Jump to content

Virtual Patriots L-39

Tango
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 222
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Snoopy

Snoopy

Posted
Posted
It had been in work for 2 years? And? It was pretty slow on the news updates till a few weeks ago...

 

Once again you twist and turn posts. What about EDs news updates? Until the last news letter they have been few and far between but we the community have been told "don't worry, we're working on the F/A-18, trust us."

 

So it's ok for one developer to remain virtually silent but not another?

v303d Fighter Group Discord | Virtual 303d Fighter Group Website | v303rd Fighter Group Twitter

image.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites
magpie

magpie

Posted
Posted
It had been in work for 2 years? And? It was pretty slow on the news updates till a few weeks ago...

 

Are you trying to say ED didn't know about the L39 project until a few weeks ago? I'm pretty sure they were aware, everyone who reads these forums knew about it...

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • ED Team
NineLine

NineLine

Posted
  • ED Team
Posted
Once again you twist and turn posts. What about EDs news updates? Until the last news letter they have been few and far between but we the community have been told "don't worry, we're working on the F/A-18, trust us."

 

So it's ok for one developer to remain virtually silent but not another?

 

 

When the agreement is between those 2 parties, its up to them to discuss all this isnt it? And it sounds like it was discussed. What am I twisting?

64Sig.png
Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**

1146563203_makefg(6).png.82dab0a01be3a361522f3fff75916ba4.png  80141746_makefg(1).png.6fa028f2fe35222644e87c786da1fabb.png  28661714_makefg(2).png.b3816386a8f83b0cceab6cb43ae2477e.png  389390805_makefg(3).png.bca83a238dd2aaf235ea3ce2873b55bc.png  216757889_makefg(4).png.35cb826069cdae5c1a164a94deaff377.png  1359338181_makefg(5).png.e6135dea01fa097e5d841ee5fb3c2dc5.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tango

Tango

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
It had been in work for 2 years? And? It was pretty slow on the news updates till a few weeks ago...

 

Slow on (public) news does not make development non-existent.

 

I can't say more due to NDA (believe me, I'd love to tell).

 

Best regards,

Tango.


Edited by Tango
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • ED Team
NineLine

NineLine

Posted
  • ED Team
Posted
Slow on (public) news does not make development non-existent.

 

I can't say more due to NDA (believe me, I'd love to tell).

 

Best regards,

Tango.

 

 

Which is the point here, this is between you and ED to discuss, not sure why its even up for discussion on the forums when most hear have little to know information...

64Sig.png
Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**

1146563203_makefg(6).png.82dab0a01be3a361522f3fff75916ba4.png  80141746_makefg(1).png.6fa028f2fe35222644e87c786da1fabb.png  28661714_makefg(2).png.b3816386a8f83b0cceab6cb43ae2477e.png  389390805_makefg(3).png.bca83a238dd2aaf235ea3ce2873b55bc.png  216757889_makefg(4).png.35cb826069cdae5c1a164a94deaff377.png  1359338181_makefg(5).png.e6135dea01fa097e5d841ee5fb3c2dc5.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snoopy

Snoopy

Posted
Posted
Which is the point here, this is between you and ED to discuss, not sure why its even up for discussion on the forums when most hear have little to know information...

 

Because it looks bad, because it makes the community and I'm sure other 3rd party developers believe if this happened once it will likely happen again so why would they develop for DCS World?

 

How can you not see that? You have a developer who has invested 2 years of money and time into a project to find only a few weeks ago it was all for not? No company in their right mind would take that risk.

  • Like 2

v303d Fighter Group Discord | Virtual 303d Fighter Group Website | v303rd Fighter Group Twitter

image.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites
zaelu

zaelu

Posted
Posted (edited)

Someone said that some virtual squads made planes that did not share with community. To me the L39 by VpjT looked like one of those mods. Sorry... The FB page was full with pics of the team enjoying their mod with almost exclusive formation flying and aerobatics.

 

When I saw Tango being on full throttle coding system after system for the other Team I thought this project (L39 by VPjT) was... let to die.

