Krez

I have a T16000m stick and throttle and I am not having that issue. You can use the NWS button to zoom in on the MAV display.

You are correct. He could be considered a pilot. Also, he will never be in the front seat.

I would give up the radar for more ammunition.

I'll take two cannons and the radar.

It's actually at a lower volume now than it used to be.

To each his own.

It's not intuitive because the Harrier wasn't designed with the TPOD in mind. Once you get the ryhem down it gets easier.

I'll take an early access release without the radar.

When I'm in the KA-50, I rarely find myself above treetop level.

Did you enter the magnetic variance? It will do just that if you don't.

Depends on your point of view.

Yes, the WSO is not a pilot.

Because we are referring to a military aircraft, we must refer the people in the aircraft as being in the military. Pilots are pilots. WSO's are Combat Systems Officers. A Combat Systems Officer, even if he has a private or commercial pilot's license, is not a military pilot. By your standard, thousands of military personal who are not pilots can be called pilots because they went to IFT.

Using Google translate to have a conversation from English to Polish isn't ideal. It's not a great argument. It's the only argument. WSO's are not pilots in the U.S. Air Force.

There was always movement. We just weren't privy. It's not like they put it on hold.

If the WSO was a pilot, he would wear a Pilot's badge, not a Combat Systems Officer's badge. The WSO may even have a civilian or commercial pilot's license, but he's not a pilot in the Air Force.

The Harrier was my first module purchase after FC3. I have since acquired nearly every jet aircraft except for the two trainers, F-14, JF-17, A-10C. The Harrier in my opinion is more enjoyable for me. The F-16 and F-18 will fly themselves practically. There is a sense of satisfaction when you learn to be effective in the Harrier. Of course, this is just my opinion. Get the trial and see if you like it. Then let us know.

Many people attend Air Force Initial Flight Training (IPT) but don't go to Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT). It doesn't make them a pilot in the Air Force.

He may know how to pilot an aircraft, but he's not doing it for the Air Force. He is not a winged pilot. Pilot badge on top. Combat Systems Officer (WSO) on the bottom.

The WSO is a Combat Systems Officer. They are not pilots. They have a different badge. They go to different schools.

I want to thank AeriaGloria for helping me to understand the changes by putting them in context. My setup WinWing Orion F/A-18 stick and throttle Thrustmaster TFRP rudder. Special Options are set as follows. Stick Trimmer Mode: Instant Trim Pedals Trimmer Mode: Instant Trim Pedals Microswitch Logic: Automatic Off Pedals: Do not Trim Yaw channel is on. I bound the microswitch "Y" to a HOTAS button. Flying the Mi-24 is so much easier now that I understand what everything is doing and how they interact with each other with regards to the AP channels. Again, thank you.

So what if it does? I don't care if it changes every patch if it makes it better and more realistic.

One can only assume that politics played a role.

This is true for every aircraft.

I don't think so. I haven't noticed a difference in the Shkval display. I do have to adjust the contrast and the brightness of the Shkval to get a better picture.