RvETito

В полете с поступательной скорости конус нижнего винта получает завал влево и назад (или вперед в зависимости от скорости (режима)) а у верхнего завал получается вправо и соответно назад (вперед). Возникавщие поперечные составляющие тяг оба винтов можно принять равны по величину, но момент который они создавяют по отнешению центра тяжести вертолета будет отличатся посколько у верхнего винта плечо (до ц.т.) намного больше. Это вызовает поперечный и попутный момент, который надо балансировать. За то кроме педаль надо еще и РППУ влево отклонить. Твои коллеги котороые говорят что такое у них нету тебя обманули ;)

You've got it right, that's how it is ;) Keep it that way.

The Ka-50 in BS is able to hover in the ground effect area in OEI conditions at sea level without stores and 200kg fuel and take off accelerating in the IGE zone. When using airplane style take-off you can do it with even higher fuel load with OEI. If you can't do it- you are doing something wrong.

That's the way to go SunDown :thumbup: A lot of the russian guys skipped the systems learning part and are bringing it all the well known Lock On airquake. However, there are a lot of them with the same attitude about learning and understanding before shooting. I would suggest the following approach: Step 1: Watch the training tracks and Wags' Producer's Notes- MANY times. Step 2: If you don't understand something- back it up with the flight manual and the key commands card. Step 3: Learn how to fly it manualy which means to get used to the force trim system. After you're confident you can take-off from a FARP and land on the very same helipad after flying around- move to the combat.

Why did we spend so much time making tha manual and the training tracks then? They ARE the ground school that you're supposed to pass before goin' into battle. To add something to what Shepski wrote: #5- Trim, trim and more trim. #6- Forget about autohover. #7- Go back again to #1, #4, #5 :D

Eh? Where? :D

Подрыв это резкое полно загружение винта до максимального шага. Обычно имеет место при посадке на авторотации или при один работающих движок. Особено на малой высоте в зоне воздушной подушки позволяет увеличить тяга винта на кратко за счет максимального шага, но и провал оборотов. А по ВК- надо привыкнуть смотрит на вариометр при малых скоростях, если высота хватит лучше шаг вниз и ППУ от себя чтобы получит скорость. Если высота нету- чего сказал Yo-Yo. Я довольно количество вертолетов угробил с испытательными целями, за то я герой. :D

Happy Birthday, Matt!

Ninjas are dangerous...

So F-22 can obliterate an entire air force by just showing up. They seem so dangerous that they have to fly alone like F-117, I wonder how many of those one million kills are TK's :D Everyone is talking how they perfrom against other aircraft but more important is how they perform against each other. Is an F-22 able to detect another F-22, at what range and stuff. That's the kind of stuff I want to hear about. And I bet that's the first thing americans have done- to test F-22's in 1v1, 2v2 and many vs. many. Because the most important thing when you have such aircraft is what happens when someone else around the world produces aircraft with the same capabilites.

Hehe :) The BAF mod already does it, though MiG-23 for example is no longer in service. We also have S-75, S-125, S-200, S-300 and Buk along with the other SAMs. BTW, I wouldn't call bulgarian armed forces an army right now ;) What I would love to see is the bulgarian Black sea coast modelled- it has 3 airbases and 2 international airports and very interestng landscape.

Well according to the latest press release the serial production of the Ka-52 has been indeed started at the Arseniev factory. Some of them will use unfinished airframes of single seat Ka-50, plus few new built airframes. The single seat helicopter doctrine is already abandoned by the Russian armed forced though the 8-10 serial Ka-50's will remain in service. I doubt we'll see the Ka-52 in DCS...

When it comes to flight models the best one for fixed wing aircraft is the ED's model of Su-25(T) and is reason N1 why I enjoy flying that plane so much. However, there's already one that beats it, Ka-50's FM in BS :D It's generation ahead of anything that has been created for PC flight sims. If you don't like choppers you'll at least figure what you can expect of DCS series in the future... What I dislike the most in Falcon that's the sleepy behavior in pitch. That's waaay off of FBW's principles of operation. Other than that it's ok, roll rate is like of an aerobatics plane which makes sence.

Koriel, with all due respect but you don't know what you're talking about. DCS having the same AI like Flanker 1 and 2?! That's just silly. I have both sims and have played them a lot, your sentence doesn't come even close to reality. True, it doesn't have YET the battlefield engine that runs in Falcon series but it has a physical model that is generation ahead of any Falcon version. You think that's nothing? Well, think again. DCS will have dynamic campaign technology, but it takes time. One step at a time, you can't have all of it altogether. Look in the credits and see how many programmers the dev team consist of? See my point?

Dual core AMD X2 4200+ (2.21GHz), 3GB RAM, 7800GT video.

My experience indicates that flying over cities or other areas with high density of ground objects doesn't hit frame rates that much like in FC. In general FPS are more fluent now, there is no such thing like 70FPS over sea and 20 over city peaks like in FC.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081031/ap_on_re_us/fallen_angels The team is cut to 5 planes for the rest of the season because one of the pilots has been caught in inappropriate relationship with another person from squadron's personel. Damn beaurocrats! There are no limits for love, don't they know? :D

Don't wonder...

Smoking kills.

Здесь важно пространственое положение вертолета, если делаешь какие-то акробации иногда получается полное загружение винта (зебра горит) потом облекчение при постоянном шаге (меняется не шаг а угол атаки винта). Может привести к срывному режиму некоторых лопастей, они выбегают из конуса винта и вот и перехлест. Скорость и педали в таком случае фактор не будут. При крутых эволюциях, особено по вертикалу, стоит лучше полностю облекчить винт при загорание зебры.

Just make sure you don't have any profile loaded when you fly BS and the mapping in the built-in input feature will work perfectly.

Same here, I have a X52 vanilla and I don't use SST anymore. I only map things that I need for combat and flying, though on the real collective there are some things that I really don't need on my HOTAS like search light steering and rotor RPM governor readjustment. The only things that I added which are not on the flight controls of the real thing is the CM dispense button (the red one on the UV-26 panel) and the laser warning system reset button. Those two you'll definitely need on your HOTAS. I still have a lot of buttons, slider, rotators that I haven't assigned anything to, just no need. I'll share my mapping when I get back.

Можно, плечо поперечной состовляющей верхнего винта больше чем у нижнего, но в общем не так заметно. А надо бы. Это значит что всегда со скольжением летать будешь. Как держишь шарик в середине тогда? В принципе можно но для боевого применения понимаешь что это очень важно.

Это все равно сделать паралельный симулятор, или точнее симулятор симулятора.

Сам это не пробовал, наверняка возможно назначить PageUp/PageDown например на ротаторов на РУДе Х52, но их аналоговое перемещение не получится.