F-15E UFC poll

[FoxOne007]

yea JHMCs certainly wasn't around with suite 4. JHMCS is fairly late addition. circa 2010ish when it became operational for strike eagles?

 

https://www.af.mil/News/Features/Display/Article/142892/airmen-enhance-f-15e-capabilities-with-helmet-mounted-cueing-system/

 

 

Aim9X is only being issued since 2018 for mudhens. I think suite 8 or something. So even if razbam can pull a newer than suite 4 im not holding my breath for a too modern of a strike eagle.

It still decently modern ground weapons wise at least, JHMCS and AIM-9X are nice but not a must on a mainly ground focused aircraft imo, I guess most of us got a little spoiled by those with the Hornet and Viper :)

[bies]

yea JHMCs certainly wasn't around with suite 4. JHMCS is fairly late addition. circa 2010ish when it became operational for strike eagles?

 

But digital display from this poll is also circa 2010ish... What does it mean?

Edited June 5, 2020 by bies

[Kev2go]

Like Harlikwin said yeah basically those, not sure which TGP it carried back then, could still be LANTIRN. but if they decide to make a newer version than Suite 4 we will very likely see the Sniper ATP instead of the LANTIRN

 

IRRC i think it rainmaker said that in 2003 period Strike eagles got Litening 2 as a temporary interim solution until Sniper could be fielded, because the Lantirn was pretty obsolete by the 2000's.

 

So although Razbam did promised a Sniper, all im trying to say is that even if its limited to suite 4 it would imply that the still can fall back on the Litening, which is still a quantum leap over the Lantirn.

[Kev2go]

It still decently modern ground weapons wise at least, JHMCS and AIM-9X are nice but not a must on a mainly ground focused aircraft imo, I guess most of us got a little spoiled by those with the Hornet and Viper :)

 

Im interested how good A/G radar will be. especially compared to Hornet. WHen F15E's started going into operation APG70 at the time was cited as able to use SAR mode to zoom into up to 1.3x1.3 NM area and have 17 foot resolution from a distance of 30 miles and do a 8.5 foot grade resolution with same box at 20 nautical miles.

 

Eventually in the mid 90s that was further improved with a higher resolution modes allowing 4 foot resolution with 0.33NMx0.33NM patches.

Edited August 21, 2020 by Kev2go

[Jarlerus]

But digital display from this poll is also circa 2010ish... What does it mean?

It means Frankenplane. A fictive module. :((((

[Swordsman422]

I'm attracted to the analog UFC for Cold War, ODS, and mid 90's missions. I'll buy it either way, but that's my vote.

[bies]

It means Frankenplane. A fictive module. :((((

 

That is what I am afraid of.

I still hope Razbam will chose some realistic variant existing in real life, not some fictional plane.

[Harlikwin]

That is what I am afraid of.

I still hope Razbam will chose some realistic variant existing in real life, not some fictional plane.

 

I mean we have a franken harrier as near as I can tell. And the mirage has changed shape a few times so not sure there either.

[Hash]

Voted analog cuz 4 MFD's is way too many

[303_Vins]

Personnaly id does not matter.

[shu77]

Pfft if you buy the 3rd MFD for Hornet you will have a fourth spare...

[Kev2go]

Voted analog cuz 4 MFD's is way too many

 

FYI the "4th" MFD isn't really a MFD. IF it was, i would have been far more enthusiastic for getting one.

[Eldur]

Voted old'n'gold.

[TheCabal]

Do both... I hate the "digital horsecrap".

[bies]

IDK why there is the poll.

 

If Razbam is allowed to model post 2010 F-15E they should make post 2010 digital display.

 

If thay are allowed to make pre 2010 F-15E they should make pre 2010 analog display, because digital display didn't exist.

 

I'll be interested in any realistic variant anyway.

[Hawkeye_UK]

@decoy

 

He's an idea - Razbam start acknowledging support bugs and issues raised on their existing modules, oh and resolving them.

 

Let's start a new poll of what your customers actually want in terms of sorting out the modules you already have and actually reply to customers that have taken their time to provide testing for you and at least have the common courtesy to acknowledge them.

 

Absolute joke regarding bringing out additional modules, lets have a reality check considering you struggle to support let alone complete the existing two released (some issues reported and 2 years still outstanding).

Edited June 9, 2020 by Hawkeye_UK

[Focha]

Only analog! Like in the F-15 Strike Eagle III and Jane's!

 

+1

[Gierasimov]

Digital. Thank you for asking.

[Csgo GE oh yeah]

I don't care. Just hurry !

 

I NEEEED THIS MODULEEEE !~~!~~~!!!

[303_Vins]

Has the same functionality. No matter.

[Pilot_paul_r]

Digital for me

[Tiger-II]

Both, and make it an option in settings to pick.

[Moorhuhn]

Please the analog one ...

 

 

What is the actual status? More votes for analog or more votes for digital?

[Bedouin]

Please the analog one ...

 

 

What is the actual status? More votes for analog or more votes for digital?

 

Check top of the page there is a sum of the poll ;)

[Moorhuhn]

Check top of the page there is a sum of the poll ;)

Sorry,

seems I had tomatoes on my eyes :)

Doesn't look good for the analog one :(

And what happens now to the analog one? On the screenshot, it looks likes it was already finished. Is it going to the trash can now?

Did the Suite 4+ Versions even had the digital one? Or is it now going to be an fictional Aircraft? an UFO? :( Can't imagine why anybody would vote for an fictional aircraft for DCS. :doh: (Please correct me if there were Suite 4+ with the digital one, maybe I am wrong with this)

 

Digital, Ficional, no Backseat-AI ... I will buy it anyway, but it seems not to be one of the best modules in my collection. Even it's the legendary Strike Eagle. Let's see what we get at the end.

 

 

Stay healthy and fly safe