 

Anyway... This silence is no good. Silence means all can happen. I like how the other project is advertised by many wip info.

 

Sorry for VPjT. I hope is not a financial disaster.

 

For us the comunity is not like we don't get the plane... We get one with multiplayer cockpit capability and with good quality.

 

PS

If a team wants to be sure they make a deal for exclusivity. How is made in FSX? There all are equal... MS doesnt produce anything so 2 teams can very well build same aircraft in complete sicrecy.


Edited by zaelu

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

I5 4670k, 32GB, GTX 1070, Thrustmaster TFRP, G940 Throttle extremely modded with Bodnar 0836X and Bu0836A,

Warthog Joystick with F-18 grip, Oculus Rift S - Almost all is made from gifts from friends, the most expensive parts at least

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tango

Tango

Posted
  • Author
Posted

You're a moderator... saying "it's between VPJT and ED to discuss" doesn't help. You make it appear that we didn't.

 

Facts as we know them:

 

* VPJT started L-39 dev 28 months ago (complete with officially licensed 3rd party developer contract)

* ED announce their own L-39 last week

 

I don't think there is much to discuss.

 

Best regards,

Tango.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Python

Python

Posted
Posted
Which is the point here, this is between you and ED to discuss, not sure why its even up for discussion on the forums when most hear have little to know information...

 

Some third party developers out there have the same info as us however (none) Assumptions will always be made and it doesn't look great from the outside you have to admit. It may put off future investment into DCS which would be a shame for all of us.

 

edit, Paul is too fast...

  • Like 1

[sIGPIC]sigpic67951_1.gif[/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • ED Team
NineLine

NineLine

Posted
  • ED Team
Posted
Because it looks bad, because it makes the community and I'm sure other 3rd party developers believe if this happened once it will likely happen again so why would they develop for DCS World?

 

How can you not see that? You have a developer who has invested 2 years of money and time into a project to find only a few weeks ago it was all for not? No company in their right mind would take that risk.

 

Looks bad on the outside, but you dont know all the facts. But I know thats not good enough for you. Nothing I can do there.

64Sig.png
Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**

1146563203_makefg(6).png.82dab0a01be3a361522f3fff75916ba4.png  80141746_makefg(1).png.6fa028f2fe35222644e87c786da1fabb.png  28661714_makefg(2).png.b3816386a8f83b0cceab6cb43ae2477e.png  389390805_makefg(3).png.bca83a238dd2aaf235ea3ce2873b55bc.png  216757889_makefg(4).png.35cb826069cdae5c1a164a94deaff377.png  1359338181_makefg(5).png.e6135dea01fa097e5d841ee5fb3c2dc5.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites
magpie

magpie

Posted
Posted
Which is the point here, this is between you and ED to discuss, not sure why its even up for discussion on the forums when most hear have little to know information...

 

Because some of us care about the guys who have worked on these projects and take an interest in where and what we spend our cash on

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Taproot

Taproot

Posted
Posted
Because it looks bad, because it makes the community and I'm sure other 3rd party developers believe if this happened once it will likely happen again so why would they develop for DCS World?

 

How can you not see that? You have a developer who has invested 2 years of money and time into a project to find only a few weeks ago it was all for not? No company in their right mind would take that risk.

 

Make sure that what Paulrkiii said here is quoted on every page from now on... Cause that's what many of us are thinking.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snoopy

Snoopy

Posted
Posted
Looks bad on the outside, but you dont know all the facts. But I know thats not good enough for you. Nothing I can do there.

 

I never claimed to, but you just made my point for me. If I was a 3rd party and was thinking about tipping my toe into DCS world I wouldn't because of how this looks on the outside.

v303d Fighter Group Discord | Virtual 303d Fighter Group Website | v303rd Fighter Group Twitter

image.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anastasiuss

Anastasiuss

Posted
Posted (edited)

I see the last update 03.09.2014 https://www.facebook.com/TheVirtuals/posts/10153155485086040

 

before that 21.08.2014 https://www.facebook.com/TheVirtuals/posts/10153118134416040

 

before 02.01.2014 DCS: L-39 UPDATE BY SILENTEAGLE https://www.facebook.com/TheVirtuals/photos/a.10150095035061040.309230.123630916039/10152524774451040/?type=1

...

