T-O-A Posted January 3, 2021 Posted January 3, 2021 I found a folder with the name "mig-29k" ---> C:\Program Files\Eagle Dynamics\DCS World OpenBeta\Bazar\Liveries I wanted to ask if we have a K Version in the game? As flyable part of fc3 or just as an AI. Unfortunatly I cant find a flyable version or an AI in the game. The K Version is the navy Version and would fit very good on Admiral Kusnezow Thanks for help
SovietAce Posted January 3, 2021 Posted January 3, 2021 We had. Once. But sadly not anymore. This folder is inheritance from Flanker 2.5 times. 2 1
T-O-A Posted January 3, 2021 Author Posted January 3, 2021 Thanks for feedback. Was it just an AI or flyable module/part of the game? Maybe FC2? When was this one cut out of the game? Looking at your picture the graphics looks really really awful. But we have at the moment also an A Tomcat, an A Hornet, a Sea Hawk and some other Assets and AIs with this graphic. So why was this one removed? I hope it come back some day in 2021 graphic. I hope all the outdated assets and AI with old graphic will be removed and return with up-to-date graphic.
VirusAM Posted January 3, 2021 Posted January 3, 2021 Thanks for feedback. Was it just an AI or flyable module/part of the game? Maybe FC2? When was this one cut out of the game? Looking at your picture the graphics looks really really awful. But we have at the moment also an A Tomcat, an A Hornet, a Sea Hawk and some other Assets and AIs with this graphic. So why was this one removed? I hope it come back some day in 2021 graphic. I hope all the outdated assets and AI with old graphic will be removed and return with up-to-date graphic.It was flyable and landable on a carrier in flanker 2.5...It was awesome. 1 R7-5800X3D 64GB RTX-4090 LG-38GN950 N/A Realsimulator FFSB MKII Ultra, VKB Stecs Max, Winwing F-16EX Throttle, Winwing Orion (Skywalker) Pedals, Razer Tartarus V2 SpeedMaster Flight Seat, JetSeat
Rudel_chw Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 You could give this Mod a try: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3311481/ 1 For work: iMac mid-2010 of 27" - Core i7 870 - 6 GB DDR3 1333 MHz - ATI HD5670 - SSD 256 GB - HDD 2 TB - macOS High Sierra For Gaming: 34" Monitor - Ryzen 3600 - 32 GB DDR4 2400 - nVidia RTX2080 - SSD 1.25 TB - HDD 10 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Cougar Mobile: iPad Pro 12.9" of 256 GB
unknown Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 (edited) 11 hours ago, T-O-A said: Was it just an AI or flyable module/part of the game? Maybe FC2? When was this one cut out of the game? Not FC2, but Flanker 2 series, so talking around year 2000! Flanker series -> LockOn(me discovering the series) -> DCS Edited January 4, 2021 by unknown Modules: KA-50, A-10C, FC3, UH-1H, MI-8MTV2, CA, MIG-21bis, FW-190D9, Bf-109K4, F-86F, MIG-15bis, M-2000C, SA342 Gazelle, AJS-37 Viggen, F/A-18C, F-14, C-101, FW-190A8, F-16C, F-5E, JF-17, SC, Mi-24P Hind, AH-64D Apache, Mirage F1, F-4E Phantom II System: Win 11 Pro 64bit, Ryzen 3800X, 32gb RAM DDR4-3200, PowerColor Radeon RX 6900XT Red Devil ,1 x Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB NVMe, 2 x Samsung SSD 2TB + 1TB SATA, MFG Crosswind Rudder Pedals - VIRPIL T-50CM and VIRPIL MongoosT-50 Throttle - HP Reverg G2, using only the latest Open Beta, DCS settings
Stratos Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 11 hours ago, Rudel_chw said: You could give this Mod a try: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3311481/ How in the world you land without a hook? I don't understand anything in russian except Davai Davai!
