Airhunter

I'll believe it when I see it on my virtual jet.

Yes! It would only cause confusion. I personally dont even like having an old cartboard box model in DCS still, while new have these new and update models. Just feels off moving forward if there still is such an inconsitence between models.

I would say just look at your TID repeater and steer towards DL contacts and make Jester pick them up, select TWS AUTO or STT and go from there.

This is ED, they probably forgot about it. Pylon drag is one of many basic features that are fairly simple to fix/implement that are still missing.

Can we expect a spring update?

The GBU-24 especially is pretty different from the Paveway II's we have. Offers some interesting capabilities.

Is this planned for a near future update as you guys are working on the landing gear now as well? Seems like a rather quick thing to fix (pylons).

Obviously he's the CEO and likes to suggar coat everything and make his company look good. Duuuhh...

Yes, I'm sorry but that's kinda an area I know quite a lot about and small fighter jets wont create as significant of vortices as is shown in some videos. You can gladly argue that with me via PM.

So the development of the super carriers broke the default carriers, causes massive lag and thus doesn't even allow 3rd parties like Heatblur to implement their carriers properly now since it's all the same base code? DICE PLEASE.

Yeah dont see why a simple hotfix can't be pushed?

I get that and I doubt that's going to happen considering just how much work is still needed. My question is though, why add SLAM, SLAM ER before the GBU-24 and 32 or not even finish the currently useless Harpoon first? Seems like it's all kinda backwards

Can confirm. Reproducable after about 5 minutes of flying...

More than a year ago the GBU-24B and 32 were teased in a Hornet Mini-Update, showing off the new models. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3816104&postcount=137 Since then there hasn't been any mention of those. Can we see these weappons relatively soon as especially the GBU-24A/B would benefit a lot of other modules such as the F-14, F-16 and Mirage?

Apparently a low priority so it's best to turn them off for now.

It is, as they paid money for it upfront. Same goes with any form of constructive and factual criticism for a product that has been purchased.

Oh boy.

It's best to turn it off. I've seen a Mirage get sucked up and flipped on the ground by wakes from a relatively slow plane from above. It's completely unrealistic and I don't know what whacky formula ED used to calculate the strenght of them.

Good luck and all the best wishes and a speedy recovery to said member!

Hope we can soon replace this old 14A AI model with Heatblur's. :)

Do some math. You also got the rearm/refuel window.

Now that is interesting. Have you tried deleting the control config files and re-binding everything from scratch?

Depress the brakes fully then pull the parking brake lever. Should work afaik.

Have you not seen the Hornet and F-16 release?

And have a BRC readout both in ME and on the F10 map, that is really easy to code.