159th_Falcon

Even though i don't have issues myself whit DRM. There is something to say for the ability to play SP without any internet connectivity. Specially if a game is already activated once (by whatever means, prolly internet)

No, the 2.4 patch can come any time. 64 bits only will come in the next few months. You must see them as two sperate things, totally unrelated to each other. For example, 64 bits might be included in .2.5 but maybe it will be .2.9? Or even 3.x ???

And they let the rest of europe pay for it............

Some very nice pics again, thank's for putting them up DazzyD.

Rest In Peace Jim.

You forgot : (

Speak for yourself please, thank you.

No, don't stop, these pictures are awesome! (any ruskie ones per change?)

But at the same time you will also be approaching the target while guiding the missile. So upon impact of the missile, when are you further away? When missile was fired from a hover or when missile was fired from forward flight? Anyone saffy enough to do the calculations?:book:

Well, assuming it isn't an eventless 6 hour long CAP, i wouldn't mind. Operating Radar and other sensors to make things go BOOM can be a blast. Not to mention the CO-OP whit the pilot and other players.

Viper, Really. Haven't you shown off that video quite enough yet? :D:joystick:

No point in having AWACS for the Ruskies, its bugged and shows datalink targets that don't exist (anymore) Also calls out targets that are not there and does not call out targets that are there. Hopefully, this will be fixed in the future.

Here's a thread going into the subject a little more detailed. http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=54965&highlight=russian+radar+settings Must be some pictures around somewhere illustrating the radar beam on different range/elevation settings.

ED Already announced an DCS level SU-27SM. They didn't say when it will be released though.

Why? F-15 has done it in real life, A10 as well. Why not SU-25 (T) ??

Nice pit, video is fun also, whit us hearing on the back ground. (luckily you won't hear me to often) Wondering though, why no Track IR?

There was a guy making his own tank simulator that asked ED if he could develop modules for DCS World. Though for the moment ED will not allow this yet. (believe reason was CA still being either in Beta or just very new) Maybe that's what your remembering?

It has an AFM, not an SFM. That there are differences between AFM models is fairly obvious in my opinion. Its still an AFM though. According ED's own words.

Didn't read the whole post, but yes, the difference in volume between in cockpit and open cockpit or outside view can be deafening at times. Personally i adjusted the ingame sound sliders to solve this, but the default ratio's ma have to be set differently.

Nope, advanced flight model, just like SU-25, ka50, a10c and p51d

True, but if you have 60 FPS, what's the point of having more? The sim is playing just fine for me, event at 25 fps average.

Pretty sure the SA-10 should give a lock and later an launch warning on the RWR. If its not doing so in FC3 then that is most likely a bug.

Wha?????? Workload intensive vikhrs? AP for Steady dive? Someone's got a deathwish........ Aquire your targest from beyond 10 km, remember the area, extend to at least 15 km. Line up and lock target whit skval, one your about 11 km away line up skval indicator and vikhr targeting circle, one you got LA launch. No need for AP. As for using the AP, here's some tips. Don't make any inputs in the channels the AP is engaged on. For example, make no pitch inputs if you in aLtitude hold mode. Disengage AP before making ANY inputs in the channels its commanding. And above all, NEVER use it in a dive, certainly no steep dives. Low level use of AP is fine, just make sure to disengage it before taking control yourself again. Really, the ONLY times the AP gives me trouble is when i mess things up myself. The AP of the SU25T is way better and more functional then that of the A10C to btw.

Let me google that for you. But yes, pretty much means its not feature freeze yet. Highly unlikely anything will be added though.

Very impressive list, as usual. Found the following the most interesting though; The S-5 rocket warhead changed from HE to shaped-charge. Those used to be pretty much useless. Now i see em, partly due to large number of them per pod, being effective anti armor weapon. Probably won't take out an T90 and the like all that easy but hope it will destroy columns of BTR/BMP/Bradley/Stryker and the like. SU-25, 8 of those pods, and let her rip.