Tom Kazansky

In the quoted interview (from 14th October 2021) Wags said: "We've been working on that technology for about a year and a half now and it's coming along quite well." edit: thanks for sharing it btw.

If I understand Wags correctly this new team (like every other new team) wants and has to prove that they understood how map building works. And this with a terrain that is not a vital and urgently needed in the line of DCS warfare terrains. After this, they might be able and allowed to do a region that we all want and need. From this point of view, is it really so wrong to start with northern Australia?

That's why an answer would be that interesting (but unrealistic at the same time, I know). It wasn't meant too seriously that's why the " ". Thanks for caring.

Thank you for clarifying. My post aimed a little bit at the part of wags' post with the "conflict with existing map plans" though, and every other answer than a "yes, of course" gives me enough hope. So thank you again.

If I had such a team an our dream was to do Vietnam, would you allow us?

I wonder how this thread develops in a few hours when the Australiens got out of bed

Agreed but check the amount of 0's in your earlier post and you will understand mine.

Planet? (If there were that many Australian this map would be a huge success. )

Just do it by editing OP and you will see the title above the OP can be edited. Then save.

Those things happen. What about a deal? Post just one WIP picture of the Heatblur DCS F-4 and all is forgiven.

ED sagt allerdings immer wieder, dass über die Hälfte des Teams am DCS Core arbeitet und nicht Teil der Teams ist welche die Flugzeuge/Module machen.

Thanks @Rudel_chw for giving me the opportunity to comment those videos with: "This Notso is pretty darn cool!" I already like the Razbam Strike Eagle for DCS and those videos make it a no brainer for me.

Where did you get this list from? At least Germany never used any variant of the Hun. (edit: I can't speak for the UK, the Netherlands and Italy)

Danke für die Einblicke in Sachen die wir in DCS nie erleben werden. (Wobei ich mich freu, dass hier meine Füße die Farbe nicht ändern. )

Danke für die Info. Hatte mich schon immer gefragt, ob man sich in der Luft in so nem Jet auch wohl fühlen kann, mit den ganzen Überlebensklamotten und Anti-G-Anzügen. Was mich zu ner weiteten Frage bringt: braucht man im Tornado überhaupt Anzüge die einem die G-Belastungen erleichtern?

jo bin ich. hinten und vorn war aber zu der Zeit noch jung und da fielen mir die Temperaturen (wahrscheinlich vor Aufregung) nicht auf. Ich stell mir Hitze bei den Belastungen z.B. im Tiefflug ganz schon schwierig vor. Stresst einen das nicht extrem? Oder merkt man das erst hinterher? das hört sich gut an.

Welcome to DCS World. I find your expectations and hopes about the ATC very refreshing. But let me say ATC in DCS is not realistic yet. (Supercarrier is a different story and also WIP). But to be fair: ED is working on a huge overhaul of ATC with no ETA. I for one use ATC only to simulate immersion. Even though ATC ignores almost everything I do right and wrong. So don't take it too seriously until the big update that most of us are looking very much forward to.

When activated, this little clock should be flashing in bright colors whenever one of the drop down menus for adding stuff is used, because there are lots of (legit) threads like this one.

Yes, that's it. IIRC large is 30 km, medium is 20 and small is 10.

Have you tried to give the Hapoon a longer search range by activating them earlier? This way the speed of the target has less impact. edit: or did your Hapoon lock the target and has been "outturned"? Hard to imagine that a moving target of the size of a navy ship with 10 to 30 knots could do that.

... but only after multicore implementation for DCS please.

Your thread reminds me of another with the same issue. At the end of the day the tire wasn't blown while landing but it has already been blown on take off because its max speed has been exceeded. Just an idea to think about. (I haven't watched your huge track though.)

I like the rest of the cockpitsounds very much. The F-14 gives a lot more feedback this way than other modules. Seems like I have to live with that limitation of an unchangeable squelch volume.

this problem still exists in newest stable DCS (=current OB). is there no way to get the squelch sound connected to the volume knob? (or at least off by an option?) it doesn't make sense to me that I can turn down jester's volume to zero but the squelch still blows my ears. (almost needless to say: I love the Tomcat, but I hate to press the button for the jester-menu and hear squelch all the time till I found what I wanted in the menu.)

I want to bump this thread with a track because even after some changes to the wing sweep related systems this old issue is still not solved. newest Stable DCS 2.7.16.28157 (= current OB) see the very short track, please. 1.) What I did: just scrolled the mouse wheel downwards (nothing else) expected behaviour: sweep lever should stay down (max oversweep position) what happens: sweep lever magically jumps into maximum top position and spreads the wings to the max. 2.) after the first jump to the top position the track shows another related issue: I scrolled the mousewheel downwards from the top position of the lever and it gets stuck at the position where it should go to oversweep. I waited for the wings to reach max sweep, but downscrolling the mousewheel does not push the lever over this "detent". Only grabbing the lever with the left mouse button and pulling it downwards a bit does the job. After that I once again scrolled the mousewheel down and the (2nd) jump to the max forward position occurred a soon as lever reaches the max oversweep position. Issue here: I don't see why the scrolling can't do what grabbing with the left mouse button can at the "detent". F-14B 2.7.16 Wing Sweep Lever Mousewheel Bug Caucasus 01.trk