buceador

True, however a quick glance at the market place will reveal products around the same price point offering multiple airframes and global destinations. As I have said before, DCS has somewhat of a monopoly at the moment which allows them to dictate pricing. Having said that we all have a choice - purchase or don't purchase, no one forces our hand...

Whilst I totally agree we must accept that ALL advertising involves an element of subterfuge. The aim of promotional advertising is to build awareness of a product, increase a product's sales and boost overall revenue, to that end a certain amount of 'artistic licence' is incorporated. I make DCS cinematic videos, in the course of 'production' I often eliminate elements that detract from the overall 'enjoyment' of the video or that break the immersion. The only difference is that I am not selling anything... Their disclaimer says it all.

I posted something about this module a couple of weeks ago basically saying that I had included it as AI in a mission and as soon as it spawned the mission became a slide show, I replaced it with the original DCS Chinook and it ran perfectly...

I imagine, as with many concepts in life, they balance one against the other.

Actually, much as I respect your comments @Rudel_chw, that is a little naive; in that in the world of realistic aerial combat simulators DCS is a one horse race...

Agreed!

Extremely well put! I think you hit all the points perfectly. EA is akin to a builder asking for a proportion of the payment in advance in order to purchase the necessary materials, this is common practice in the construction world, perhaps not so common in the video game market but in DCS it exists for the very same reason, or so it seems to me.

This! I have all the other maps but Syria and Caucasus account for 90% of my DCS time. I think it's more a case of misplaced eternal optimism with regard to the maps.

Does it crash before the explosion occurs?

Hi Rudel_ch! This was referred to in the original post, inclusivity was never the issue, for me it was all about / immersion / realism, as for my female friend's original comment, she was simply stating a fact, that apart from bitchin' betty, everything in DCS was male. Still not sure how it relates to the given context?

And hopefully the woefully inadequate taxi / take off lights of the F-16?

Yes, a well constructed, passionate response! (not sure what "we "incarned" it" means?)

Today, yes!

You seem to have lost the lock just before your fired?

This!

I don't understand the question?

You probably do not have a SWEDISH livery installed.

/saved games/dcs/config/options.lua ["f5_nearest_ac"] = true, ["force_feedback_enabled"] = false, ["headmove"] = true, ["launcher"] = true, ["show_pilot_body"] = true, ["synchronize_controls"] = true, Change to false

Speaking for myself (as many have said) I see regained performance and an absence of stuttering so, for me, in terms of gameplay I have returned to the halcyon days of pre. the previous 2 patches. No problem associated with the download nor F10 anomalies and none of the issues experienced by some VR players. Many thanks ED.

This!

But if that were the case then the last DCS update would have installed them (and it didn't). I am sure this livery set is not part of the standard DCS install. @BIGNEWY?

Not in my copy of DCS?

Link please?

I sincerely hope that THIS will be part of the next (long awaited) official patch from DCS