Spartan111sqn

Thanks, I have G2 also, I still using WMR, not sure if to update W11 and move to Oasis... Do you recommend it?, difficult to make it work?

Where did you set it up?

yes please, I would like to see it.

What's that?

patch today?

for me the visors in Hornet and Viper are really great.

I imagine that with 25H2 WMR for G2 dissapears also? (I have discarded 24H2 to avoid miss WMR)

at what distance are you from the target lased?, with Litening you can receive it up to 16nm aprox. but with ATP you need to be at maximum 7nm. yes, the Litening is cheat.

first digit are number of ARH missiles, second digit is SARH, third is IR missiles. 4 120C and 2 IR means 4,0,2. Do you get it.

The number you put in the option is personal?, ok I respect it.

great!, what number you put in the field?

I agree I also agree that it should be neccesary a limited power on for both weapons, it is a cheat that they can last forever, not appropriate for simulator.

Examples of Loadout: 5,0,0,2xext (empty station 9) -> CAT I 5,0,0,2xext (empty station 3 with pylon) --> CAT I .............. with these 2 examples above I see it doesn't depends on the pylon type 4,0,0,2xext (with all pylons) --> CAT I 4,0,2,2xext --> CAT III -> after firing 2 aim9 --> 4,0,0,2xext --> CAT III still why?

Agree with you @RogueSpecterGaming and I see that, but I see a point of incoherence in the example I have put. Same config after shooting (harm or 120s), and have different cat config by the FLCS.

will we see the failures in the F-ACK page? or in the BIT?

But do you see when the aircraft is with LAU-129 and full AA ordnance (LAU-129 in stations 4,6 empty) is CAT III, and with LAU-118 is CAT I? For me seems strange.

@Tholozor do you see my point?, what's you opinion?

Good call @Tholozor, but then the LAU-118 pylons for stations 4 and 6 are more suitable for CAT I than LAU-129?, I would understand the other way around.

Please @BIGNEWYhave a look at it please, two equal final states but with two different behavior from FLCS. If it is correct as it is, then what is the logic behind?

Why when in the viper is only with AA loadout, it cannot be selected the GM/GMT/SEA Radar? Also in the case after firing the AG loadout, and then pure AA loadout, it is possible to switch to GM/GMT/SEA radar. Is the first case a bug?

It is not the way it behaves today in DCS. Another example is that with 2xtanks,2xharms,2x9X,2x120 after shoot the 2 harms, it asks you to put CAT I. But if you have 2xtanks, 4x120, 2xaim9, after shoot 2x120, and then you are in the same config as in the previous case (after shoot the 2xharms), the system doesn't requires you to move to CAT I. Which seems incoherent. Any idea why?

In previous updates in the FCR you could see the name of the aircraft and numeral, for example VIPER11 as VR11 in the radar contact simbology, since several updates it is no longer showing it up.

Hi thanks for all the info, still needed the full alignment or wih STRHDG is enough?

It seems that no red aircraft like mig29, su27, mig21..., is reacting to ARH missiles, also checked on my side, SP and MP. I test it in different circumstances and is very easy to reproduce.

Before jumping in the back seat, ask Jester to designate something, then you can proceed to the back seat and proceed.