Belphe Posted February 12, 2020 Posted February 12, 2020 (edited) "IF".. we get the 2.5.6 this Friday, is there anything coming regarding the Tomcat as well? Thanks ADMIN EDIT: corrected for the right version number. Edited February 17, 2020 by IronMike Never say never, Baby! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
draconus Posted February 12, 2020 Posted February 12, 2020 (edited) 1.5.6 got out 01-27-2017. Have you been hibernated for a few years? ;) Edited February 12, 2020 by draconus Win10 i7-10700KF 32GB RTX4070S Quest 3 T16000M VPC CDT-VMAX TFRP FC3 F-14A/B F-15E CA SC NTTR PG Syria
IronMike Posted February 12, 2020 Posted February 12, 2020 Obviously 2.5.6 was meant, and of course, there are a couple of changes coming in. Heatblur Simulations Please feel free to contact me anytime, either via PM here, on the forums, or via email through the contact form on our homepage. http://www.heatblur.com/ https://www.facebook.com/heatblur/
Belphe Posted February 12, 2020 Author Posted February 12, 2020 Thank you for digging this out from the archive, my my Polish comrade :) Piąteczka! ;) Never say never, Baby! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Harlikwin Posted February 12, 2020 Posted February 12, 2020 Obviously 2.5.6 was meant, and of course, there are a couple of changes coming in. Hints as to what they might be? :D New hotness: I7 9700k 4.8ghz, 32gb ddr4, 2080ti, :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, HP Reverb (formermly CV1) Old-N-busted: i7 4720HQ ~3.5GHZ, +32GB DDR3 + Nvidia GTX980m (4GB VRAM) :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, Rift CV1 (yes really).
IronMike Posted February 13, 2020 Posted February 13, 2020 Hints as to what they might be? :D Fixes. :D Heatblur Simulations Please feel free to contact me anytime, either via PM here, on the forums, or via email through the contact form on our homepage. http://www.heatblur.com/ https://www.facebook.com/heatblur/
Harlikwin Posted February 13, 2020 Posted February 13, 2020 Fixes. :D Fair enough. I was hoping for the forrestal though. New hotness: I7 9700k 4.8ghz, 32gb ddr4, 2080ti, :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, HP Reverb (formermly CV1) Old-N-busted: i7 4720HQ ~3.5GHZ, +32GB DDR3 + Nvidia GTX980m (4GB VRAM) :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, Rift CV1 (yes really).
eatthis Posted February 13, 2020 Posted February 13, 2020 Fix jester using the lantirn lol 7700k @5ghz, 32gb 3200mhz ram, 2080ti, nvme drives, valve index vr
Cobra847 Posted February 13, 2020 Posted February 13, 2020 1.5.6 will mainly be a bugfix release. The transition to 1.5.6 was not trivial unfortunately. Nicholas Dackard Founder & Lead Artist Heatblur Simulations https://www.facebook.com/heatblur/
Steve Gee Posted February 13, 2020 Posted February 13, 2020 Did you have to tweak the afterburners after seeing the new lighting effects in 1.5.6? "These are NOT 1 to 1 replicas of the real aircraft, there are countless compromises made on each of them" - Senior ED Member Modules - Damn near all of them (no Christian Eagle or Yak) System - Ryzen 9 7900X, 64Gig DDR5 RAM, RTX-4090, 3 32" monitors @1440, default settings of High (plus some)
amalahama Posted February 14, 2020 Posted February 14, 2020 Why people keeps referring to 1.5.6 when it was obviously an OP mistake?
Yeti42 Posted February 14, 2020 Posted February 14, 2020 Why people keeps referring to 1.5.6 when it was obviously an OP mistake? This! I'm slightly OCD and this is driving me nuts! ;) Windows 10 64 bit | Intel i5-9600k OC 5 Ghz | RTX 2080 |VENGEANCE® LPX 32GB DDR 4 OC 3200 Hotas Warthog | Logitech G Flight Rudder Pedals | Track IR 4
Steve Gee Posted February 14, 2020 Posted February 14, 2020 This! I'm slightly OCD and this is driving me nuts! ;) Because of this is why it's continued use will never stop. :D "These are NOT 1 to 1 replicas of the real aircraft, there are countless compromises made on each of them" - Senior ED Member Modules - Damn near all of them (no Christian Eagle or Yak) System - Ryzen 9 7900X, 64Gig DDR5 RAM, RTX-4090, 3 32" monitors @1440, default settings of High (plus some)
Cornelius Posted February 14, 2020 Posted February 14, 2020 Why people keeps referring to 1.5.6 when it was obviously an OP mistake?
eatthis Posted February 15, 2020 Posted February 15, 2020 It mentions hrust anddrag have been tweaked but it doesnt say which way lol 7700k @5ghz, 32gb 3200mhz ram, 2080ti, nvme drives, valve index vr
CommanderRabb Posted February 16, 2020 Posted February 16, 2020 1.5.6 will mainly be a bugfix release. The transition to 1.5.6 was not trivial unfortunately. I knew it was a bad idea to update it. Arrrr... Modules - F-18, F-16, Spitfire, F-5, Supercarrier, F-14, A10-C, MiG-21, Huey
Blinde Posted February 17, 2020 Posted February 17, 2020 It introduced more bugs than it fixed. The whole naval aviation is a big mess now.
