Minsky

See if you have other (slower) ships in the same group with Essex.

* in Uzbekistan.

The modern variant is too modern and westernized, I guess? They (there is another person with similar request) want a nondescript jungle frankenmap to cosplay other conflicts. Chances that either request will even be considered are zero to none.

If it breaks something, as in your example, then it's a bug that needs fixing. No arguing here. But if it's purely cosmetic, then I'm not bothered. Considering there's likely a very tight budget for a number of unique objects they can put on a map. And I would rather have it spent on a city-defining building or monument instead of a slightly different shelter. Contrary to what some people may believe, landmarks are not useless eye-candies or a waste of resources.

No, the video is true to the real-world documents. You're confusing MODE 1 and MODE 1 ALPHA.

They are both important. Personally, however, I would prefer a landmark that makes a city recognizable and unique over a correct HAS model.

Anyone with the basic knowledge of the area (which obviously includes the devs) understands that OP is referring to the most prominent landmark in Haifa and to the UN headquarters in Lebanon. Being "much more specific" would require him to provide the building's blueprints. How else would you call a wish list topic that requests more POIs for a map that is missing dozens (if not hundreds) of them?

The devs call these the "medium detail zones", and as far as I understand, they weren't meant to have any landmarks. Only a couple airbases for flying to neighboring countries, surrounded by generic OSM data. Unless they choose to further develop these zones by adding more airfields, I wouldn't expect anything you have listed.

It's more useful as a landmark than a blank spot.

There were complaints, yes. The general consensus is that the runways are supposed to be uneven. You'll have to convince ED with tracks that this is indeed a problem that affects normal rolls (i.e. no overspeeding, no hard landings etc.) As for the taxiways, it has been acknowledged years ago. Still not fixed. P.S. There is a separate section for bug reporting.

The cycling is only needed if the fire warning tests have been performed. And since these are not strictly necessary in DCS, cycling can also be skipped. That's why they both appear as optional items:

See the title. The tower frequencies are not defined.

LLRP now. Should be LLRD.

I agree. This map desperately needs a quality pass to add finer details and POIs, refine the GIS data, and make everything look less like a reheated Caucasus. It appears that the team simply lacks the manpower to do this in time for leaving the EA. Hopefully, they'll get to it once the base work is done, like they did with the Falklands.

According to the roadmap in the first post here, they have delivered all planned aerodromes and then threw in some more for free. I am also not aware of any game-breaking issues with Sinai. Sure there are bugs and plenty of room for improvement, but you're making it look like the map barely works and the devs are some scammers, which is not the case.