Jump to content

buceador

Members
  • Posts

    599
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by buceador

  1. I think that's number 23,468 on the to-do list? Honestly, ME makes me weep sometimes... Increasingly I find it disheartening that ED focuses on 'look here at this new shiny thing' rather than improving the archaic ME or bringing long term assets 'up to speed' I well understand that they are primarily driven by the need to make money, they are a business after all but at what cost I ask myself...
  2. Sadly that doesn't work either, I used a Group stop / Group continue trigger and that seems to keep them on the road.
  3. Try this... Convoy stay on road.trk
  4. Thank you for all your input, it has been most valuable - increasingly I find it disheartening that ED focuses on 'look here at this new shiny thing' rather that bringing long term assets 'up to speed' I well understand that they are primarily driven by the need to make money, they are a business after all but at what cost I ask myself...
  5. I can see tha! Ok, so we are saying that the SSK Kilo-class (Type 636) sub in DCS uses the essentially the same fire and hope unguided torpedo technology despite the spec listed below? I asking because if this is true then the DCS subs are essentially eye candy and serve a very limited purpose in terms of the mission design. !The submarine is equipped with six 533mm forward torpedo tubes situated in the nose of the submarine and carries 18 torpedoes with six in the torpedo tubes and 12 stored on the racks. Alternatively, the torpedo tubes can deploy 24 mines. Two torpedo tubes are designed for firing remote-controlled torpedoes with very high accuracy. The computer-controlled torpedo system is provided with a quick-loading device. The first salvo is fired within two minutes and the second within five minutes. Sensors on board SSK Kilo-class (Type 636) submarine Type 636 is fitted with the MGK-400EM digital sonar. This provides detection of submarine and surface ship targets in sonar listening mode, echo-ranging in a ±30° sector of the target relative bearing, telephone and telegraph communication in both long and short-range modes, detection of underwater sound signals and determination of the signal bearing. The submarine’s radar works in periscope and surface modes and provides information on the underwater and air situation, radar identification, and navigational safety.!
  6. Thank you but... "Most modern torpedoes have their own sonar capable of tracking a target by bouncing an acoustic echo off it and then measuring the distance to target. That method is known as active sonar." So DCS torpedoes are simply 'dumb (aquatic) bombs' ?
  7. That is great as long as right clicking allows you to rename them. Personally I do not mind where it is put as long as it's customisable.
  8. Good to know, thanks for the heads up, it's depth related (and so bears no resemblance to real life) but... In your example of the Santa Fe firing the torpedo it misses, in my experience, even when I get the sub to fire it always misses its target, check the trk file please. Torpedoes miss.trk It is as if the torpedo is launched but has no guidance system.
  9. Submarines do not engage enemy ships and enemy ship(s) do not engage submarines? Subs and ships ignore each other.trk
  10. I actually didn't realise until recently that you couldn't mission start with a helo transporting cargo slung beneath until I tried to add that to a mission I was designing! I've kinda given up on ME improvement suggestions as I don't believe that the most basic omissions will be addressed in my lifetime - not because I think ED is lazy, simply because these omissions would take an inordinate amount of time and if the work doesn't generate revenue, in the short or long term. it is low priority.
  11. Maybe the title should be Illogical AI Group Attack - I have mentioned before that the list of 'fixes' needed for the ME is endless and will probably never be addressed as many of the more basic functions would require a total rewrite. With respect to AI attacking logic. try something as simple as getting a submarine to attack a stationary vessel...
  12. @BIGNEWY Any news on this 'would be great to have' function?
  13. Will this basic functionality come with the Chinook release?
  14. @BIGNEWY Thoughts?
  15. Then perhaps we need to bring it to the attention of 'moderators / devs' - I have noticed for years that contrails are only visible, at certain distances, using the zoom facility which, clearly, goes against any realism mooted by ED.
  16. Is the visibility linked to the preload radius?
  17. I think that as @sirrah, an F-16 mechanic, states that it is not possible as well as pointing out that the air intake would ingest all kinds of detrimental debris it should be accepted that this does NOT reflect reality and therefore should be investigated. Thank you. TO from grass.trk
  18. Upload the .miz file in question?
  19. It looks very cool but as I don't do carrier ops I think I'll stick with the original. (If only they would update it - sigh...)
  20. Do we lose many of the coastal airfields?
  21. Nice one ED - Great attention to detail!
×
×
  • Create New...