draconus Posted February 17, 2020 Posted February 17, 2020 It introduced more bugs than it fixed. The whole naval aviation is a big mess now. You're a beta tester - it's optional. Report and move on. Win10 i7-10700KF 32GB RTX4070S Quest 3 T16000M VPC CDT-VMAX TFRP FC3 F-14A/B F-15E CA SC NTTR PG Syria
Blinde Posted February 17, 2020 Posted February 17, 2020 You're a beta tester - it's optional. Report and move on. That's really not an answer to all this. Yes, betas are usually prone to bugs but not like this which makes the naval operations pretty much unplayable. They should have tested this thoroughly and then release it. Looking at HB's record of fixing some of the bugs, this might take a while. No, I'm not blaming this on HB exclusively, ED should have waited until the whole package is ready.
rrohde Posted February 17, 2020 Posted February 17, 2020 That's really not an answer to all this. Yes, betas are usually prone to bugs but not like this which makes the naval operations pretty much unplayable. They should have tested this thoroughly and then release it. Looking at HB's record of fixing bugs, this might take a while. No, I'm not blaming this on HB exclusively, ED should have waited until the whole package is ready. As mentioned before, this is ED's way to include the player base who doesn't mind using the beta and being part of the process. If this is too much, the stable release might be the way to go. PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | MSI Suprim GeForce 3090 TI | ASUS Prime X570-P | 128GB DDR4 3600 RAM | 2TB Samsung 870 EVO SSD | Win10 Pro 64bit Gear: HP Reverb G2 | JetPad FSE | VKB Gunfighter Pro Mk.III w/ MCG Ultimate VKBcontrollers.com
Blinde Posted February 17, 2020 Posted February 17, 2020 As mentioned before, this is ED's way to include the player base who doesn't mind using the beta and being part of the process. If this is too much, the stable release might be the way to go. That is true and sad. Stable would be good choice if it wouldn't take so long to get support for new modules. If you want to fly new and fresh module, beta is the only way.
Harlikwin Posted February 17, 2020 Posted February 17, 2020 You're a beta tester - it's optional. Report and move on. Its a terminology issue. Beta's shouldn't have game breaking problems like this does, beta should be mostly stable and some bugs. Core functionality should work in a beta and the bugs while to be expected shouldn't be this bad. What ED pushed out is an Alpha release IMO. I mean a 30-50% drop in VR frames is pretty bad, killing MP servers is even worse. Many people have reverted rather than deal with "testing this". New hotness: I7 9700k 4.8ghz, 32gb ddr4, 2080ti, :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, HP Reverb (formermly CV1) Old-N-busted: i7 4720HQ ~3.5GHZ, +32GB DDR3 + Nvidia GTX980m (4GB VRAM) :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, Rift CV1 (yes really).
DD_Fenrir Posted February 17, 2020 Posted February 17, 2020 Nonsense. Generally, from OpenBeta debut to Stable Release inclusion for new aircraft, the push has been 4 - 6 weeks. It apparently needs reiterating; THE OPEN BETA IS A PUBLIC TEST BUILD. IT DOES NOT EXIST TO ALLOW YOU BRAGGING RIGHTS TO NEW TOYS. IT EXISTS TO ALLOW A WIDER VARIETY OF USERS TO DISCOVER MORE ISSUES THAN THE TEAM COULD HOPE TO COVER ON THEIR OWN. BY USING IT YOU ARE TACITLY AGREEING FOR THE POTENTIAL TO BE EXPOSED TO SOME FUNDAMENTAL/GAME BREAKING BUGS. IF YOU CHOOSE TO RUN OPENBETA EXCLUSIVELY AND DO NOT LIKE HAVING YOUR DCS INSTALL BROKEN THEN YOU SHOULD NOT BE USING OPEN BETA.
GunSlingerAUS Posted February 18, 2020 Posted February 18, 2020 Nonsense. Generally, from OpenBeta debut to Stable Release inclusion for new aircraft, the push has been 4 - 6 weeks. It apparently needs reiterating; THE OPEN BETA IS A PUBLIC TEST BUILD. IT DOES NOT EXIST TO ALLOW YOU BRAGGING RIGHTS TO NEW TOYS. IT EXISTS TO ALLOW A WIDER VARIETY OF USERS TO DISCOVER MORE ISSUES THAN THE TEAM COULD HOPE TO COVER ON THEIR OWN. BY USING IT YOU ARE TACITLY AGREEING FOR THE POTENTIAL TO BE EXPOSED TO SOME FUNDAMENTAL/GAME BREAKING BUGS. IF YOU CHOOSE TO RUN OPENBETA EXCLUSIVELY AND DO NOT LIKE HAVING YOUR DCS INSTALL BROKEN THEN YOU SHOULD NOT BE USING OPEN BETA. This is true, but we shouldn't see numerous bugs to the extent of 2.5.6. Compared to the dozens of other betas I'm in, the latest patch was unfortunately very disappointing. Intel 11900K/NVIDIA RTX 3090/32GB DDR4 3666/Z590 Asus Maximus motherboard/2TB Samsung EVO Pro/55" LG C9 120Hz @ 4K/Windows 10/Jotunheim Schiit external headphone amp/Virpil HOTAS + MFG Crosswind pedals
draconus Posted February 18, 2020 Posted February 18, 2020 This is true, but we shouldn't see numerous bugs to the extent of 2.5.6. Compared to the dozens of other betas I'm in, the latest patch was unfortunately very disappointing. These are your personal feelings, I get it, but there's no such thing as too much bugs in beta. What is still keeping you in beta branch then? "New and fresh modules"? They are EA, beta, unfinished and more buggy so even more disappointing. Win10 i7-10700KF 32GB RTX4070S Quest 3 T16000M VPC CDT-VMAX TFRP FC3 F-14A/B F-15E CA SC NTTR PG Syria
Recommended Posts