That was on facebook, but those were updates or not?

 

back to work, While interesting here, but I still have to work:-)


Edited by Anastasiuss

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

360th TFW Falconeers

last video ->

 

ASUS P6X58D Premium, Intel Core i7 920, 6GB DDR3, SAPPHIRE TOXIC HD 5850, Win7 64 Bit. X52, Track IR 4, Momo Racing.

ArmA1+2+3, DCS: World, K-50, A-10C, CA, P-51D, UH-1H, Mi-8FC1+2+3, FalconAF, FC1+FC2, IL2'46, rFactor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tango

Tango

Posted
  • Author
Posted
When I saw Tango being on full throttle coding system after system for the other Team I thought this project (L39 by VPjT was... let to die.

 

Whilst I'm sorry you thought this, it was not the case. SE was working like crazy every waking hour when he wasn't at work. I was fitting stuff in between development of other projects.

 

"Let it die" we certainly did not.

 

Best regards,

Tango.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snoopy

Snoopy

Posted
Posted
I see the last update 03.09.2014 https://www.facebook.com/TheVirtuals/posts/10153155485086040

 

before that 21.08.2014 https://www.facebook.com/TheVirtuals/posts/10153118134416040

 

before 02.01.2014 DCS: L-39 UPDATE BY SILENTEAGLE https://www.facebook.com/TheVirtuals/photos/a.10150095035061040.309230.123630916039/10152524774451040/?type=1

...

That was on facebook, but those were updates or not?

 

In this very thread on 2 September. Right after the ED news letter was released this thread was moved from "Community News" to "DCS Mods"

 

A systems programming update:

 

Complete ADF radio simulation. This doesn't just include the wandering needle and general inaccuracy of the direction finding circuitry, but a COMPLETE simulation of the entire system.

 

List of features:

 

* Simulation of A1, A2 and A3 modulation of the ground station

* Highly accurate BFO tuning mode (yet another simulation first AFAIK)

* BFO mode ident (A1 modulation)

* Audio mode ident (A2 and A3 modulation)

* Accurate BFO tuning capability (characteristic hetrodyne when tuning)

* Sense and loop antennas modelled

* Comparator circuitry modelled, including simulation of cardioid signal pattern in loop antenna

* Automatic DF mode (comparator based)

* Accurate manual DF mode, including accurate signal peak simulation/nulls

* Stations can overlap and interfere with reception

* Accurate analog tuning - no digital on/off selection of the station

* Signal strength is affected by multiple conditions (range, altitude, weather conditions, time of day, accuracy of tuning)

* Coastal effect

* Night effect

* Weather (thunderstorm will cause needle to point away from station, and humidity can affect the signal)

* Static noises and clicks from simulated lightening strikes during thunderstorm and general noise

* Another cool feature that shall remain secret for now... ;)

* Manual and automatic mode for dual ADF approach (single receiver/RBI, dual-head tuner)

* Complete simulation of auto mode for dual-ADF approach

 

Stay *ahem* tuned *ahem* ...

 

Best regards,

Tango.

v303d Fighter Group Discord | Virtual 303d Fighter Group Website | v303rd Fighter Group Twitter

image.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SkateZilla

SkateZilla

Posted
Posted (edited)

I think everyone needs to go back to their corners for a lil bit,

 

All of a sudden we have everyone arguing over this, that, and the 3rd,

 

and Add in the Users that have no idea what's going on adding their assumptions and blanket statements into the mix.

 

It's turned into one big Schoolyard finger pointing marathon.


Edited by SkateZilla

Windows 10 Pro, Ryzen 2700X @ 4.6Ghz, 32GB DDR4-3200 GSkill (F4-3200C16D-16GTZR x2),

ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate, XFX RX6800XT Merc 310 (RX-68XTALFD9)

3x ASUS VS248HP + Oculus HMD, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS + MFDs

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...