Rudel_chw Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 The hook is invisible, deploy with left alt G For work: iMac mid-2010 of 27" - Core i7 870 - 6 GB DDR3 1333 MHz - ATI HD5670 - SSD 256 GB - HDD 2 TB - macOS High Sierra For Gaming: 34" Monitor - Ryzen 3600 - 32 GB DDR4 2400 - nVidia RTX2080 - SSD 1.25 TB - HDD 10 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Cougar Mobile: iPad Pro 12.9" of 256 GB
Stratos Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 17 minutes ago, Rudel_chw said: The hook is invisible, deploy with left alt G Good, I tried to search in the controls without luck I don't understand anything in russian except Davai Davai!
Sol 1 Mihaly Posted January 12, 2021 Posted January 12, 2021 ED will release the F-35 before they bother updating or adding russian content. 4
Rudel_chw Posted January 12, 2021 Posted January 12, 2021 7 hours ago, Sol 1 Mihaly said: ED will release the F-35 before they bother updating or adding russian content. you are new here, yet you feel well enough to post this type of empty post? You really believe that the reason why ED cant publish a modern russian fighter is because they wont bother? What are you, 12? 6 For work: iMac mid-2010 of 27" - Core i7 870 - 6 GB DDR3 1333 MHz - ATI HD5670 - SSD 256 GB - HDD 2 TB - macOS High Sierra For Gaming: 34" Monitor - Ryzen 3600 - 32 GB DDR4 2400 - nVidia RTX2080 - SSD 1.25 TB - HDD 10 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Cougar Mobile: iPad Pro 12.9" of 256 GB
Bunny Clark Posted January 27, 2021 Posted January 27, 2021 On 1/11/2021 at 8:21 PM, Sol 1 Mihaly said: ED will release the F-35 before they bother updating or adding russian content. I'd love an F-35 before the announced DCS: MiG-29A 9.12 is released! Somehow, I don't think that's very likely... Oil In The Water Hornet Campaign. Bunny's: Form-Fillable Controller Layout PDFs | HOTAS Kneeboards | Checklist Kneeboards
Hodo Posted February 17, 2021 Posted February 17, 2021 I am all for a 29k granted I can barely land the current 29. But the stronger landing gear would be nice.
Seaeagle Posted February 17, 2021 Posted February 17, 2021 1 hour ago, Hodo said: I am all for a 29k granted I can barely land the current 29. But the stronger landing gear would be nice. The real MiG-29K has fly-by-wire control system, bigger wings, more engine power etc, so a completely different "beast".
Hodo Posted February 18, 2021 Posted February 18, 2021 20 hours ago, Seaeagle said: The real MiG-29K has fly-by-wire control system, bigger wings, more engine power etc, so a completely different "beast". I understand. I was just saying my biggest wish... 1
Seaeagle Posted February 18, 2021 Posted February 18, 2021 15 minutes ago, Hodo said: I understand. I was just saying my biggest wish... Yeah mine too. I just meant that your struggle with landing the current 29, could be less with the 29K :) . 1
Top Jockey Posted February 20, 2021 Posted February 20, 2021 (edited) ... and I'm all for trying the MIG-29K's turning capabilities, as the the A variant was a bit of a let down for what I expected IRL. Edited February 20, 2021 by Top Jockey Hangar FC3 | F-14A/B | F-16C | F/A-18C | MiG-21bis | Mirage 2000C ... ... JA 37 | Kfir | MiG-23 | Mirage IIIE Mi-8 MTV2 system i7-4790 K , 16 GB DDR3 , GTX 1660 Ti 6GB , Samsung 860 QVO 1TB
F-2 Posted February 27, 2021 Posted February 27, 2021 So here is a question, how accurate is Flanker 2.5s flight model? Could this be used for a resurrected Accurate mig-29k?
