-
Posts
2544 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Tom Kazansky
-
I try to put it easier: I take a module in trial and use it like those "5 modules" from above. So ED should take those away from me in 3 years without earning 1 single buck? Good luck. It's just a guess but I think the trial period is not for learning modules but for getting a feeling about them. The only reason ED gifts us with 14 days and not just 2 hours like Steam does imho is that a lot of modules that I hated the for the first 2 days I learned to love some days later. But don't get me wrong, I could easily live with it if ED followed your proposal.
-
I guess it worked for Heatblur with the F-4 not to heat up the hype train. And probably the Typhoon is more a 2024/25 module. So I for one wasn't too surprised.
-
DCS Newsletter discussion 6th January 2023 - 2023 and beyond | DCS core
Tom Kazansky replied to BIGNEWY's topic in DCS 2.9
+1 please -
it is not DCS but it is a first taste (to me).
-
I should have added "compared to the 3080". I do agree in general and have only little to none hope that we could get close to good old times again.
-
Thanks for the info. I missed FSR in the recently posted to do list for DCS in 2023 though. Is there any sign for hope that I missed?
-
That wouldn't be bad for the money and power consumption of the 4070 ti.
-
DCS Newsletter discussion 6th January 2023 - 2023 and beyond | DCS core
Tom Kazansky replied to BIGNEWY's topic in DCS 2.9
"Multithreading has been one of our primary efforts to improve DCS performance, and it is currently in closed beta testing. Initially two threads (graphical and logical) will be implemented, and once the technology is stable and mature, we plan to expand this number." Well, that's great news! Thank you! -
I'm sure the new RTX 4070 ti is good for DCS in 2D even at 4k. With this thread I want to ask people about their experiences with it in VR. Does it make sense or is the 4080 that much better to be worth that higher price tag?
-
AMD 7 series X3D announced
Tom Kazansky replied to AngleOff66's topic in PC Hardware and Related Software
I read it on the German Hardwareluxx.de last night right after AMD's CES announcements. https://www.hardwareluxx.de/index.php/news/hardware/prozessoren/60159-ryzen-7000-mit-mehr-cache-amd-stellt-gleich-drei-x3d-modelle-vor.html "Da nur einer der CCDs mit dem SRAM-Chip bedeckt wird, kann AMD auf dem zweiten CCD die hohen Boost-Taktraten halten. Jedes CCD hat also seine Stärken – eines kommt mit zusätzlichen 64 MB an L3-Cache daher, das andere bietet die hohen Boost-Taktraten." means "Because only one of the CCDs is covered with the SRAM chip, AMD can maintain high boost clock rates on the second CCD. So each CCD has its strengths - one comes with an extra 64MB of L3 cache, the other offers the high boost clock speeds." -
AMD 7 series X3D announced
Tom Kazansky replied to AngleOff66's topic in PC Hardware and Related Software
right, but it seems that only the CCD without the X3D cache has the higher boost clock. So for the new multithreading (or dualthreading) DCS core, the 7800X3D could be CPU of choice because(!) of the single CCD architecture. I'm looking forward to VR comparisons to th 5800X3D in DCS. -
Der Tornado scheint noch ganz schön weit weg zu sein. Also mehr "beyond" als alles was man gezeigt hat?
-
DLSS
-
Jo, und bei der Hornet steht die Ground Speed im HSD rechts neben dem "Flugzeug" im Zentrum.
-
hi, ich weiß jetzt nicht ob ich das richtig mitbekommen hab, aber falls du die F-16C noch nicht hast: die ist grad zum (fast) ersten Mal mit nem -50% Rabat im Sale und billiger wird die nicht (von "rudimentär" ist sie mittlerweile auch seeeehr weit entfernt.) Viel Spaß! Hier bist du auf jeden Fall richtig!
-
The Mirage 2000C allows you to select an altitude which is held when reached but it is not like OP requests neither.
-
My thought was: if the GBU dropped from the front still misses, it is not a case of missing ability to glide, but something in the tracking/controlling of the GBU (in DCS). Maybe the rate or magnitude of corrections.
-
That would be better, but it would not explain completely what's going on in OP's case.
-
Reading all the tread it could be interesting what happens when the GBU is dropped from the other direction relative to the moving target, i.e. from the front. The OP shows an aspect angle almost right from behind. The result should help us getting closer to the culprit of the shown behaviour. (Sorry, that I can't do this myself at the moment.)
