Krez

Are you using your MK1 Eyeball to aim or are you using the radar and uncaged sight?

That's code for, "Damn, we should have thought of that."

I have been flying he KA-50 for a few years now and I have never gotten into VRS. Out of all of the helicopters, the KA-50 I think is the most forgiving when it comes to VRS. The Hind on the other hand is another story.

Correct, but the flip side of that is the funds allocated for CAS must be spent on the CAS mission, otherwise they could lose it to another branch.

Link worked fine. Fix worked fine. Didn't have to remap any controls.

That made me smile, too.

Brilliant. Thank you. I didn't that have that specific MOD but I had another that was outdated. I am now using the one you linked to.

Not sure if I'm doing something wrong but the MACH indicator shows MACH 8.5 when I'm gojng MACH 1.5.

I see this occasionally when I miss something in the startup.

Make no mistake that once the Berlin wall fell and the "West" got their hands on a few Hinds in the 1990's, everything discussed here was tested. If that information is available is another story.

Everything I've read says the Marines never used the AGM-65F. You have secondary sources that have quotes from a pilot which states they did, which is ironic since the only sources for the 109 K4 carrying gun pods are secondary sources that have quotes from pilots. I think people are just wanting some consistency.

You'd be surprised how many people playing DCS, buying modules, and getting others to play the game are doing so because they saw a GR video on YouTube.

It wouldn't in the slightest.

All we have are historians who state the K4 could equip and did equip the gun pods. I'm tempted to purchase those books to see what sources they are using.

The AV-8B we have in DCS can carry and fire IR Mavs just because it could theoretically do it. No Marine squadron ever used the IR Mav. Given this precedent, there should be no issues giving the K4 wing mounted cannons .

Adjust your curves. I used 30 when I had a twist stick. I set my trim to 1 for takeoff. I would go full right rudder and ease off as I gained speed and rudder authority. I would only use toe brakes if they were bound to an axis. Stick full back and a little right. Once you gain rudder authority, stay off of the breaks and ease off of the stick to neutral. Use peripheral vision to try to maintain a straight line. She will lift off without pulling back.

Without a way to control yaw, I would be hard pressed to take off and land in the 109. Does your flight stick have a twist at least?

We need Japanese aircraft. A6M and/or Ki-84 Not sure how many still exist or the documentation required to create an accurate module. WRT to the A6M, it would have to be a late war module since we have late war P-51's and we are getting the F4U-1D.

The column for each device will only be present if the game detects the input. That's a strange one.

It looks like a remnant of Tobii.

Chuck - USAF variant. Charles "Chuck" DeBellevue - 6 kills Duke - USN variant . Randall "Duke" Cunningham - 5 kills

I'm just pointing out that a precedent has been set, so it's not outside the realm of possibility.

He was making a joke.

An Exocet is possible given that the Harrier we have in game has a Maverick it never mounted or used IRL. So a precedent has already been set.