SharkWizard Posted February 28, 2021 Posted February 28, 2021 1 hour ago, F-2 said: So here is a question, how accurate is Flanker 2.5s flight model? Could this be used for a resurrected Accurate mig-29k? I believe it was a simple flight model, predecessor of the Flaming Cliffs simple flight models which we had on the FC3 planes until they were improved with the current much much more advanced and complicated (to make/understand/program) flight model. I suspect if the current 29 flight model was modified with a dash of more lift and drag and a (8G max before things started to break) it would be far more accurate than the 2.5 model. Additionally the 2.5 MiG-29K (which was supposed to be the original 1980s version of course) had the cockpit of the 9.12 or 9.13 instead of the actual original MiG-29K cockpit of which there is a beautiful 3d rendition posted on these very forums. 1
F-2 Posted February 28, 2021 Posted February 28, 2021 13 minutes ago, SharkWizard said: I believe it was a simple flight model, predecessor of the Flaming Cliffs simple flight models which we had on the FC3 planes until they were improved with the current much much more advanced and complicated (to make/understand/program) flight model. I suspect if the current 29 flight model was modified with a dash of more lift and drag and a (8G max before things started to break) it would be far more accurate than the 2.5 model. Additionally the 2.5 MiG-29K (which was supposed to be the original 1980s version of course) had the cockpit of the 9.12 or 9.13 instead of the actual original MiG-29K cockpit of which there is a beautiful 3d rendition posted on these very forums. Ah well it was a nice thought. But excellent response. I think I’ve seen said artists work before.
Top Jockey Posted February 28, 2021 Posted February 28, 2021 22 hours ago, F-2 said: So here is a question, how accurate is Flanker 2.5s flight model? Could this be used for a resurrected Accurate mig-29k? If I recal correctly, remember reading at some forum that it wasn't exactly much maneuverable or easy to fly in Flanker 2.5... that's all. 1 Hangar FC3 | F-14A/B | F-16C | F/A-18C | MiG-21bis | Mirage 2000C ... ... JA 37 | Kfir | MiG-23 | Mirage IIIE Mi-8 MTV2 system i7-4790 K , 16 GB DDR3 , GTX 1660 Ti 6GB , Samsung 860 QVO 1TB
Top Jockey Posted March 21, 2021 Posted March 21, 2021 On 2/28/2021 at 9:45 PM, Top Jockey said: If I recal correctly, remember reading at some forum that it wasn't exactly much maneuverable or easy to fly in Flanker 2.5... that's all. ... this is probably what I've read long ago: " The plane ( MIG-29K ) is more difficult to fly than either version of the Flanker. You must be much gentler with the controls to avoid rapidly running out of airspeed, altitude, and options. Once, however, you get the hang of it, you'll find the MiG to be more nimble than its larger Flanker brethren. " https://web.archive.org/web/20050112171138/http://archive.gamespy.com/reviews/april02/flanker/index2.shtm Hangar FC3 | F-14A/B | F-16C | F/A-18C | MiG-21bis | Mirage 2000C ... ... JA 37 | Kfir | MiG-23 | Mirage IIIE Mi-8 MTV2 system i7-4790 K , 16 GB DDR3 , GTX 1660 Ti 6GB , Samsung 860 QVO 1TB
Seaeagle Posted March 23, 2021 Posted March 23, 2021 On 3/22/2021 at 12:14 AM, Top Jockey said: ... this is probably what I've read long ago: " The plane ( MIG-29K ) is more difficult to fly than either version of the Flanker. You must be much gentler with the controls to avoid rapidly running out of airspeed, altitude, and options... Which was pretty much the opposite of what it should be :) . 1
Top Jockey Posted March 23, 2021 Posted March 23, 2021 20 minutes ago, Seaeagle said: Which was pretty much the opposite of what it should be . You're probably right. I didin't yet research much on the MiG-29K, so I don't even know what kind of flight controls, and design stabibility, the 'K' variant has. Eitherway it doesn't surprise me much, it's a 20 year old flight model afterall... Hangar FC3 | F-14A/B | F-16C | F/A-18C | MiG-21bis | Mirage 2000C ... ... JA 37 | Kfir | MiG-23 | Mirage IIIE Mi-8 MTV2 system i7-4790 K , 16 GB DDR3 , GTX 1660 Ti 6GB , Samsung 860 QVO 1TB
Seaeagle Posted March 24, 2021 Posted March 24, 2021 6 hours ago, Top Jockey said: You're probably right. I didin't yet research much on the MiG-29K, so I don't even know what kind of flight controls, and design stabibility, the 'K' variant has. Eitherway it doesn't surprise me much, it's a 20 year old flight model afterall... Even the first MiG-29K version had a digital fly-by-wire flight control system and the center of gravity was moved further back for "relaxed stability". 1
Recommended Posts