Spartan111sqn
Members-
Posts
333 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Spartan111sqn
-
Nice, and thanks, but very complex to do it. Something more plug and play would be nice.
- 488 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- varjo
- vr
-
(and 41 more)
Tagged with:
- varjo
- vr
- windows 10
- overclocking
- 9800x3d
- ryzen 7
- ryzen master
- latencymon
- optimizations
- rog strix
- virtual reality
- latency
- aero
- xrframetools
- 5800x3d
- warthog
- dlaa
- msi afterburner
- windows 11
- a-10
- openxr
- capframex
- micro stutters
- reprojection
- wmr
- qvfr
- obs
- stutter
- perfmon
- msi
- varjo aero
- mt
- frametime
- performance
- microstutters
- ryzen
- g2
- tweaking
- foveated
- dlss
- multithreading
- dlss4
- chatgpt
-
the way should be that all the systems drift in the same way, not one drifting and others not.
-
CBU-99 Zero damage unless scoring a full target hit
Spartan111sqn replied to Kah0tika's topic in Weapon Bugs
Thanks, maybe a doc or white paper indicating some parameters for some weapons is needed, in some cases we are a bit lost on it. -
Couple of Questions re F-16 throttle use and QFE on Afghan map
Spartan111sqn replied to DrDetroit's topic in DCS: F-16C Viper
Also the quantity of weight you have of fuel has a big influence in the viper, you can be just top off after AAR, and barely you can't go beyond FL310 M0.83 and perform a turn smaller than an Airbus, the aircraft starts to slow down even if you are in full MIL and more than 30º of bank with 2xExt, 4x120C,2Aim9. But in the same situation when you have consumed more fuel and you have for example 7000lbs, keeping the same loadout the aircraft performs better, so the drag index is the same, but the weight is around 4.000lbs lower. -
Couple of Questions re F-16 throttle use and QFE on Afghan map
Spartan111sqn replied to DrDetroit's topic in DCS: F-16C Viper
when you were at 38.000ft, I can imagine that you were fully clean, no fuel tanks... Normally 5º AOA is for maximum range at any given altitude, that thumb rule that works, 7º AOA is for maximum endurance at any altitude, anothe thimb rule. when you are in AA 35.000ft, I can imagine that is without any fuel tank, otherwise, you enter in second regime and the AOA of the aircraft and lack of engine response push you to go lower. Normally in a CAP, if you are above a friendly zone (DCA), you can patrol more in Endurance. But if you are in a contested zone, you have to CAP faster, that would be around M 0.85. -
Thanks, I have G2 also, I still using WMR, not sure if to update W11 and move to Oasis... Do you recommend it?, difficult to make it work?
-
Where did you set it up?
-
Expected to lose TNDL team member data if wingmen mode 3 jam?
Spartan111sqn replied to Zectivi's topic in DCS: F-16C Viper
yes please, I would like to see it. -
UPDATE 22nd OCT 25
Spartan111sqn replied to Badger633's topic in F/A-18C Operation Green Line Campaign
patch today? -
for me the visors in Hornet and Viper are really great.
-
I imagine that with 25H2 WMR for G2 dissapears also? (I have discarded 24H2 to avoid miss WMR)
-
cannot produce and mssing track file LST with the Sniper pod
Spartan111sqn replied to davidp57's topic in DCS: F-16C Viper
at what distance are you from the target lased?, with Litening you can receive it up to 16nm aprox. but with ATP you need to be at maximum 7nm. yes, the Litening is cheat. -
first digit are number of ARH missiles, second digit is SARH, third is IR missiles. 4 120C and 2 IR means 4,0,2. Do you get it.
-
The number you put in the option is personal?, ok I respect it.
-
great!, what number you put in the field?
-
correct as-is 2025 F-16 Roadmap on TGP/ATP
Spartan111sqn replied to SubZ3r0's topic in DCS: F-16C Viper
I agree I also agree that it should be neccesary a limited power on for both weapons, it is a cheat that they can last forever, not appropriate for simulator. -
Examples of Loadout: 5,0,0,2xext (empty station 9) -> CAT I 5,0,0,2xext (empty station 3 with pylon) --> CAT I .............. with these 2 examples above I see it doesn't depends on the pylon type 4,0,0,2xext (with all pylons) --> CAT I 4,0,2,2xext --> CAT III -> after firing 2 aim9 --> 4,0,0,2xext --> CAT III still why?
-
Agree with you @RogueSpecterGaming and I see that, but I see a point of incoherence in the example I have put. Same config after shooting (harm or 120s), and have different cat config by the FLCS.
-
will we see the failures in the F-ACK page? or in the BIT?
-
But do you see when the aircraft is with LAU-129 and full AA ordnance (LAU-129 in stations 4,6 empty) is CAT III, and with LAU-118 is CAT I? For me seems strange.
-
@Tholozor do you see my point?, what's you opinion?
-
Good call @Tholozor, but then the LAU-118 pylons for stations 4 and 6 are more suitable for CAT I than LAU-129?, I would understand the other way around.
-
Please @BIGNEWYhave a look at it please, two equal final states but with two different behavior from FLCS. If it is correct as it is, then what is the logic behind?
