone checked the speed in F6?