Tom Kazansky

Thanks for the quick response. Everything works fine now.

Could somebody plz type a short text of the important parts because here on my side I just see a white/empty post.

I love those too, but they are not mentioned in any DCS Newsletter threads. (edit: it's Kola btw.)

Don't know if it helps, but here is all I found about Koalas and sharks

That's a tricky path to go. I've turned my back on many PvP games that have sophisticated anti cheat systems however it seems those are very appealing to the most annoying kind of hackers that seem to say: here I am in spite of your efforts! I understand why ED hasn't gone this road yet.

Are you aware that the logbook is just an open editable file? Your idea would work if the servers held those logs and the clients didn't change their callsigns.

Agreed. But it almost scares me to imagine that this kind of dedication, passion and commitment should not be enough. I got your point though.

AMD's Zen 4 CPUs will be introduced in two days. nVidia's RTX 4090 is already produced and available in October. My advice if you want a rig that handles DCS "at the highest level": wait some weeks.

DCS is still very much alive because they have no competition at all.... makes it easy to stay alive don't you think when your product is basically the only modern product out there. To me that says it is not easy at all when no one but you provides such a product. Easy things don't come without competitors imho.

This leads to a very interesting field of questions. Will there be a world for every (or some) times in history? WWII, Korea, Vietnam, cold war, post cold war...? And what about seasons? ...

This is what I do. All the way down. Looks pretty good, even in VR (G2, 100% SteamVR).

In the quoted interview (from 14th October 2021) Wags said: "We've been working on that technology for about a year and a half now and it's coming along quite well." edit: thanks for sharing it btw.

If I understand Wags correctly this new team (like every other new team) wants and has to prove that they understood how map building works. And this with a terrain that is not a vital and urgently needed in the line of DCS warfare terrains. After this, they might be able and allowed to do a region that we all want and need. From this point of view, is it really so wrong to start with northern Australia?

That's why an answer would be that interesting (but unrealistic at the same time, I know). It wasn't meant too seriously that's why the " ". Thanks for caring.

Thank you for clarifying. My post aimed a little bit at the part of wags' post with the "conflict with existing map plans" though, and every other answer than a "yes, of course" gives me enough hope. So thank you again.

If I had such a team an our dream was to do Vietnam, would you allow us?

I wonder how this thread develops in a few hours when the Australiens got out of bed

Agreed but check the amount of 0's in your earlier post and you will understand mine.

Planet? (If there were that many Australian this map would be a huge success. )

Just do it by editing OP and you will see the title above the OP can be edited. Then save.

Those things happen. What about a deal? Post just one WIP picture of the Heatblur DCS F-4 and all is forgiven.

ED sagt allerdings immer wieder, dass über die Hälfte des Teams am DCS Core arbeitet und nicht Teil der Teams ist welche die Flugzeuge/Module machen.

Thanks @Rudel_chw for giving me the opportunity to comment those videos with: "This Notso is pretty darn cool!" I already like the Razbam Strike Eagle for DCS and those videos make it a no brainer for me.

Where did you get this list from? At least Germany never used any variant of the Hun. (edit: I can't speak for the UK, the Netherlands and Italy)

Danke für die Einblicke in Sachen die wir in DCS nie erleben werden. (Wobei ich mich freu, dass hier meine Füße die Farbe nicht ändern. )